{"title":"低碳农业技术对农民福利的影响:亚洲案例的元回归分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What is the performance of Low Carbon Agricultural Technologies (LCAT) adoption on farmers' welfare? Although there is a substantial amount of information available, there is still a continuing discussion regarding the capacity of LCAT to enhance agricultural productivity, improve farmers' quality of life, and mitigate environmental damage. In order to draw reliable conclusions about the impacts of LCAT and understand the reasons for heterogeneous effects across different studies, we employ a meta-regression to conduct a thorough analysis of 60 empirical studies conducted in the Asian region. The findings suggest that the implementation of LCAT has no significant effect on the overall welfare of farmers in terms of their collective social, economic, and ecological dimensions. However, whether examining the economic or social consequences individually, LCAT demonstrates positive results. The magnitude of these outcomes varies depending on several characteristics. Specifically, studies based on plot-level data, conducted in the rest of Asia, excluding South and East Asia, with the “economic effects” category such as income and profits as the dependent variables, involving younger and less-educated farmers, larger cultivation areas, and LCAT with comprehensive attributes, tend to show more significantly positive effects. Furthermore, a significant “U” relationship can be observed between per capita GDP and the positive effects of LCAT adoption. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the welfare effects of LCAT adoption by considering comprehensive factors such as farmers' characteristics and regional environmental conditions. Policymakers should carefully tailor suitable LCAT for specific circumstances, ultimately striving to achieve agricultural carbon reduction, enhancement of carbon sequestration, and an overall improvement in farmers' welfare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance of low carbon agricultural technologies on farmers' welfare: A meta-regression analysis of Asian cases\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>What is the performance of Low Carbon Agricultural Technologies (LCAT) adoption on farmers' welfare? Although there is a substantial amount of information available, there is still a continuing discussion regarding the capacity of LCAT to enhance agricultural productivity, improve farmers' quality of life, and mitigate environmental damage. In order to draw reliable conclusions about the impacts of LCAT and understand the reasons for heterogeneous effects across different studies, we employ a meta-regression to conduct a thorough analysis of 60 empirical studies conducted in the Asian region. The findings suggest that the implementation of LCAT has no significant effect on the overall welfare of farmers in terms of their collective social, economic, and ecological dimensions. However, whether examining the economic or social consequences individually, LCAT demonstrates positive results. The magnitude of these outcomes varies depending on several characteristics. Specifically, studies based on plot-level data, conducted in the rest of Asia, excluding South and East Asia, with the “economic effects” category such as income and profits as the dependent variables, involving younger and less-educated farmers, larger cultivation areas, and LCAT with comprehensive attributes, tend to show more significantly positive effects. Furthermore, a significant “U” relationship can be observed between per capita GDP and the positive effects of LCAT adoption. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the welfare effects of LCAT adoption by considering comprehensive factors such as farmers' characteristics and regional environmental conditions. Policymakers should carefully tailor suitable LCAT for specific circumstances, ultimately striving to achieve agricultural carbon reduction, enhancement of carbon sequestration, and an overall improvement in farmers' welfare.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The performance of low carbon agricultural technologies on farmers' welfare: A meta-regression analysis of Asian cases
What is the performance of Low Carbon Agricultural Technologies (LCAT) adoption on farmers' welfare? Although there is a substantial amount of information available, there is still a continuing discussion regarding the capacity of LCAT to enhance agricultural productivity, improve farmers' quality of life, and mitigate environmental damage. In order to draw reliable conclusions about the impacts of LCAT and understand the reasons for heterogeneous effects across different studies, we employ a meta-regression to conduct a thorough analysis of 60 empirical studies conducted in the Asian region. The findings suggest that the implementation of LCAT has no significant effect on the overall welfare of farmers in terms of their collective social, economic, and ecological dimensions. However, whether examining the economic or social consequences individually, LCAT demonstrates positive results. The magnitude of these outcomes varies depending on several characteristics. Specifically, studies based on plot-level data, conducted in the rest of Asia, excluding South and East Asia, with the “economic effects” category such as income and profits as the dependent variables, involving younger and less-educated farmers, larger cultivation areas, and LCAT with comprehensive attributes, tend to show more significantly positive effects. Furthermore, a significant “U” relationship can be observed between per capita GDP and the positive effects of LCAT adoption. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the welfare effects of LCAT adoption by considering comprehensive factors such as farmers' characteristics and regional environmental conditions. Policymakers should carefully tailor suitable LCAT for specific circumstances, ultimately striving to achieve agricultural carbon reduction, enhancement of carbon sequestration, and an overall improvement in farmers' welfare.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.