低碳农业技术对农民福利的影响:亚洲案例的元回归分析

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
{"title":"低碳农业技术对农民福利的影响:亚洲案例的元回归分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What is the performance of Low Carbon Agricultural Technologies (LCAT) adoption on farmers' welfare? Although there is a substantial amount of information available, there is still a continuing discussion regarding the capacity of LCAT to enhance agricultural productivity, improve farmers' quality of life, and mitigate environmental damage. In order to draw reliable conclusions about the impacts of LCAT and understand the reasons for heterogeneous effects across different studies, we employ a meta-regression to conduct a thorough analysis of 60 empirical studies conducted in the Asian region. The findings suggest that the implementation of LCAT has no significant effect on the overall welfare of farmers in terms of their collective social, economic, and ecological dimensions. However, whether examining the economic or social consequences individually, LCAT demonstrates positive results. The magnitude of these outcomes varies depending on several characteristics. Specifically, studies based on plot-level data, conducted in the rest of Asia, excluding South and East Asia, with the “economic effects” category such as income and profits as the dependent variables, involving younger and less-educated farmers, larger cultivation areas, and LCAT with comprehensive attributes, tend to show more significantly positive effects. Furthermore, a significant “U” relationship can be observed between per capita GDP and the positive effects of LCAT adoption. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the welfare effects of LCAT adoption by considering comprehensive factors such as farmers' characteristics and regional environmental conditions. Policymakers should carefully tailor suitable LCAT for specific circumstances, ultimately striving to achieve agricultural carbon reduction, enhancement of carbon sequestration, and an overall improvement in farmers' welfare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance of low carbon agricultural technologies on farmers' welfare: A meta-regression analysis of Asian cases\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>What is the performance of Low Carbon Agricultural Technologies (LCAT) adoption on farmers' welfare? Although there is a substantial amount of information available, there is still a continuing discussion regarding the capacity of LCAT to enhance agricultural productivity, improve farmers' quality of life, and mitigate environmental damage. In order to draw reliable conclusions about the impacts of LCAT and understand the reasons for heterogeneous effects across different studies, we employ a meta-regression to conduct a thorough analysis of 60 empirical studies conducted in the Asian region. The findings suggest that the implementation of LCAT has no significant effect on the overall welfare of farmers in terms of their collective social, economic, and ecological dimensions. However, whether examining the economic or social consequences individually, LCAT demonstrates positive results. The magnitude of these outcomes varies depending on several characteristics. Specifically, studies based on plot-level data, conducted in the rest of Asia, excluding South and East Asia, with the “economic effects” category such as income and profits as the dependent variables, involving younger and less-educated farmers, larger cultivation areas, and LCAT with comprehensive attributes, tend to show more significantly positive effects. Furthermore, a significant “U” relationship can be observed between per capita GDP and the positive effects of LCAT adoption. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the welfare effects of LCAT adoption by considering comprehensive factors such as farmers' characteristics and regional environmental conditions. Policymakers should carefully tailor suitable LCAT for specific circumstances, ultimately striving to achieve agricultural carbon reduction, enhancement of carbon sequestration, and an overall improvement in farmers' welfare.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用低碳农业技术对农民福利的影响如何?尽管目前已有大量资料,但关于低碳农业技术在提高农业生产率、改善农民生活质量和减轻环境破坏方面的能力,讨论仍在继续。为了对 LCAT 的影响得出可靠的结论,并了解不同研究产生不同影响的原因,我们采用元回归法对亚洲地区进行的 60 项实证研究进行了深入分析。研究结果表明,从集体社会、经济和生态层面来看,实施 LCAT 对农民的整体福利没有显著影响。然而,无论是单独研究经济还是社会后果,LCAT 都显示出积极的效果。这些结果的程度因若干特征而异。具体而言,在除南亚和东亚以外的亚洲其他地区进行的基于地块级数据的研究,以收入和利润等 "经济效应 "类别作为因变量,涉及年轻和受教育程度较低的农民、较大的种植面积以及具有综合属性的 LCAT,往往会显示出更显著的积极效应。此外,在人均 GDP 与采用 LCAT 的积极效应之间,可以观察到明显的 "U "型关系。因此,考虑农民特点和区域环境条件等综合因素,全面评估采用 LCAT 的福利效应至关重要。政策制定者应根据具体情况精心定制合适的低碳农业技术,最终实现农业减碳、加强碳固存、全面提高农民福利的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The performance of low carbon agricultural technologies on farmers' welfare: A meta-regression analysis of Asian cases

What is the performance of Low Carbon Agricultural Technologies (LCAT) adoption on farmers' welfare? Although there is a substantial amount of information available, there is still a continuing discussion regarding the capacity of LCAT to enhance agricultural productivity, improve farmers' quality of life, and mitigate environmental damage. In order to draw reliable conclusions about the impacts of LCAT and understand the reasons for heterogeneous effects across different studies, we employ a meta-regression to conduct a thorough analysis of 60 empirical studies conducted in the Asian region. The findings suggest that the implementation of LCAT has no significant effect on the overall welfare of farmers in terms of their collective social, economic, and ecological dimensions. However, whether examining the economic or social consequences individually, LCAT demonstrates positive results. The magnitude of these outcomes varies depending on several characteristics. Specifically, studies based on plot-level data, conducted in the rest of Asia, excluding South and East Asia, with the “economic effects” category such as income and profits as the dependent variables, involving younger and less-educated farmers, larger cultivation areas, and LCAT with comprehensive attributes, tend to show more significantly positive effects. Furthermore, a significant “U” relationship can be observed between per capita GDP and the positive effects of LCAT adoption. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the welfare effects of LCAT adoption by considering comprehensive factors such as farmers' characteristics and regional environmental conditions. Policymakers should carefully tailor suitable LCAT for specific circumstances, ultimately striving to achieve agricultural carbon reduction, enhancement of carbon sequestration, and an overall improvement in farmers' welfare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信