评估中国不同土壤类型中低温取水产生的土壤水同位素偏差

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Pei Zhao, Weige Yang, Xiangyang Sun
{"title":"评估中国不同土壤类型中低温取水产生的土壤水同位素偏差","authors":"Pei Zhao,&nbsp;Weige Yang,&nbsp;Xiangyang Sun","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The utilization of deuterium (δ<sup>2</sup>H) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) isotope ratios in cryogenically extracted water from soil samples is a widely employed method in hydrological and ecological research. Nevertheless, an increasing body of research indicates that cryogenic water extraction (CWE) leads to δ<sup>2</sup>H depletion in soil water. To investigate the widespread existence of this phenomenon, samples from eight physicochemically distinct soils in China underwent rehydration with a reference water at five different water contents and were subsequently extracted using CWE. In comparison to the reference water, significant and inconsistent δ<sup>2</sup>H depletion was observed in all eight soil samples. The δ<sup>18</sup>O bias also exhibited variation, ranging from enrichment to depletion. Generally, Z score assessments indicated unacceptable results for all soils. Water content emerged as the most influential variable affecting both δ<sup>2</sup>H and δ<sup>18</sup>O biases, while soil properties had different impacts on these biases. Source water, as calculated by a linear regression model, revealed that the isotopic composition of extracted soil water differed from that of the reference water. The cryogenic extraction error in soil water could not solely attributed to fractionation processes during the extraction but resulted from the release of tightly bound soil water into the reference water. Using the influencing factors, correction models for δ<sup>2</sup>H and δ<sup>18</sup>O biases by CWE were developed. By these models, the δ<sup>2</sup>H and δ<sup>18</sup>O biases were mostly successful corrected. High soil water extraction efficiency (e.g., 99%) was recommended to minimize isotopic biases. These efforts necessitate further testing, particularly in ecohydrological studies involving isotope measurements of soil water through CWE.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"38 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the isotopic biases of soil water from cryogenic water extraction in different soil types in China\",\"authors\":\"Pei Zhao,&nbsp;Weige Yang,&nbsp;Xiangyang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.15228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The utilization of deuterium (δ<sup>2</sup>H) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) isotope ratios in cryogenically extracted water from soil samples is a widely employed method in hydrological and ecological research. Nevertheless, an increasing body of research indicates that cryogenic water extraction (CWE) leads to δ<sup>2</sup>H depletion in soil water. To investigate the widespread existence of this phenomenon, samples from eight physicochemically distinct soils in China underwent rehydration with a reference water at five different water contents and were subsequently extracted using CWE. In comparison to the reference water, significant and inconsistent δ<sup>2</sup>H depletion was observed in all eight soil samples. The δ<sup>18</sup>O bias also exhibited variation, ranging from enrichment to depletion. Generally, Z score assessments indicated unacceptable results for all soils. Water content emerged as the most influential variable affecting both δ<sup>2</sup>H and δ<sup>18</sup>O biases, while soil properties had different impacts on these biases. Source water, as calculated by a linear regression model, revealed that the isotopic composition of extracted soil water differed from that of the reference water. The cryogenic extraction error in soil water could not solely attributed to fractionation processes during the extraction but resulted from the release of tightly bound soil water into the reference water. Using the influencing factors, correction models for δ<sup>2</sup>H and δ<sup>18</sup>O biases by CWE were developed. By these models, the δ<sup>2</sup>H and δ<sup>18</sup>O biases were mostly successful corrected. High soil water extraction efficiency (e.g., 99%) was recommended to minimize isotopic biases. These efforts necessitate further testing, particularly in ecohydrological studies involving isotope measurements of soil water through CWE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"38 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15228\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用从土壤样本中低温提取的水中的氘(δ2H)和氧(δ18O)同位素比值是水文和生态研究中广泛采用的一种方法。然而,越来越多的研究表明,低温取水(CWE)会导致土壤水中的δ2H损耗。为了研究这种现象是否普遍存在,我们从中国八种不同理化性质的土壤中采集了样品,用五种不同含水量的参比水进行复水,然后用低温水提取法进行提取。与参比水相比,所有八种土壤样品都出现了明显且不一致的δ2H损耗。δ18O偏差也表现出差异,从富集到损耗不等。一般来说,Z 值评估表明所有土壤的结果都是不可接受的。含水量是影响 δ2H 和 δ18O 偏差的最大变量,而土壤特性对这些偏差的影响各不相同。通过线性回归模型计算得出的源水表明,提取的土壤水的同位素组成与参比水的同位素组成不同。土壤水的低温萃取误差不能完全归因于萃取过程中的分馏过程,而是由于紧密结合的土壤水释放到了参比水中。利用这些影响因素,建立了 CWE 对 δ2H 和 δ18O 偏差的校正模型。通过这些模型,δ2H 和 δ18O偏差大多得到了成功校正。建议采用较高的土壤水提取效率(如 99%),以尽量减少同位素偏差。这些工作需要进一步测试,特别是在涉及通过 CWE 对土壤水进行同位素测量的生态水文研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the isotopic biases of soil water from cryogenic water extraction in different soil types in China

The utilization of deuterium (δ2H) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope ratios in cryogenically extracted water from soil samples is a widely employed method in hydrological and ecological research. Nevertheless, an increasing body of research indicates that cryogenic water extraction (CWE) leads to δ2H depletion in soil water. To investigate the widespread existence of this phenomenon, samples from eight physicochemically distinct soils in China underwent rehydration with a reference water at five different water contents and were subsequently extracted using CWE. In comparison to the reference water, significant and inconsistent δ2H depletion was observed in all eight soil samples. The δ18O bias also exhibited variation, ranging from enrichment to depletion. Generally, Z score assessments indicated unacceptable results for all soils. Water content emerged as the most influential variable affecting both δ2H and δ18O biases, while soil properties had different impacts on these biases. Source water, as calculated by a linear regression model, revealed that the isotopic composition of extracted soil water differed from that of the reference water. The cryogenic extraction error in soil water could not solely attributed to fractionation processes during the extraction but resulted from the release of tightly bound soil water into the reference water. Using the influencing factors, correction models for δ2H and δ18O biases by CWE were developed. By these models, the δ2H and δ18O biases were mostly successful corrected. High soil water extraction efficiency (e.g., 99%) was recommended to minimize isotopic biases. These efforts necessitate further testing, particularly in ecohydrological studies involving isotope measurements of soil water through CWE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信