Maxwell Mikelic, Alexander Jusdanis, Zachary Bergson, Joseph S. DeLuca, Cansu Sarac, Matthew F. Dobbs, Sophia Shuster, Shreya Vaidya, Katarzyna Wyka, Lawrence H. Yang, Yulia Landa, Cheryl M. Corcoran, Shaynna N. Herrera
{"title":"一项试点研究，调查针对精神病临床高危人群的 BEGIN 心理教育干预对情绪和污名化相关体验的影响。","authors":"Maxwell Mikelic, Alexander Jusdanis, Zachary Bergson, Joseph S. DeLuca, Cansu Sarac, Matthew F. Dobbs, Sophia Shuster, Shreya Vaidya, Katarzyna Wyka, Lawrence H. Yang, Yulia Landa, Cheryl M. Corcoran, Shaynna N. Herrera","doi":"10.1111/eip.13602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>There is concern that the provision of the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) label is stigmatizing. Prior research suggests people have nuanced reactions to feedback involving the CHR label, including a positive experience receiving feedback and improvement in negative emotions (e.g., shame), while also exhibiting concerns about self-perception and perceptions from others related to the label. The current pilot study aimed to evaluate whether individuals at CHR showed changes in emotional and stigma-related experiences following a CHR psychoeducation intervention, BEGIN: Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants at CHR (<i>N</i> = 26) identified via the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes completed the Mental Health Attitudes Interview measuring symptom-related and CHR label-related stigma at pre- and post-intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Stigma did not increase and participants had greater positive emotions (e.g., feeling hopeful and relieved), post-BEGIN.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests that standardized CHR psychoeducation does not increase stigma in individuals at CHR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"18 12","pages":"1055-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study investigating the effect of the BEGIN psychoeducation intervention for people at clinical high risk for psychosis on emotional and stigma-related experiences\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Mikelic, Alexander Jusdanis, Zachary Bergson, Joseph S. DeLuca, Cansu Sarac, Matthew F. Dobbs, Sophia Shuster, Shreya Vaidya, Katarzyna Wyka, Lawrence H. Yang, Yulia Landa, Cheryl M. Corcoran, Shaynna N. Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.13602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is concern that the provision of the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) label is stigmatizing. Prior research suggests people have nuanced reactions to feedback involving the CHR label, including a positive experience receiving feedback and improvement in negative emotions (e.g., shame), while also exhibiting concerns about self-perception and perceptions from others related to the label. The current pilot study aimed to evaluate whether individuals at CHR showed changes in emotional and stigma-related experiences following a CHR psychoeducation intervention, BEGIN: Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants at CHR (<i>N</i> = 26) identified via the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes completed the Mental Health Attitudes Interview measuring symptom-related and CHR label-related stigma at pre- and post-intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stigma did not increase and participants had greater positive emotions (e.g., feeling hopeful and relieved), post-BEGIN.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study suggests that standardized CHR psychoeducation does not increase stigma in individuals at CHR.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"18 12\",\"pages\":\"1055-1061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.13602\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.13602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A pilot study investigating the effect of the BEGIN psychoeducation intervention for people at clinical high risk for psychosis on emotional and stigma-related experiences
Aim
There is concern that the provision of the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) label is stigmatizing. Prior research suggests people have nuanced reactions to feedback involving the CHR label, including a positive experience receiving feedback and improvement in negative emotions (e.g., shame), while also exhibiting concerns about self-perception and perceptions from others related to the label. The current pilot study aimed to evaluate whether individuals at CHR showed changes in emotional and stigma-related experiences following a CHR psychoeducation intervention, BEGIN: Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need.
Method
Participants at CHR (N = 26) identified via the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes completed the Mental Health Attitudes Interview measuring symptom-related and CHR label-related stigma at pre- and post-intervention.
Results
Stigma did not increase and participants had greater positive emotions (e.g., feeling hopeful and relieved), post-BEGIN.
Conclusion
This study suggests that standardized CHR psychoeducation does not increase stigma in individuals at CHR.
期刊介绍：
Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
