Rohan Biswas, S. Nath, J. Gehlot, Gonika, Chandra Kumar, A. Parihari, N. Madhavan, A. Vinayak, Amritraj Mahato, Shoaib Noor, Phurba Sherpa
{"title":"准弹性势垒分布中的缩放特性和等离心近似的有效性:首次实验验证","authors":"Rohan Biswas, S. Nath, J. Gehlot, Gonika, Chandra Kumar, A. Parihari, N. Madhavan, A. Vinayak, Amritraj Mahato, Shoaib Noor, Phurba Sherpa","doi":"10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01380-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For the first time, we have simultaneously measured fusion and quasielastic excitation functions for an intermediate mass system for angular momentum, <span>\\(\\ell \\sim 0\\)</span> using a recoil mass spectrometer. We have extracted barrier distributions using three different sets of data recorded simultaneously for the reaction <span>\\(^{16}\\)</span>O+<span>\\(^{142}\\)</span>Ce: (a) fusion excitation function from measurement of evaporation residues at angle, <span>\\(\\theta _{\\text {lab}} = 0^{\\circ }\\)</span>, (b) quasielastic excitation function at center of mass scattering angle, <span>\\(\\theta _{\\text {c.m.}} = \\pi \\)</span> via measurement of scattered target-like ions at <span>\\(\\theta _{\\text {lab}} = 0^{\\circ }\\)</span> and (c) quasielastic excitation functions from measurement of scattered projectile-like ions at two large angles. We show that the four barrier distributions yield nearly identical results with a single peak. However, the centroids of the barriers extracted from quasielastic data at large angles are lower by <span>\\(\\sim 600\\)</span> keV compared to the same of the barriers extracted from fusion and quasielastic data for <span>\\(\\ell \\sim 0\\)</span>. This is the first experimental verification of the validity of scaling property with respect to <span>\\(\\ell \\)</span> and iso-centrifugal approximation in extracting fusion barrier distribution from quasielastic scattering. This work also points to the importance of extracting barrier distribution from quasielastic measurements at <span>\\(\\theta _{\\mathrm {c.m.}} = \\pi \\)</span> for systems for which measuring fusion excitation function with high precision is not feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":786,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal A","volume":"60 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of scaling property and iso-centrifugal approximation in quasielastic barrier distribution: the first experimental verification\",\"authors\":\"Rohan Biswas, S. Nath, J. Gehlot, Gonika, Chandra Kumar, A. Parihari, N. Madhavan, A. Vinayak, Amritraj Mahato, Shoaib Noor, Phurba Sherpa\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01380-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For the first time, we have simultaneously measured fusion and quasielastic excitation functions for an intermediate mass system for angular momentum, <span>\\\\(\\\\ell \\\\sim 0\\\\)</span> using a recoil mass spectrometer. We have extracted barrier distributions using three different sets of data recorded simultaneously for the reaction <span>\\\\(^{16}\\\\)</span>O+<span>\\\\(^{142}\\\\)</span>Ce: (a) fusion excitation function from measurement of evaporation residues at angle, <span>\\\\(\\\\theta _{\\\\text {lab}} = 0^{\\\\circ }\\\\)</span>, (b) quasielastic excitation function at center of mass scattering angle, <span>\\\\(\\\\theta _{\\\\text {c.m.}} = \\\\pi \\\\)</span> via measurement of scattered target-like ions at <span>\\\\(\\\\theta _{\\\\text {lab}} = 0^{\\\\circ }\\\\)</span> and (c) quasielastic excitation functions from measurement of scattered projectile-like ions at two large angles. We show that the four barrier distributions yield nearly identical results with a single peak. However, the centroids of the barriers extracted from quasielastic data at large angles are lower by <span>\\\\(\\\\sim 600\\\\)</span> keV compared to the same of the barriers extracted from fusion and quasielastic data for <span>\\\\(\\\\ell \\\\sim 0\\\\)</span>. This is the first experimental verification of the validity of scaling property with respect to <span>\\\\(\\\\ell \\\\)</span> and iso-centrifugal approximation in extracting fusion barrier distribution from quasielastic scattering. This work also points to the importance of extracting barrier distribution from quasielastic measurements at <span>\\\\(\\\\theta _{\\\\mathrm {c.m.}} = \\\\pi \\\\)</span> for systems for which measuring fusion excitation function with high precision is not feasible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal A\",\"volume\":\"60 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01380-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal A","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01380-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity of scaling property and iso-centrifugal approximation in quasielastic barrier distribution: the first experimental verification
For the first time, we have simultaneously measured fusion and quasielastic excitation functions for an intermediate mass system for angular momentum, \(\ell \sim 0\) using a recoil mass spectrometer. We have extracted barrier distributions using three different sets of data recorded simultaneously for the reaction \(^{16}\)O+\(^{142}\)Ce: (a) fusion excitation function from measurement of evaporation residues at angle, \(\theta _{\text {lab}} = 0^{\circ }\), (b) quasielastic excitation function at center of mass scattering angle, \(\theta _{\text {c.m.}} = \pi \) via measurement of scattered target-like ions at \(\theta _{\text {lab}} = 0^{\circ }\) and (c) quasielastic excitation functions from measurement of scattered projectile-like ions at two large angles. We show that the four barrier distributions yield nearly identical results with a single peak. However, the centroids of the barriers extracted from quasielastic data at large angles are lower by \(\sim 600\) keV compared to the same of the barriers extracted from fusion and quasielastic data for \(\ell \sim 0\). This is the first experimental verification of the validity of scaling property with respect to \(\ell \) and iso-centrifugal approximation in extracting fusion barrier distribution from quasielastic scattering. This work also points to the importance of extracting barrier distribution from quasielastic measurements at \(\theta _{\mathrm {c.m.}} = \pi \) for systems for which measuring fusion excitation function with high precision is not feasible.
期刊介绍:
Hadron Physics
Hadron Structure
Hadron Spectroscopy
Hadronic and Electroweak Interactions of Hadrons
Nonperturbative Approaches to QCD
Phenomenological Approaches to Hadron Physics
Nuclear and Quark Matter
Heavy-Ion Collisions
Phase Diagram of the Strong Interaction
Hard Probes
Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Matter
Relativistic Transport and Hydrodynamics
Compact Stars
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Structure and Reactions
Few-Body Systems
Radioactive Beams
Electroweak Interactions
Nuclear Astrophysics
Article Categories
Letters (Open Access)
Regular Articles
New Tools and Techniques
Reviews.