头孢替坦与头孢西丁加甲硝唑在阴道子宫切除术中的临床和药代动力学比较。

K Engel, W Schmidt, H G Sonntag, F Kees
{"title":"头孢替坦与头孢西丁加甲硝唑在阴道子宫切除术中的临床和药代动力学比较。","authors":"K Engel,&nbsp;W Schmidt,&nbsp;H G Sonntag,&nbsp;F Kees","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a randomised clinical trial, 102 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy were given a single preoperative 2g dose of cefotetan (CTT) (52 pts) or three perioperative 2g doses of cefoxitin (CFX) plus 0.5g metronidazole (50 pts) as antibiotic prophylaxis. No statistically significant differences between the groups were detected in the clinical response (100% for both groups). The incidence of major wound infection (2% CTT and 0% CFX) were also comparable between the two treatment groups; post-operative changes in body temperature, duration of hospitalisation and post-operative urinary tract infections (16% CTT and 20% CFX) were similar. Both drugs were well tolerated. Twenty nine of the 102 patients were further investigated to determine the pharmacokinetics following a single 2g dose of CTT or CFX, in both serum and tissue. Although both antibiotics provided good concentrations during the early phase of surgery, CTT levels persisted for a longer time period. These results confirm that single dose cefotetan is equally as effective and safe as multiple dose cefoxitin plus metronidazole for prophylaxis in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":"7 4","pages":"256-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of cefotetan versus cefoxitin plus metronidazole in vaginal hysterectomy.\",\"authors\":\"K Engel,&nbsp;W Schmidt,&nbsp;H G Sonntag,&nbsp;F Kees\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a randomised clinical trial, 102 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy were given a single preoperative 2g dose of cefotetan (CTT) (52 pts) or three perioperative 2g doses of cefoxitin (CFX) plus 0.5g metronidazole (50 pts) as antibiotic prophylaxis. No statistically significant differences between the groups were detected in the clinical response (100% for both groups). The incidence of major wound infection (2% CTT and 0% CFX) were also comparable between the two treatment groups; post-operative changes in body temperature, duration of hospitalisation and post-operative urinary tract infections (16% CTT and 20% CFX) were similar. Both drugs were well tolerated. Twenty nine of the 102 patients were further investigated to determine the pharmacokinetics following a single 2g dose of CTT or CFX, in both serum and tissue. Although both antibiotics provided good concentrations during the early phase of surgery, CTT levels persisted for a longer time period. These results confirm that single dose cefotetan is equally as effective and safe as multiple dose cefoxitin plus metronidazole for prophylaxis in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"256-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项随机临床试验中,102名接受阴道子宫切除术的妇女术前给予单次2g剂量的头孢替坦(CTT)(52分)或围手术期给予三次2g剂量的头孢西丁(CFX)加0.5g甲硝唑(50分)作为抗生素预防。两组临床反应无统计学差异(两组均为100%)。两个治疗组的严重伤口感染发生率(CTT为2%,CFX为0%)也具有可比性;术后体温变化、住院时间和术后尿路感染(16% CTT和20% CFX)相似。两种药物的耐受性都很好。102例患者中有29例被进一步研究,以确定单剂量2g CTT或CFX在血清和组织中的药代动力学。虽然这两种抗生素在手术早期提供了良好的浓度,但CTT水平持续了更长的时间。这些结果证实,单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁加甲硝唑预防阴道子宫切除术患者同样有效和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of cefotetan versus cefoxitin plus metronidazole in vaginal hysterectomy.

In a randomised clinical trial, 102 women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy were given a single preoperative 2g dose of cefotetan (CTT) (52 pts) or three perioperative 2g doses of cefoxitin (CFX) plus 0.5g metronidazole (50 pts) as antibiotic prophylaxis. No statistically significant differences between the groups were detected in the clinical response (100% for both groups). The incidence of major wound infection (2% CTT and 0% CFX) were also comparable between the two treatment groups; post-operative changes in body temperature, duration of hospitalisation and post-operative urinary tract infections (16% CTT and 20% CFX) were similar. Both drugs were well tolerated. Twenty nine of the 102 patients were further investigated to determine the pharmacokinetics following a single 2g dose of CTT or CFX, in both serum and tissue. Although both antibiotics provided good concentrations during the early phase of surgery, CTT levels persisted for a longer time period. These results confirm that single dose cefotetan is equally as effective and safe as multiple dose cefoxitin plus metronidazole for prophylaxis in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信