质子立体定向体放射治疗的初步经验和患者耐受性。

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Naba Ali, Jun Zhou, Bree R Eaton, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Yichun Cao, William A Stokes, Pretesh R Patel, Katja M Langen, Roelf Slopsema, Jeffrey D Bradley, Mark W McDonald
{"title":"质子立体定向体放射治疗的初步经验和患者耐受性。","authors":"Naba Ali, Jun Zhou, Bree R Eaton, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Yichun Cao, William A Stokes, Pretesh R Patel, Katja M Langen, Roelf Slopsema, Jeffrey D Bradley, Mark W McDonald","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Naba Ali, Jun Zhou, Bree R Eaton, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Yichun Cao, William A Stokes, Pretesh R Patel, Katja M Langen, Roelf Slopsema, Jeffrey D Bradley, Mark W McDonald\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"121-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾我们使用质子SBRT的初步经验,评估计划结果和患者对治疗的初步耐受性:从2019年9月至2020年12月,52名患者接受了质子SBRT治疗,共治疗62个病灶。分次因适应症和部位而异,中位分次为 5 次,中位分次剂量为 8 Gy。对计划结果进行了评估,包括计划异质性、一致性和接受100%处方剂量的PTV体积(PTV V100%)。对急性毒性进行了前瞻性记录,并使用MD安德森症状量表(MDASI)和EQ-5D5L视觉模拟评分(VAS)对治疗前和治疗结束时的患者报告结果进行了评估:所有接受治疗的患者都完成了质子SBRT疗程。平均符合性指数为1.05(范围为0.51-1.48)。R50%值与理想的光子参数相当。PTV V100% 平均为 89.9%(40.44% - 99.76%)。5名患者(10%)因设置或肿瘤变化而需要修改计划。没有患者在治疗期间出现新的 3 级或以上毒性。比较治疗前和治疗结束时点,VAS平均值有显著改善(从65分到75分,p = 0.014),MDASI症状(1.7,1.8;p = 0.79)或干扰(2.3,2.4;p = 0.452)平均值无显著变化:结论:基于质子的SBRT可以达到主要临床光子试验所要求的剂量学目标。结论:基于质子的 SBRT 可以达到主要临床光子试验所要求的剂量目标,其耐受性良好,患者报告的结果无下降,SBRT 结束时 VAS 平均改善 10 分。肿瘤控制和后期效应分析需要进一步的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Purpose: To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.

Patients and methods: From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).

Results: All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.

Conclusion: Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信