{"title":"评估稳定型青光眼患者 \"imo \"周径 AIZE 快速测试的变异性。","authors":"Atsuko Kitagawa, Go Horiguchi, Hiroki Nomoto, Michiko Shimizu, Mayumi Hironobu, Akemi Ue, Satoshi Teramukai, Chota Matsumoto","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Analysis of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Testing (AIZE) Rapid test variability in patients with stable glaucoma showed that the 95% prediction interval of the mean deviation (MD) value, potentially an index for judging progression, was ±1.63 to ±1.78 dB in early-to-moderate-stage patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the 95% prediction interval of the MD value using the AIZE Rapid test strategy for glaucoma observation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 72 patients with stable or suspected glaucoma who underwent the imo AIZE Rapid test 3 times or more within 2 years. Both eyes from each patient were classified as better or worse eyes. They were divided based on baseline MD values into the following 4 groups: MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB. The variability of MD during the observation period and the 95% prediction intervals were analyzed. Pointwise variability of limits at each test location was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The numbers of better and worse eyes included in the study were 46 and 33. The median follow-up period was 1.3 years (range: 0.5 to 1.9 y). The 95% prediction intervals for MD values were ±1.41 dB for better eyes (n = 46) and ±1.47 dB for worse eyes (n = 33). The 95% prediction intervals in the MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB groups were ±1.63 dB, ±1.34 dB, ±1.78 dB, and ±1.33 dB, respectively. Pointwise variability of worse eyes was larger than that of better eyes, especially between 10 to 15 dB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the case of a difference in MD greater than the 95% prediction intervals when compared with the previous visual field result, we should pay much attention to the possibility of progression of the glaucomatous visual field in patients with stable glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"849-854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Variability of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Rapid Tests on the \\\"imo\\\" Perimeter in Patients With Stable Glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Atsuko Kitagawa, Go Horiguchi, Hiroki Nomoto, Michiko Shimizu, Mayumi Hironobu, Akemi Ue, Satoshi Teramukai, Chota Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Analysis of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Testing (AIZE) Rapid test variability in patients with stable glaucoma showed that the 95% prediction interval of the mean deviation (MD) value, potentially an index for judging progression, was ±1.63 to ±1.78 dB in early-to-moderate-stage patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the 95% prediction interval of the MD value using the AIZE Rapid test strategy for glaucoma observation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study included 72 patients with stable or suspected glaucoma who underwent the imo AIZE Rapid test 3 times or more within 2 years. Both eyes from each patient were classified as better or worse eyes. They were divided based on baseline MD values into the following 4 groups: MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB. The variability of MD during the observation period and the 95% prediction intervals were analyzed. Pointwise variability of limits at each test location was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The numbers of better and worse eyes included in the study were 46 and 33. The median follow-up period was 1.3 years (range: 0.5 to 1.9 y). The 95% prediction intervals for MD values were ±1.41 dB for better eyes (n = 46) and ±1.47 dB for worse eyes (n = 33). The 95% prediction intervals in the MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB groups were ±1.63 dB, ±1.34 dB, ±1.78 dB, and ±1.33 dB, respectively. Pointwise variability of worse eyes was larger than that of better eyes, especially between 10 to 15 dB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the case of a difference in MD greater than the 95% prediction intervals when compared with the previous visual field result, we should pay much attention to the possibility of progression of the glaucomatous visual field in patients with stable glaucoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"849-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Prcis:对稳定期青光眼患者的AIZE快速测试变异性分析表明,在早中期患者中,作为判断病情发展的潜在指标,MD值的95%预测区间为±1.63至±1.78 dB.Purpose:To explore the 95% prediction interval of the mean deviation (MD) value using the AIZE Rapid test strategy for glaucoma observation.Method:这项研究包括72名稳定或疑似青光眼患者,他们在两年内接受了三次或三次以上的imo AIZE快速测试。每位患者的双眼都被分为较好或较差的双眼。根据基线 MD 值将他们分为以下四组:MD > -3 dB,-6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB,-12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB,MD ≤ -12 dB。对观测期间 MD 的变异性和 95% 预测区间进行了分析。此外,还计算了各测试点的极限点变异性:纳入研究的较好和较差眼数分别为 46 和 33。中位随访时间为 1.3 年(范围:0.5 至 1.9 年)。视力较好的眼睛(n = 46)MD 值的 95% 预测区间为 ±1.41 dB,视力较差的眼睛(n = 33)MD 值的 95% 预测区间为 ±1.47 dB。MD>-3分贝组、-6分贝本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Variability of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Rapid Tests on the "imo" Perimeter in Patients With Stable Glaucoma.
Prcis: Analysis of Ambient Interactive Zippy Estimation of Sequential Testing (AIZE) Rapid test variability in patients with stable glaucoma showed that the 95% prediction interval of the mean deviation (MD) value, potentially an index for judging progression, was ±1.63 to ±1.78 dB in early-to-moderate-stage patients.
Objective: To explore the 95% prediction interval of the MD value using the AIZE Rapid test strategy for glaucoma observation.
Patients and methods: This study included 72 patients with stable or suspected glaucoma who underwent the imo AIZE Rapid test 3 times or more within 2 years. Both eyes from each patient were classified as better or worse eyes. They were divided based on baseline MD values into the following 4 groups: MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB. The variability of MD during the observation period and the 95% prediction intervals were analyzed. Pointwise variability of limits at each test location was also calculated.
Results: The numbers of better and worse eyes included in the study were 46 and 33. The median follow-up period was 1.3 years (range: 0.5 to 1.9 y). The 95% prediction intervals for MD values were ±1.41 dB for better eyes (n = 46) and ±1.47 dB for worse eyes (n = 33). The 95% prediction intervals in the MD > -3 dB, -6 dB < MD ≤ -3 dB, -12 dB < MD ≤ -6 dB, and MD ≤ -12 dB groups were ±1.63 dB, ±1.34 dB, ±1.78 dB, and ±1.33 dB, respectively. Pointwise variability of worse eyes was larger than that of better eyes, especially between 10 to 15 dB.
Conclusion: In the case of a difference in MD greater than the 95% prediction intervals when compared with the previous visual field result, we should pay much attention to the possibility of progression of the glaucomatous visual field in patients with stable glaucoma.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.