通过 LC-MS/MS 评估∆9-四氢大麻酚和∆9-四氢大麻酚COOH 的偏差、精确度以及固体组织匀浆和上清液之间的电离抑制/增强。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Michael Fagiola, Rebecca Phipps
{"title":"通过 LC-MS/MS 评估∆9-四氢大麻酚和∆9-四氢大麻酚COOH 的偏差、精确度以及固体组织匀浆和上清液之间的电离抑制/增强。","authors":"Michael Fagiola, Rebecca Phipps","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) assays are frequently utilized for screening and confirmatory purposes in the forensic toxicology laboratory. While these techniques are excellent for the targeted identification and quantitation of a wide variety of drug classes, validation and determining fit-for-purpose is a significant requirement for each method. In the USA, the American National Standards Institute and Academy Standards Board first edition of Standard 036 currently serves as a primary resource in forensic toxicology method validation and mandates that laboratories evaluate critical performance characteristics to help ensure the production of forensically defensible results. Due to the variability of specimen quality frequently encountered in the discipline of postmortem toxicology, the State of Maryland Office of the Chief Medical Examiner Forensic Toxicology Laboratory routinely analyzes solid tissue specimens as part of the medicolegal death investigation process and evaluates liver as a representative solid tissue matrix during method validation. Authentic postmortem specimens (e.g. liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, and spleen) were used to investigate the effects of analyzing solid tissue homogenate versus solid tissue supernatant on bias, precision, and ionization suppression/enhancement of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH. Bias was <20% for Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in liver homogenate and supernatant with a single exception of the low QC concentration for Δ9-THC in liver homogenate (-29%). Within-run and between-run CV was <20% for Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in liver homogenate and supernatant. Δ9-THC and Δ9-THC-d3 exhibited significant ion suppression in both liver homogenate and supernatant, while Δ9-THCCOOH and Δ9-THCCOOH-d3 showed both ion suppression and enhancement in these matrices. Noticeable quantitative differences were observed in authentic postmortem solid tissue homogenate and supernatant specimens despite evaluating identical tissue samplings. A brief discussion of the results is presented using a validated LC-MS-MS method for the confirmation and quantitation of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in postmortem casework.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"616-624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH bias, precision, and ionization suppression/enhancement between solid tissue homogenate and supernatant by LC-MS-MS.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Fagiola, Rebecca Phipps\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkae066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) assays are frequently utilized for screening and confirmatory purposes in the forensic toxicology laboratory. While these techniques are excellent for the targeted identification and quantitation of a wide variety of drug classes, validation and determining fit-for-purpose is a significant requirement for each method. In the USA, the American National Standards Institute and Academy Standards Board first edition of Standard 036 currently serves as a primary resource in forensic toxicology method validation and mandates that laboratories evaluate critical performance characteristics to help ensure the production of forensically defensible results. Due to the variability of specimen quality frequently encountered in the discipline of postmortem toxicology, the State of Maryland Office of the Chief Medical Examiner Forensic Toxicology Laboratory routinely analyzes solid tissue specimens as part of the medicolegal death investigation process and evaluates liver as a representative solid tissue matrix during method validation. Authentic postmortem specimens (e.g. liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, and spleen) were used to investigate the effects of analyzing solid tissue homogenate versus solid tissue supernatant on bias, precision, and ionization suppression/enhancement of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH. Bias was <20% for Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in liver homogenate and supernatant with a single exception of the low QC concentration for Δ9-THC in liver homogenate (-29%). Within-run and between-run CV was <20% for Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in liver homogenate and supernatant. Δ9-THC and Δ9-THC-d3 exhibited significant ion suppression in both liver homogenate and supernatant, while Δ9-THCCOOH and Δ9-THCCOOH-d3 showed both ion suppression and enhancement in these matrices. Noticeable quantitative differences were observed in authentic postmortem solid tissue homogenate and supernatant specimens despite evaluating identical tissue samplings. A brief discussion of the results is presented using a validated LC-MS-MS method for the confirmation and quantitation of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in postmortem casework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"616-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法医毒理学实验室中,LC-MS-MS 检测法经常用于筛选和确认目的。虽然这些技术在有针对性地鉴定和定量各种药物类别方面表现出色,但每种方法都需要进行验证和确定是否符合目的。在美国,ANSI/ASB 标准 036 目前是法医毒理学方法验证的主要资源,它要求实验室评估关键的性能特征,以帮助确保产生法医上可辩护的结果。由于在死后毒理学学科中经常会遇到标本质量多变的情况,[作者信息已删除] 首席法医毒理学实验室在法医死亡调查过程中会对实体组织标本进行常规分析,并在方法验证过程中将肝脏作为具有代表性的实体组织基质进行评估。使用真实的死后标本(如肝脏、肾脏、骨骼肌和脾脏)来研究分析固体组织匀浆与固体组织上清液对 ∆9-THC 和 ∆9-THCCOOH 的偏差、精确度和电离抑制/增强的影响。偏差为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH bias, precision, and ionization suppression/enhancement between solid tissue homogenate and supernatant by LC-MS-MS.

Liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) assays are frequently utilized for screening and confirmatory purposes in the forensic toxicology laboratory. While these techniques are excellent for the targeted identification and quantitation of a wide variety of drug classes, validation and determining fit-for-purpose is a significant requirement for each method. In the USA, the American National Standards Institute and Academy Standards Board first edition of Standard 036 currently serves as a primary resource in forensic toxicology method validation and mandates that laboratories evaluate critical performance characteristics to help ensure the production of forensically defensible results. Due to the variability of specimen quality frequently encountered in the discipline of postmortem toxicology, the State of Maryland Office of the Chief Medical Examiner Forensic Toxicology Laboratory routinely analyzes solid tissue specimens as part of the medicolegal death investigation process and evaluates liver as a representative solid tissue matrix during method validation. Authentic postmortem specimens (e.g. liver, kidney, skeletal muscle, and spleen) were used to investigate the effects of analyzing solid tissue homogenate versus solid tissue supernatant on bias, precision, and ionization suppression/enhancement of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH. Bias was <20% for Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in liver homogenate and supernatant with a single exception of the low QC concentration for Δ9-THC in liver homogenate (-29%). Within-run and between-run CV was <20% for Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in liver homogenate and supernatant. Δ9-THC and Δ9-THC-d3 exhibited significant ion suppression in both liver homogenate and supernatant, while Δ9-THCCOOH and Δ9-THCCOOH-d3 showed both ion suppression and enhancement in these matrices. Noticeable quantitative differences were observed in authentic postmortem solid tissue homogenate and supernatant specimens despite evaluating identical tissue samplings. A brief discussion of the results is presented using a validated LC-MS-MS method for the confirmation and quantitation of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCCOOH in postmortem casework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信