露天树冠溪流中附生和附生生物膜在维持呼吸活动方面对 DOM 来源的不同利用

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
María Laura Messetta, Claudia Feijoó, Ana Torremorell, Eugenia Martí, Miquel Ribot
{"title":"露天树冠溪流中附生和附生生物膜在维持呼吸活动方面对 DOM 来源的不同利用","authors":"María Laura Messetta, Claudia Feijoó, Ana Torremorell, Eugenia Martí, Miquel Ribot","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05657-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dissolved organic matter in open-canopy streams is mostly derived from autochthonous sources, but the role of autochthonous DOM to sustain heterotrophic communities has been poorly studied. We compared respiration rates of epiphytic and epipelic biofilms (measured by the Resazurin—Resorufin tracer system) when processing autochthonous and allocthonous DOM sources with different chemical and optical properties. We performed laboratory experiments to determine aerobic respiration rates of epipelic and epiphytic communities in different leachates from autochthonous (macroalgae and emergent and submerged macrophytes) and allochthonous (riparian grasses) DOM sources from a Pampean stream. We also determined dissolved organic carbon and nutrient contents and DOM optical properties of each leachate. We found that epipelon was more heterotrophic and showed a lower respiratory activity than epiphyton, regardless of the type of leachate. Epiphytic respiratory activity was positively associated with DOM of microbial origin with a lower degree of humification (i.e., autochthonous microbial-algal derived materials), while epipelic respiratory activity was related to autochthonous and allochthonous humic-like materials, with higher aromaticity, derived from grasses and macrophytes. This indicates that both autochthonous and allochthonous sources can sustain microbial respiratory activity in the stream, and highlights the role of primary producers in the carbon cycle of open-canopy streams.</p>","PeriodicalId":13147,"journal":{"name":"Hydrobiologia","volume":"165 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential use of DOM sources to sustain respiratory activity in epiphytic and epipelic biofilms in an open-canopy stream\",\"authors\":\"María Laura Messetta, Claudia Feijoó, Ana Torremorell, Eugenia Martí, Miquel Ribot\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10750-024-05657-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dissolved organic matter in open-canopy streams is mostly derived from autochthonous sources, but the role of autochthonous DOM to sustain heterotrophic communities has been poorly studied. We compared respiration rates of epiphytic and epipelic biofilms (measured by the Resazurin—Resorufin tracer system) when processing autochthonous and allocthonous DOM sources with different chemical and optical properties. We performed laboratory experiments to determine aerobic respiration rates of epipelic and epiphytic communities in different leachates from autochthonous (macroalgae and emergent and submerged macrophytes) and allochthonous (riparian grasses) DOM sources from a Pampean stream. We also determined dissolved organic carbon and nutrient contents and DOM optical properties of each leachate. We found that epipelon was more heterotrophic and showed a lower respiratory activity than epiphyton, regardless of the type of leachate. Epiphytic respiratory activity was positively associated with DOM of microbial origin with a lower degree of humification (i.e., autochthonous microbial-algal derived materials), while epipelic respiratory activity was related to autochthonous and allochthonous humic-like materials, with higher aromaticity, derived from grasses and macrophytes. This indicates that both autochthonous and allochthonous sources can sustain microbial respiratory activity in the stream, and highlights the role of primary producers in the carbon cycle of open-canopy streams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrobiologia\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05657-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05657-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开阔树冠区溪流中的溶解有机物大多来自自生源,但对自生溶解有机物在维持异养生物群落方面的作用研究甚少。我们比较了附生生物膜和附生生物膜在处理具有不同化学和光学性质的自生和异生 DOM 源时的呼吸速率(通过 Resazurin-Resorufin 示踪系统测量)。我们进行了实验室实验,以测定潘潘河自生(大型藻类、挺水和沉水大型植物)和异生(河岸草)DOM 来源的不同浸出液中附生和附生群落的有氧呼吸速率。我们还测定了每种沥滤液的溶解有机碳和养分含量以及 DOM 光学特性。我们发现,与附生植物相比,无论沥滤液的类型如何,附生植物的异养程度更高,呼吸活性更低。附生生物的呼吸活性与腐殖化程度较低的微生物源 DOM(即自生微生物-藻类衍生物质)呈正相关,而附生生物的呼吸活性则与芳香度较高的自生和异生腐殖样物质有关,这些物质来自禾本科植物和大型草本植物。这表明溪流中的自生源和异生源都能维持微生物的呼吸活动,并突出了初级生产者在开阔树冠溪流碳循环中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differential use of DOM sources to sustain respiratory activity in epiphytic and epipelic biofilms in an open-canopy stream

Differential use of DOM sources to sustain respiratory activity in epiphytic and epipelic biofilms in an open-canopy stream

Dissolved organic matter in open-canopy streams is mostly derived from autochthonous sources, but the role of autochthonous DOM to sustain heterotrophic communities has been poorly studied. We compared respiration rates of epiphytic and epipelic biofilms (measured by the Resazurin—Resorufin tracer system) when processing autochthonous and allocthonous DOM sources with different chemical and optical properties. We performed laboratory experiments to determine aerobic respiration rates of epipelic and epiphytic communities in different leachates from autochthonous (macroalgae and emergent and submerged macrophytes) and allochthonous (riparian grasses) DOM sources from a Pampean stream. We also determined dissolved organic carbon and nutrient contents and DOM optical properties of each leachate. We found that epipelon was more heterotrophic and showed a lower respiratory activity than epiphyton, regardless of the type of leachate. Epiphytic respiratory activity was positively associated with DOM of microbial origin with a lower degree of humification (i.e., autochthonous microbial-algal derived materials), while epipelic respiratory activity was related to autochthonous and allochthonous humic-like materials, with higher aromaticity, derived from grasses and macrophytes. This indicates that both autochthonous and allochthonous sources can sustain microbial respiratory activity in the stream, and highlights the role of primary producers in the carbon cycle of open-canopy streams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrobiologia
Hydrobiologia 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Hydrobiologia publishes original research, reviews and opinions regarding the biology of all aquatic environments, including the impact of human activities. We welcome molecular-, organism-, community- and ecosystem-level studies in contributions dealing with limnology and oceanography, including systematics and aquatic ecology. Hypothesis-driven experimental research is preferred, but also theoretical papers or articles with large descriptive content will be considered, provided they are made relevant to a broad hydrobiological audience. Applied aspects will be considered if firmly embedded in an ecological context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信