当代南非尸体骨骼样本中的颅骨波动不对称及其与非特异性生理压力指标的关系。

IF 1.3 3区 地球科学 Q3 PALEONTOLOGY
{"title":"当代南非尸体骨骼样本中的颅骨波动不对称及其与非特异性生理压力指标的关系。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpp.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Biological anthropologists frequently explore skeletal asymmetry, together with population health and disease. Given the conflicting findings in existing literature, this study aimed to clarify whether an association exists in a South African sample.</p></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><p>Dry bone and cranial micro-focus X-ray Computed Tomography (micro-XCT) scans of 115 South African individuals were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) indices were calculated from interlandmark distances, and the frequency of four types of non-specific signs of physiological stress were documented to explore the relationship between FA and disease.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black South Africans did not exhibit a high FA index; however, they had the highest prevalence of non-specific signs of physiological stress. However, no significant correlations were detected between FA indices and pathological lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No correlation was observed between FA and populations from different socio-economic backgrounds. However, individuals of lower socio-economic status (SES) demonstrated a greater prevalence of non-specific signs of physiological stress.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This research suggests that skeletal indicators of stress may be a suitable biological marker for assessing differences in SES among population groups, while indicating that levels of cranial FA is an inadequate biological marker.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Possible limitations may include measurement error, and the lack of information on the life history and medical records of individuals in this sample.</p></div><div><h3>Suggestions for further research</h3><p>Future research should include a larger sample with more South African groups, and should evaluate the potential association among age, FA, and expression of skeletal markers of disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Paleopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724003036/pdfft?md5=0afb233837cf0a4b80c9b8d0d4273a55&pid=1-s2.0-S1879981724003036-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cranial fluctuating asymmetry and its relationship with non-specific physiological stress indicators in a contemporary South African cadaveric skeletal sample\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpp.2024.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Biological anthropologists frequently explore skeletal asymmetry, together with population health and disease. Given the conflicting findings in existing literature, this study aimed to clarify whether an association exists in a South African sample.</p></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><p>Dry bone and cranial micro-focus X-ray Computed Tomography (micro-XCT) scans of 115 South African individuals were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) indices were calculated from interlandmark distances, and the frequency of four types of non-specific signs of physiological stress were documented to explore the relationship between FA and disease.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Black South Africans did not exhibit a high FA index; however, they had the highest prevalence of non-specific signs of physiological stress. However, no significant correlations were detected between FA indices and pathological lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No correlation was observed between FA and populations from different socio-economic backgrounds. However, individuals of lower socio-economic status (SES) demonstrated a greater prevalence of non-specific signs of physiological stress.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This research suggests that skeletal indicators of stress may be a suitable biological marker for assessing differences in SES among population groups, while indicating that levels of cranial FA is an inadequate biological marker.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Possible limitations may include measurement error, and the lack of information on the life history and medical records of individuals in this sample.</p></div><div><h3>Suggestions for further research</h3><p>Future research should include a larger sample with more South African groups, and should evaluate the potential association among age, FA, and expression of skeletal markers of disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Paleopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724003036/pdfft?md5=0afb233837cf0a4b80c9b8d0d4273a55&pid=1-s2.0-S1879981724003036-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Paleopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724003036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Paleopathology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724003036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:生物人类学家经常研究骨骼不对称与人口健康和疾病的关系。鉴于现有文献中的研究结果相互矛盾,本研究旨在澄清在南非样本中是否存在这种关联:对 115 名南非人的干骨和头颅微焦点 X 射线计算机断层扫描(micro-XCT)进行了评估:方法:根据标记间距离计算波动不对称(FA)指数,并记录四种非特异性生理应激迹象的频率,以探讨FA与疾病之间的关系:结果:南非黑人的 FA 指数并不高,但他们的非特异性生理应激迹象发生率最高。然而,在 FA 指数和病理病变之间没有发现明显的相关性:结论:FA 指数与不同社会经济背景的人群之间没有相关性。结论:FA 指数与不同社会经济背景的人群之间未发现相关性,但社会经济地位较低的人群非特异性生理压力迹象的发生率更高:意义:这项研究表明,骨骼压力指标可能是评估不同人群社会经济地位差异的合适生物标志物,同时也表明颅骨FA水平是一个不适当的生物标志物:局限性:可能的局限性包括测量误差,以及缺乏样本中个人的生活史和医疗记录信息:未来研究应包括更多南非群体的更大样本,并应评估年龄、FA 和骨骼疾病标志物表达之间的潜在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cranial fluctuating asymmetry and its relationship with non-specific physiological stress indicators in a contemporary South African cadaveric skeletal sample

Objectives

Biological anthropologists frequently explore skeletal asymmetry, together with population health and disease. Given the conflicting findings in existing literature, this study aimed to clarify whether an association exists in a South African sample.

Materials

Dry bone and cranial micro-focus X-ray Computed Tomography (micro-XCT) scans of 115 South African individuals were assessed.

Methods

Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) indices were calculated from interlandmark distances, and the frequency of four types of non-specific signs of physiological stress were documented to explore the relationship between FA and disease.

Results

Black South Africans did not exhibit a high FA index; however, they had the highest prevalence of non-specific signs of physiological stress. However, no significant correlations were detected between FA indices and pathological lesions.

Conclusion

No correlation was observed between FA and populations from different socio-economic backgrounds. However, individuals of lower socio-economic status (SES) demonstrated a greater prevalence of non-specific signs of physiological stress.

Significance

This research suggests that skeletal indicators of stress may be a suitable biological marker for assessing differences in SES among population groups, while indicating that levels of cranial FA is an inadequate biological marker.

Limitations

Possible limitations may include measurement error, and the lack of information on the life history and medical records of individuals in this sample.

Suggestions for further research

Future research should include a larger sample with more South African groups, and should evaluate the potential association among age, FA, and expression of skeletal markers of disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Paleopathology is the study and application of methods and techniques for investigating diseases and related conditions from skeletal and soft tissue remains. The International Journal of Paleopathology (IJPP) will publish original and significant articles on human and animal (including hominids) disease, based upon the study of physical remains, including osseous, dental, and preserved soft tissues at a range of methodological levels, from direct observation to molecular, chemical, histological and radiographic analysis. Discussion of ways in which these methods can be applied to the reconstruction of health, disease and life histories in the past is central to the discipline, so the journal would also encourage papers covering interpretive and theoretical issues, and those that place the study of disease at the centre of a bioarchaeological or biocultural approach. Papers dealing with historical evidence relating to disease in the past (rather than history of medicine) will also be published. The journal will also accept significant studies that applied previously developed techniques to new materials, setting the research in the context of current debates on past human and animal health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信