情绪障碍患者对人际和社会节奏疗法反应的认知预测因素。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bipolar Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/bdi.13469
Samantha J Groves, Katie M Douglas, Marie T Crowe, Maree Inder, Jenny Jordan, Dave Carlyle, Ben Beaglehole, Roger Mulder, Cameron Lacey, Sue Luty, Kate Eggleston, Chris Frampton, Christopher R Bowie, Richard J Porter
{"title":"情绪障碍患者对人际和社会节奏疗法反应的认知预测因素。","authors":"Samantha J Groves, Katie M Douglas, Marie T Crowe, Maree Inder, Jenny Jordan, Dave Carlyle, Ben Beaglehole, Roger Mulder, Cameron Lacey, Sue Luty, Kate Eggleston, Chris Frampton, Christopher R Bowie, Richard J Porter","doi":"10.1111/bdi.13469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been increasing interest in examining the potential moderating effects that cognitive functioning has on treatment outcome in bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Therefore, the aim of this exploratory study was to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function and treatment outcome in individuals with mood disorders who completed 12 months of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT), and were randomised to receive adjunctive cognitive remediation (CR) or no additional intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight patients with mood disorders (BD, n = 36, MDD, n = 22), who were randomised to IPSRT-CR or IPSRT, underwent cognitive testing at baseline and completed follow-up mood measures after 12 months. General linear modelling was used to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function (both objective and subjective) and change in mood symptom burden, and functioning, from baseline to treatment-end.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Poorer baseline attention/executive function was associated with less change in mood symptom burden, particularly depressive symptoms, at treatment-end. Additionally, slower psychomotor speed at baseline was associated with less improvement in mania symptom burden. Subjective cognitive function at baseline was not related to change in mood symptom burden at treatment-end, and neither objective nor subjective cognitive function was associated with functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Due to the exploratory nature of the study, there was no correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspects of objective cognitive function were associated with treatment outcomes following psychotherapy. Further large-scale research is required to examine the role that cognitive function may have in determining various aspects of mood disorder recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"708-716"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive predictors of response to interpersonal and social rhythm therapy in mood disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha J Groves, Katie M Douglas, Marie T Crowe, Maree Inder, Jenny Jordan, Dave Carlyle, Ben Beaglehole, Roger Mulder, Cameron Lacey, Sue Luty, Kate Eggleston, Chris Frampton, Christopher R Bowie, Richard J Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bdi.13469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been increasing interest in examining the potential moderating effects that cognitive functioning has on treatment outcome in bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Therefore, the aim of this exploratory study was to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function and treatment outcome in individuals with mood disorders who completed 12 months of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT), and were randomised to receive adjunctive cognitive remediation (CR) or no additional intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight patients with mood disorders (BD, n = 36, MDD, n = 22), who were randomised to IPSRT-CR or IPSRT, underwent cognitive testing at baseline and completed follow-up mood measures after 12 months. General linear modelling was used to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function (both objective and subjective) and change in mood symptom burden, and functioning, from baseline to treatment-end.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Poorer baseline attention/executive function was associated with less change in mood symptom burden, particularly depressive symptoms, at treatment-end. Additionally, slower psychomotor speed at baseline was associated with less improvement in mania symptom burden. Subjective cognitive function at baseline was not related to change in mood symptom burden at treatment-end, and neither objective nor subjective cognitive function was associated with functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Due to the exploratory nature of the study, there was no correction for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspects of objective cognitive function were associated with treatment outcomes following psychotherapy. Further large-scale research is required to examine the role that cognitive function may have in determining various aspects of mood disorder recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"708-716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13469\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们越来越关注研究认知功能对双相情感障碍(BD)和重度抑郁障碍(MDD)治疗结果的潜在调节作用。因此,本探索性研究的目的是考察完成 12 个月人际和社会节奏疗法(IPSRT)的情绪障碍患者的基线认知功能与治疗结果之间的关系,并随机选择接受辅助认知矫正(CR)或不接受额外干预:58名情绪障碍患者(BD,36人;MDD,22人)被随机分配接受IPSRT-CR或IPSRT治疗,他们在基线时接受了认知测试,并在12个月后完成了后续情绪测量。研究采用一般线性模型来检验基线认知功能(客观和主观)与情绪症状负担和功能变化之间从基线到治疗结束的关系:结果:基线注意力/执行功能较差与治疗结束时情绪症状负担(尤其是抑郁症状)的变化较小有关。此外,基线时精神运动速度较慢也与躁狂症症状负担的改善程度较低有关。基线时的主观认知功能与治疗结束时情绪症状负担的变化无关,客观和主观认知功能均与功能结果无关:结论:客观认知功能的各个方面与功能性结局相关:结论:客观认知功能的各个方面与心理治疗后的疗效有关。需要进一步开展大规模研究,探讨认知功能在决定情绪障碍康复的各个方面可能发挥的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive predictors of response to interpersonal and social rhythm therapy in mood disorders.

Background: There has been increasing interest in examining the potential moderating effects that cognitive functioning has on treatment outcome in bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Therefore, the aim of this exploratory study was to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function and treatment outcome in individuals with mood disorders who completed 12 months of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy (IPSRT), and were randomised to receive adjunctive cognitive remediation (CR) or no additional intervention.

Methods: Fifty-eight patients with mood disorders (BD, n = 36, MDD, n = 22), who were randomised to IPSRT-CR or IPSRT, underwent cognitive testing at baseline and completed follow-up mood measures after 12 months. General linear modelling was used to examine the relationship between baseline cognitive function (both objective and subjective) and change in mood symptom burden, and functioning, from baseline to treatment-end.

Results: Poorer baseline attention/executive function was associated with less change in mood symptom burden, particularly depressive symptoms, at treatment-end. Additionally, slower psychomotor speed at baseline was associated with less improvement in mania symptom burden. Subjective cognitive function at baseline was not related to change in mood symptom burden at treatment-end, and neither objective nor subjective cognitive function was associated with functional outcome.

Limitations: Due to the exploratory nature of the study, there was no correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusion: Aspects of objective cognitive function were associated with treatment outcomes following psychotherapy. Further large-scale research is required to examine the role that cognitive function may have in determining various aspects of mood disorder recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信