个性化医疗时代软组织肉瘤风险分层的机遇与挑战。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s11864-024-01244-x
Avirup Chowdhury, Khin Thway, Sandro Pasquali, Dario Callegaro, Alessandro Gronchi, Robin L Jones, Paul H Huang
{"title":"个性化医疗时代软组织肉瘤风险分层的机遇与挑战。","authors":"Avirup Chowdhury, Khin Thway, Sandro Pasquali, Dario Callegaro, Alessandro Gronchi, Robin L Jones, Paul H Huang","doi":"10.1007/s11864-024-01244-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of cancers. Treatment options have changed little in the past thirty years, and the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is controversial. Accurate risk stratification is crucial in STS in order to facilitate clinical discussions around peri-operative treatment. Current risk stratification tools used in clinic, such as Sarculator, use clinicopathological characteristics and may be specific to anatomical site or to histology. More recently, risk stratification tools have been developed using molecular or immunological data. Combining Sarculator with other risk stratification tools may identify novel patient groups with differential clinical outcomes. There are several considerations when translating risk stratification tools into widespread clinical use, including establishing clinical utility, health economic value, being applicable to existing clinical pathways, having strong real-world performance, and being supported by investment into infrastructure. Future work may include incorporation of novel modalities and data integration techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":50600,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1124-1135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities and Challenges in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Risk Stratification in the Era of Personalised Medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Avirup Chowdhury, Khin Thway, Sandro Pasquali, Dario Callegaro, Alessandro Gronchi, Robin L Jones, Paul H Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11864-024-01244-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Opinion statement: </strong>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of cancers. Treatment options have changed little in the past thirty years, and the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is controversial. Accurate risk stratification is crucial in STS in order to facilitate clinical discussions around peri-operative treatment. Current risk stratification tools used in clinic, such as Sarculator, use clinicopathological characteristics and may be specific to anatomical site or to histology. More recently, risk stratification tools have been developed using molecular or immunological data. Combining Sarculator with other risk stratification tools may identify novel patient groups with differential clinical outcomes. There are several considerations when translating risk stratification tools into widespread clinical use, including establishing clinical utility, health economic value, being applicable to existing clinical pathways, having strong real-world performance, and being supported by investment into infrastructure. Future work may include incorporation of novel modalities and data integration techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1124-1135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-024-01244-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-024-01244-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意见陈述:软组织肉瘤(STS)是一种罕见的异质性癌症。过去三十年来,治疗方案变化不大,而新辅助化疗的作用则存在争议。对 STS 进行准确的风险分层至关重要,有助于围绕围手术期治疗进行临床讨论。目前临床上使用的风险分层工具,如 Sarculator,使用的是临床病理特征,可能针对解剖部位或组织学。最近,人们利用分子或免疫学数据开发出了风险分层工具。将 Sarculator 与其他风险分层工具相结合,可能会发现具有不同临床结果的新型患者群体。在将风险分层工具转化为广泛的临床应用时,有几个方面需要考虑,包括建立临床效用、卫生经济价值、适用于现有的临床路径、具有强大的真实世界性能以及得到基础设施投资的支持。未来的工作可能包括纳入新型模式和数据整合技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Opportunities and Challenges in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Risk Stratification in the Era of Personalised Medicine.

Opportunities and Challenges in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Risk Stratification in the Era of Personalised Medicine.

Opinion statement: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of cancers. Treatment options have changed little in the past thirty years, and the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is controversial. Accurate risk stratification is crucial in STS in order to facilitate clinical discussions around peri-operative treatment. Current risk stratification tools used in clinic, such as Sarculator, use clinicopathological characteristics and may be specific to anatomical site or to histology. More recently, risk stratification tools have been developed using molecular or immunological data. Combining Sarculator with other risk stratification tools may identify novel patient groups with differential clinical outcomes. There are several considerations when translating risk stratification tools into widespread clinical use, including establishing clinical utility, health economic value, being applicable to existing clinical pathways, having strong real-world performance, and being supported by investment into infrastructure. Future work may include incorporation of novel modalities and data integration techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment option advances in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to facilitate worldwide approaches to cancer treatment. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as endocrine tumors, lymphomas, neuro-oncology, and cancers of the breast, head and neck, lung, skin, gastrointestinal tract, and genitourinary region. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known oncologists, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信