实验性树脂封固剂 (Resil) 和 AH-26 对术后疼痛的影响:随机对照临床试验。

Q3 Dentistry
Nazanin Zargar, Hengameh Ashraf, Saeede Zadsirjan, Farhood Najafi, Siavash Jafari Semnani, Omid Dianat, Pegah Mehrabinia
{"title":"实验性树脂封固剂 (Resil) 和 AH-26 对术后疼痛的影响:随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Nazanin Zargar, Hengameh Ashraf, Saeede Zadsirjan, Farhood Najafi, Siavash Jafari Semnani, Omid Dianat, Pegah Mehrabinia","doi":"10.22037/iej.v19i3.44301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the most common problems in endodontic treatments is post-treatment pain, and sealers might be one of the factors influencing the degree of pain following root canal therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare pain following endodontic treatment using an AH-26 resin sealer against the Resil experimental sealer in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first or second molar were randomly divided into two groups (<i>n</i>=50) based on the type of sealer applied. Two postgraduate students with at least five years of experience treated all patients. All patients had a single root canal treatment. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption were assessed after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after the treatment. The data were statistically analyzed by Fisher's exact or Chi-Square test (to compare the distribution of qualitative variables in two groups), repeated measures ANOVA (to compare changes in pain intensity over time in two groups), Boneferronie (for pairwise comparisons), Friedman, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests (for assessment of the changes in pain scores over time). The generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used for assessing time and group effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between groups at any of the time points studied (<i>P</i>>0.05), and also for patient analgesic consumption between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Both groups recorded the maximum pain levels in the first 6 hours. For each subsequent day postoperatively, the odds ratio (OR) of not using analgesics was 2.078.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resil and AH-26 perform similarly in terms of the occurrence and intensity of postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14534,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","volume":"19 3","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of an Experimental Resin-based Sealer (Resil) and AH-26 on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nazanin Zargar, Hengameh Ashraf, Saeede Zadsirjan, Farhood Najafi, Siavash Jafari Semnani, Omid Dianat, Pegah Mehrabinia\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/iej.v19i3.44301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the most common problems in endodontic treatments is post-treatment pain, and sealers might be one of the factors influencing the degree of pain following root canal therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare pain following endodontic treatment using an AH-26 resin sealer against the Resil experimental sealer in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first or second molar were randomly divided into two groups (<i>n</i>=50) based on the type of sealer applied. Two postgraduate students with at least five years of experience treated all patients. All patients had a single root canal treatment. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption were assessed after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after the treatment. The data were statistically analyzed by Fisher's exact or Chi-Square test (to compare the distribution of qualitative variables in two groups), repeated measures ANOVA (to compare changes in pain intensity over time in two groups), Boneferronie (for pairwise comparisons), Friedman, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests (for assessment of the changes in pain scores over time). The generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used for assessing time and group effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between groups at any of the time points studied (<i>P</i>>0.05), and also for patient analgesic consumption between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). Both groups recorded the maximum pain levels in the first 6 hours. For each subsequent day postoperatively, the odds ratio (OR) of not using analgesics was 2.078.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resil and AH-26 perform similarly in terms of the occurrence and intensity of postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"139-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v19i3.44301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v19i3.44301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:根管治疗中最常见的问题之一是治疗后疼痛,而封闭剂可能是影响根管治疗后疼痛程度的因素之一。本研究的目的是比较在患有不可逆牙髓炎的下颌磨牙中使用 AH-26 树脂封闭剂和 Resil 实验性封闭剂进行根管治疗后的疼痛情况:100 名下颌第一或第二磨牙不可逆牙髓炎患者根据封闭剂类型随机分为两组(n=50)。由两名至少有五年经验的研究生对所有患者进行治疗。所有患者均接受了一次根管治疗。在治疗后 6、12、24 和 48 小时以及 3、4、5、6 和 7 天后,对术后疼痛评分和镇痛剂消耗量进行了评估。数据的统计分析采用费雪精确检验或齐方差检验(比较两组定性变量的分布)、重复测量方差分析(比较两组疼痛强度随时间的变化)、Boneferronie 检验(用于配对比较)、Friedman 检验、Wilcoxon 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验(评估疼痛评分随时间的变化)。采用广义估计方程(GEE)评估时间和组别效应:结果:在研究的任何时间点,组间术后疼痛均无明显差异(P>0.05),组间患者镇痛剂用量也无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组患者在最初 6 小时内的疼痛程度均达到最高值。结论:Resil 和 AH-26 在术后每一天不使用镇痛剂的几率比(OR)为 2.078:Resil和AH-26在不可逆性牙髓炎下颌磨牙术后疼痛的发生率和强度方面表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of an Experimental Resin-based Sealer (Resil) and AH-26 on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Introduction: One of the most common problems in endodontic treatments is post-treatment pain, and sealers might be one of the factors influencing the degree of pain following root canal therapy. The purpose of this study is to compare pain following endodontic treatment using an AH-26 resin sealer against the Resil experimental sealer in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.

Materials and methods: One hundred patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first or second molar were randomly divided into two groups (n=50) based on the type of sealer applied. Two postgraduate students with at least five years of experience treated all patients. All patients had a single root canal treatment. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption were assessed after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after the treatment. The data were statistically analyzed by Fisher's exact or Chi-Square test (to compare the distribution of qualitative variables in two groups), repeated measures ANOVA (to compare changes in pain intensity over time in two groups), Boneferronie (for pairwise comparisons), Friedman, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests (for assessment of the changes in pain scores over time). The generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used for assessing time and group effects.

Results: There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between groups at any of the time points studied (P>0.05), and also for patient analgesic consumption between groups (P>0.05). Both groups recorded the maximum pain levels in the first 6 hours. For each subsequent day postoperatively, the odds ratio (OR) of not using analgesics was 2.078.

Conclusion: Resil and AH-26 perform similarly in terms of the occurrence and intensity of postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Endodontic Journal (IEJ) is an international peer-reviewed biomedical publication, the aim of which is to provide a scientific medium of communication for researchers throughout the globe. IEJ aims to publish the highest quality articles, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Endodontics. The journal is an official Journal of the Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (ICER) and the Iranian Association of Endodontists (IAE). The Journal welcomes articles related to the scientific or applied aspects of endodontics e.g. original researches, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review articles, clinical trials, case series/reports, hypotheses, letters to the editor, etc. From the beginning (i.e. since 2006), the IEJ was the first open access endodontic journal in the world, which gave readers free and instant access to published articles and enabling them faster discovery of the latest endodontic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信