{"title":"滑稽、戏仿、魅力:翻译哈尼巴尔-卢西奇的《维拉","authors":"Wendy Bracewell","doi":"10.3366/tal.2024.0584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Jur nijedna na svit vila’, by Hanibal Lucić ( c.1485–1553), is one of the best known and most loved poems of the Croatian Renaissance, but translating it into a different context poses problems of reception. The article uses travesty and parody to address the issues of poetic vocabulary and gender regime, and finds similarities between such techniques and translation. Each of these can prompt a critical interpretation of the poem. But the resulting critical gaze does not necessarily lead to an adequate reading, and the article goes on to discuss aspects that are obscured in translation, from echoes of oral literature to the grammar of traditional love-charms, suggesting that the point of the poem is to convey an emotional effect, that of enchantment or wonder, that is not accessible through critique. But does such magic, which demands exact repetition, work in translation?","PeriodicalId":42399,"journal":{"name":"Translation and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Travesty, Parody, Enchantment: Translating Hanibal Lucić's Vila\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Bracewell\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/tal.2024.0584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘Jur nijedna na svit vila’, by Hanibal Lucić ( c.1485–1553), is one of the best known and most loved poems of the Croatian Renaissance, but translating it into a different context poses problems of reception. The article uses travesty and parody to address the issues of poetic vocabulary and gender regime, and finds similarities between such techniques and translation. Each of these can prompt a critical interpretation of the poem. But the resulting critical gaze does not necessarily lead to an adequate reading, and the article goes on to discuss aspects that are obscured in translation, from echoes of oral literature to the grammar of traditional love-charms, suggesting that the point of the poem is to convey an emotional effect, that of enchantment or wonder, that is not accessible through critique. But does such magic, which demands exact repetition, work in translation?\",\"PeriodicalId\":42399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translation and Literature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translation and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/tal.2024.0584\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translation and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/tal.2024.0584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Hanibal Lucić(约 1485-1553 年)的《Jur nijedna na svit vila》是克罗地亚文艺复兴时期最著名、最受喜爱的诗歌之一,但将其翻译成不同的语境却带来了接受上的问题。文章利用滑稽剧和戏仿来解决诗歌词汇和性别制度的问题,并发现这些技巧与翻译之间的相似之处。每一种手法都能引发对诗歌的批判性解读。文章接着讨论了翻译中被掩盖的方面,从口头文学的回声到传统爱情符咒的语法,认为诗歌的重点在于传达一种情感效果,即魔力或惊奇,而这种效果是无法通过批判获得的。但是,这种需要准确重复的魔力在翻译中能起作用吗?
Travesty, Parody, Enchantment: Translating Hanibal Lucić's Vila
‘Jur nijedna na svit vila’, by Hanibal Lucić ( c.1485–1553), is one of the best known and most loved poems of the Croatian Renaissance, but translating it into a different context poses problems of reception. The article uses travesty and parody to address the issues of poetic vocabulary and gender regime, and finds similarities between such techniques and translation. Each of these can prompt a critical interpretation of the poem. But the resulting critical gaze does not necessarily lead to an adequate reading, and the article goes on to discuss aspects that are obscured in translation, from echoes of oral literature to the grammar of traditional love-charms, suggesting that the point of the poem is to convey an emotional effect, that of enchantment or wonder, that is not accessible through critique. But does such magic, which demands exact repetition, work in translation?
期刊介绍:
Translation and Literature is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal focusing on English Literature in its foreign relations. Subjects of recent articles have included English translations of Martial, Spenser''s use of Ovid, Eighteenth-Century Satire and Roman dialogue, Basil Bunting''s translations, Finnigans Wake in Italian, and the translation of haiku. Contributors come from many disciplines: * English Literature * Modern Languages * Literary Theory * Classical Studies * Translation Studies Translation and Literature is indexed in the Arts and Humanities bibliographies and bibliographical databases including the Modern Language Association of America International Bibliography.