数据驱动战略中认识论不确定性和意识的表征

IF 3.1 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mario Angelelli, Massimiliano Gervasi, Enrico Ciavolino
{"title":"数据驱动战略中认识论不确定性和意识的表征","authors":"Mario Angelelli, Massimiliano Gervasi, Enrico Ciavolino","doi":"10.1007/s00500-024-09661-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The diffusion of AI and big data is reshaping decision-making processes by increasing the amount of information that supports decisions, while reducing direct interaction with data and empirical evidence. This paradigm shift introduces new sources of uncertainty, as limited data observability results in ambiguity and a lack of interpretability. The need for the proper analysis of data-driven strategies motivates the search for new models that can describe this type of bounded access to knowledge.This contribution presents a novel theoretical model for uncertainty in knowledge representation and its transfer mediated by agents. We provide a dynamical description of knowledge states by endowing our model with a structure to compare and combine them. Specifically, an update is represented through combinations, and its explainability is based on its consistency in different dimensional representations. We look at inequivalent knowledge representations in terms of multiplicity of inferences, preference relations, and information measures. Furthermore, we define a formal analogy with two scenarios that illustrate non-classical uncertainty in terms of ambiguity (Ellsberg’s model) and reasoning about knowledge mediated by other agents observing data (Wigner’s Friend). Finally, we discuss some implications of the proposed model for data-driven strategies, with special attention to reasoning under uncertainty about business value dimensions and the design of measurement tools for their assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22039,"journal":{"name":"Soft Computing","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representations of epistemic uncertainty and awareness in data-driven strategies\",\"authors\":\"Mario Angelelli, Massimiliano Gervasi, Enrico Ciavolino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00500-024-09661-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The diffusion of AI and big data is reshaping decision-making processes by increasing the amount of information that supports decisions, while reducing direct interaction with data and empirical evidence. This paradigm shift introduces new sources of uncertainty, as limited data observability results in ambiguity and a lack of interpretability. The need for the proper analysis of data-driven strategies motivates the search for new models that can describe this type of bounded access to knowledge.This contribution presents a novel theoretical model for uncertainty in knowledge representation and its transfer mediated by agents. We provide a dynamical description of knowledge states by endowing our model with a structure to compare and combine them. Specifically, an update is represented through combinations, and its explainability is based on its consistency in different dimensional representations. We look at inequivalent knowledge representations in terms of multiplicity of inferences, preference relations, and information measures. Furthermore, we define a formal analogy with two scenarios that illustrate non-classical uncertainty in terms of ambiguity (Ellsberg’s model) and reasoning about knowledge mediated by other agents observing data (Wigner’s Friend). Finally, we discuss some implications of the proposed model for data-driven strategies, with special attention to reasoning under uncertainty about business value dimensions and the design of measurement tools for their assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soft Computing\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soft Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-09661-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-09661-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能和大数据的普及正在重塑决策过程,增加了支持决策的信息量,同时减少了与数据和经验证据的直接互动。这种模式转变带来了新的不确定性来源,因为有限的数据可观察性导致模糊性和缺乏可解释性。对数据驱动战略进行适当分析的需求促使人们寻找新的模型来描述这种有限制的知识获取方式。本文提出了一种新的理论模型,用于描述知识表征中的不确定性以及由代理促成的知识转移。通过赋予模型一种比较和组合知识状态的结构,我们对知识状态进行了动态描述。具体来说,更新是通过组合来表示的,其可解释性基于其在不同维度表示中的一致性。我们从推论的多重性、偏好关系和信息度量等方面来研究不等同的知识表征。此外,我们还定义了一种形式上的类比,即从模糊性(埃尔斯伯格模型)和以其他代理观察数据为中介的知识推理(维格纳之友)两个方面来说明非经典的不确定性。最后,我们讨论了所提出的模型对数据驱动战略的一些影响,特别关注商业价值维度不确定性下的推理以及评估这些维度的测量工具的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Representations of epistemic uncertainty and awareness in data-driven strategies

Representations of epistemic uncertainty and awareness in data-driven strategies

The diffusion of AI and big data is reshaping decision-making processes by increasing the amount of information that supports decisions, while reducing direct interaction with data and empirical evidence. This paradigm shift introduces new sources of uncertainty, as limited data observability results in ambiguity and a lack of interpretability. The need for the proper analysis of data-driven strategies motivates the search for new models that can describe this type of bounded access to knowledge.This contribution presents a novel theoretical model for uncertainty in knowledge representation and its transfer mediated by agents. We provide a dynamical description of knowledge states by endowing our model with a structure to compare and combine them. Specifically, an update is represented through combinations, and its explainability is based on its consistency in different dimensional representations. We look at inequivalent knowledge representations in terms of multiplicity of inferences, preference relations, and information measures. Furthermore, we define a formal analogy with two scenarios that illustrate non-classical uncertainty in terms of ambiguity (Ellsberg’s model) and reasoning about knowledge mediated by other agents observing data (Wigner’s Friend). Finally, we discuss some implications of the proposed model for data-driven strategies, with special attention to reasoning under uncertainty about business value dimensions and the design of measurement tools for their assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soft Computing
Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.80%
发文量
927
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Soft Computing is dedicated to system solutions based on soft computing techniques. It provides rapid dissemination of important results in soft computing technologies, a fusion of research in evolutionary algorithms and genetic programming, neural science and neural net systems, fuzzy set theory and fuzzy systems, and chaos theory and chaotic systems. Soft Computing encourages the integration of soft computing techniques and tools into both everyday and advanced applications. By linking the ideas and techniques of soft computing with other disciplines, the journal serves as a unifying platform that fosters comparisons, extensions, and new applications. As a result, the journal is an international forum for all scientists and engineers engaged in research and development in this fast growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信