{"title":"探索不丹生物教师对科学模型的认识","authors":"Karma Dorji, Tashi Choden, Pem Choden, Pema Tshering","doi":"10.1007/s10763-024-10485-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While Bhutanese biology teachers are expected to possess a rich understanding of scientific models, little is known about their perceptions of scientific models. This study, thus, examined Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models. The study recruited one hundred and eleven (N = 111) biology teachers using a total population sampling strategy. Quantitative data were collected using an online survey questionnaire, whereas, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using statistical methods and content analysis respectively. Findings indicated that Bhutanese biology teachers' views surrounding multiplicity and tentativeness of scientific models were almost entirely correct. However, they held a range of incorrect views in that they openly considered photographs as scientific models, scientific models as exact copies of realities, and physical objects as only real scientific models. Furthermore, their views regarding the potential application of scientific models appeared increasingly limited with models being a mere communication devices. The independent sample <i>t</i>-test revealed a lack of significant difference in Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models based on gender (<i>p</i> > .05). Similarly, the three-factor ANOVA revealed no significant effects of an individual or the combination of academic qualifications, school type, and teaching experiences on Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models (<i>p</i> > .05). Further, the multiple linear regression model indicated no significant influence of gender, academic qualifications, school type, and teaching experiences on Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models (<i>p</i> > .05). Research implications related to the Ministry of Education, science curriculum developers, and teacher training modules are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14267,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Bhutanese Biology Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Models\",\"authors\":\"Karma Dorji, Tashi Choden, Pem Choden, Pema Tshering\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10763-024-10485-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While Bhutanese biology teachers are expected to possess a rich understanding of scientific models, little is known about their perceptions of scientific models. This study, thus, examined Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models. The study recruited one hundred and eleven (N = 111) biology teachers using a total population sampling strategy. Quantitative data were collected using an online survey questionnaire, whereas, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using statistical methods and content analysis respectively. Findings indicated that Bhutanese biology teachers' views surrounding multiplicity and tentativeness of scientific models were almost entirely correct. However, they held a range of incorrect views in that they openly considered photographs as scientific models, scientific models as exact copies of realities, and physical objects as only real scientific models. Furthermore, their views regarding the potential application of scientific models appeared increasingly limited with models being a mere communication devices. The independent sample <i>t</i>-test revealed a lack of significant difference in Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models based on gender (<i>p</i> > .05). Similarly, the three-factor ANOVA revealed no significant effects of an individual or the combination of academic qualifications, school type, and teaching experiences on Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models (<i>p</i> > .05). Further, the multiple linear regression model indicated no significant influence of gender, academic qualifications, school type, and teaching experiences on Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models (<i>p</i> > .05). Research implications related to the Ministry of Education, science curriculum developers, and teacher training modules are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10485-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10485-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然不丹的生物教师应该对科学模型有丰富的了解,但对他们对科学模型的看法却知之甚少。因此,本研究考察了不丹生物教师对科学模型的看法。研究采用总体人口抽样策略,招募了 111 名(N=111)生物教师。定量数据通过在线调查问卷收集,定性数据则通过半结构式访谈收集。定量和定性数据分别采用统计方法和内容分析法进行分析。研究结果表明,不丹生物教师对科学模型的多重性和暂定性的看法几乎完全正确。但是,他们也持有一系列不正确的观点,如他们公开认为照片是科学模型,科学模型是现实的精确复制品,实物才是真正的科学模型。此外,他们对科学模型潜在应用的看法似乎越来越局限,认为模型只是一种交流工具。独立样本 t 检验表明,不丹生物教师对科学模型的认识因性别不同而没有显著差异 (p> .05)。同样,三因素方差分析显示,个体或学历、学校类型和教学经验组合对不丹生物教师对科学模型的认知没有显著影响(p >.05)。此外,多元线性回归模型表明,性别、学历、学校类型和教学经验对不丹生物教师对科学模型的认知没有显著影响(p > .05)。本文讨论了与教育部、科学课程开发人员和教师培训模块相关的研究意义。
Exploring Bhutanese Biology Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Models
While Bhutanese biology teachers are expected to possess a rich understanding of scientific models, little is known about their perceptions of scientific models. This study, thus, examined Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models. The study recruited one hundred and eleven (N = 111) biology teachers using a total population sampling strategy. Quantitative data were collected using an online survey questionnaire, whereas, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using statistical methods and content analysis respectively. Findings indicated that Bhutanese biology teachers' views surrounding multiplicity and tentativeness of scientific models were almost entirely correct. However, they held a range of incorrect views in that they openly considered photographs as scientific models, scientific models as exact copies of realities, and physical objects as only real scientific models. Furthermore, their views regarding the potential application of scientific models appeared increasingly limited with models being a mere communication devices. The independent sample t-test revealed a lack of significant difference in Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models based on gender (p > .05). Similarly, the three-factor ANOVA revealed no significant effects of an individual or the combination of academic qualifications, school type, and teaching experiences on Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models (p > .05). Further, the multiple linear regression model indicated no significant influence of gender, academic qualifications, school type, and teaching experiences on Bhutanese biology teachers’ perceptions of scientific models (p > .05). Research implications related to the Ministry of Education, science curriculum developers, and teacher training modules are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The objective of this journal is to publish original, fully peer-reviewed articles on a variety of topics and research methods in both science and mathematics education. The journal welcomes articles that address common issues in mathematics and science education and cross-curricular dimensions more widely. Specific attention will be paid to manuscripts written by authors whose native language is not English and the editors have made arrangements for support in re-writing where appropriate. Contemporary educators highlight the importance of viewing knowledge as context-oriented and not limited to one domain. This concurs with current curriculum reforms worldwide for interdisciplinary and integrated curricula. Modern educational practice also focuses on the use of new technology in assisting instruction which may be easily implemented into such an integrated curriculum. The journal welcomes studies that explore science and mathematics education from different cultural perspectives.