Ramya Thota, Patricia A Hurley, Therica M Miller, Suanna S Bruinooge, Craig Lipset, R Donald Harvey, Lora J Black, Amanda Dinsdale, Janette K Merrill, Teri Pollastro, Sheila A Prindiville, Mujahid A Rizvi, Shimere Sherwood, Grzegorz S Nowakowski
{"title":"提高以患者为中心的分散临床试验的可及性需要简化监管要求:ASCO 研究声明。","authors":"Ramya Thota, Patricia A Hurley, Therica M Miller, Suanna S Bruinooge, Craig Lipset, R Donald Harvey, Lora J Black, Amanda Dinsdale, Janette K Merrill, Teri Pollastro, Sheila A Prindiville, Mujahid A Rizvi, Shimere Sherwood, Grzegorz S Nowakowski","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Strategies to bring clinical trials closer to patients gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling more participants to receive treatment and/or testing in their local communities. Incorporation of decentralized trial elements presents both opportunities and challenges, spanning regulatory, technical, and operational aspects. This ASCO research statement includes timely consensus-driven recommendations and a call for engagement of all research stakeholders. ASCO held multistakeholder meetings with leaders in oncology research and concluded that research-related regulatory and administrative requirements and burdens present critical barriers to decentralizing trials. One example is sponsor and contract research organization (CRO) use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Statement of Investigator (Form 1572), which was found to exceed FDA's stated intent and used in conservative ways disproportionate to potential risks to participants and scientific integrity. As a result, research sites experience an avalanche of downstream administrative and regulatory activities that consume considerable resources. This statement recommends four key solutions to address such barriers and recalibrate regulatory and administrative expectations for decentralizing trials: (1) FDA should engage the research community in a public-private partnership to modernize standards and enable local access to trials; (2) sponsors and CROs should develop standards and protocols that accommodate flexible approaches, enable local participation, provide clarity around roles and requirements, and promote consistency; (3) research centers, networks, and sites should update policies and procedures to implement decentralized trial elements; and (4) research community should develop a streamlined, uniform mechanism to simplify regulatory data collection and documentation and use it consistently across trials. We can and must prioritize a concerted commitment to simplify and streamline regulatory requirements and practices to broaden access to and participation in cancer clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":42,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.\",\"authors\":\"Ramya Thota, Patricia A Hurley, Therica M Miller, Suanna S Bruinooge, Craig Lipset, R Donald Harvey, Lora J Black, Amanda Dinsdale, Janette K Merrill, Teri Pollastro, Sheila A Prindiville, Mujahid A Rizvi, Shimere Sherwood, Grzegorz S Nowakowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.24.00961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Strategies to bring clinical trials closer to patients gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling more participants to receive treatment and/or testing in their local communities. Incorporation of decentralized trial elements presents both opportunities and challenges, spanning regulatory, technical, and operational aspects. This ASCO research statement includes timely consensus-driven recommendations and a call for engagement of all research stakeholders. ASCO held multistakeholder meetings with leaders in oncology research and concluded that research-related regulatory and administrative requirements and burdens present critical barriers to decentralizing trials. One example is sponsor and contract research organization (CRO) use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Statement of Investigator (Form 1572), which was found to exceed FDA's stated intent and used in conservative ways disproportionate to potential risks to participants and scientific integrity. As a result, research sites experience an avalanche of downstream administrative and regulatory activities that consume considerable resources. This statement recommends four key solutions to address such barriers and recalibrate regulatory and administrative expectations for decentralizing trials: (1) FDA should engage the research community in a public-private partnership to modernize standards and enable local access to trials; (2) sponsors and CROs should develop standards and protocols that accommodate flexible approaches, enable local participation, provide clarity around roles and requirements, and promote consistency; (3) research centers, networks, and sites should update policies and procedures to implement decentralized trial elements; and (4) research community should develop a streamlined, uniform mechanism to simplify regulatory data collection and documentation and use it consistently across trials. We can and must prioritize a concerted commitment to simplify and streamline regulatory requirements and practices to broaden access to and participation in cancer clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00961\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,让临床试验更贴近患者的策略获得了发展,使更多参与者能够在当地社区接受治疗和/或检测。纳入分散试验要素既是机遇也是挑战,涉及监管、技术和操作等多个方面。这份 ASCO 研究声明包括了及时的共识驱动建议,并呼吁所有研究利益相关者参与其中。ASCO 与肿瘤研究领域的领导者召开了多方利益相关者会议,并得出结论:与研究相关的监管和行政要求及负担是分散化试验的关键障碍。其中一个例子是赞助商和合同研究组织 (CRO) 使用美国食品药品管理局 (FDA) 的《研究者声明》(1572 表),该声明被认为超出了 FDA 的既定意图,而且使用方式保守,与参与者和科学完整性面临的潜在风险不相称。因此,研究机构经历了大量消耗大量资源的下游行政和监管活动。本声明建议了四个关键解决方案来解决这些障碍,并重新调整分散试验的监管和行政预期:(1) FDA 应与研究界建立公私合作关系,使标准现代化,并使当地能够参与试验;(2) 申办者和 CRO 应制定标准和协议,以适应灵活的方法,使当地能够参与,明确职责和要求,并促进一致性;(3) 研究中心、网络和研究机构应更新政策和程序,以实施分散的试验要素;(4) 研究界应制定精简、统一的机制,以简化监管数据的收集和记录,并在各项试验中统一使用。我们可以而且必须优先考虑协调一致地致力于简化和精简监管要求和做法,以扩大癌症临床试验的可及性和参与度。
Improving Access to Patient-Focused, Decentralized Clinical Trials Requires Streamlined Regulatory Requirements: An ASCO Research Statement.
Strategies to bring clinical trials closer to patients gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling more participants to receive treatment and/or testing in their local communities. Incorporation of decentralized trial elements presents both opportunities and challenges, spanning regulatory, technical, and operational aspects. This ASCO research statement includes timely consensus-driven recommendations and a call for engagement of all research stakeholders. ASCO held multistakeholder meetings with leaders in oncology research and concluded that research-related regulatory and administrative requirements and burdens present critical barriers to decentralizing trials. One example is sponsor and contract research organization (CRO) use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Statement of Investigator (Form 1572), which was found to exceed FDA's stated intent and used in conservative ways disproportionate to potential risks to participants and scientific integrity. As a result, research sites experience an avalanche of downstream administrative and regulatory activities that consume considerable resources. This statement recommends four key solutions to address such barriers and recalibrate regulatory and administrative expectations for decentralizing trials: (1) FDA should engage the research community in a public-private partnership to modernize standards and enable local access to trials; (2) sponsors and CROs should develop standards and protocols that accommodate flexible approaches, enable local participation, provide clarity around roles and requirements, and promote consistency; (3) research centers, networks, and sites should update policies and procedures to implement decentralized trial elements; and (4) research community should develop a streamlined, uniform mechanism to simplify regulatory data collection and documentation and use it consistently across trials. We can and must prioritize a concerted commitment to simplify and streamline regulatory requirements and practices to broaden access to and participation in cancer clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data is a monthly journal devoted to the publication of data obtained from both experiment and computation, which are viewed as complementary. It is the only American Chemical Society journal primarily concerned with articles containing data on the phase behavior and the physical, thermodynamic, and transport properties of well-defined materials, including complex mixtures of known compositions. While environmental and biological samples are of interest, their compositions must be known and reproducible. As a result, adsorption on natural product materials does not generally fit within the scope of Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.