模拟医疗补助扩展对北卡罗来纳州阿片类药物流行的影响

Anthony Berghammer, Joella W. Adams, Sazid Khan, Georgiy Bobashev
{"title":"模拟医疗补助扩展对北卡罗来纳州阿片类药物流行的影响","authors":"Anthony Berghammer,&nbsp;Joella W. Adams,&nbsp;Sazid Khan,&nbsp;Georgiy Bobashev","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Expanding Medicaid plays a large role in ensuring that people across the United States have access to health care services. Although North Carolina recently moved toward Medicaid expansion, the impact of expansion on overdoses and overdose mortality may vary based on the type of treatment (offering medications for opioid use disorder [MOUD] vs. offering inpatient medically managed withdrawal without linkage to further MOUD treatment or non–MOUD-based treatment) accessed by individuals newly eligible for treatment through expansion. Based on official North Carolina statistics and published peer-reviewed literature, we developed a simulation model that forecasts opioid overdose and mortality under different scenarios for type of treatment accessed (MOUD-based vs. non–MOUD-based) and Medicaid coverage levels. An optimistic scenario assuming 70 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment during the first year of expansion estimated that 332 (Simulation Interval: 246–412) overdose deaths would be averted. A scenario more in line with recent historical trends assuming 38 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment resulted in 213 (Simulation Interval: 157–263) averted overdose deaths. In all scenarios, MOUD-based treatment approaches increased the number of lives saved compared with approaches expanding opioid treatment through non–MOUD-based treatment. Our study emphasized the need to ensure access to MOUD-based treatment for individuals newly covered by the Medicaid expansion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000465/pdfft?md5=aa309dbf2154369a42edff042e47fc11&pid=1-s2.0-S2772724624000465-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating the effects of medicaid expansion on the opioid epidemic in North Carolina\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Berghammer,&nbsp;Joella W. Adams,&nbsp;Sazid Khan,&nbsp;Georgiy Bobashev\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Expanding Medicaid plays a large role in ensuring that people across the United States have access to health care services. Although North Carolina recently moved toward Medicaid expansion, the impact of expansion on overdoses and overdose mortality may vary based on the type of treatment (offering medications for opioid use disorder [MOUD] vs. offering inpatient medically managed withdrawal without linkage to further MOUD treatment or non–MOUD-based treatment) accessed by individuals newly eligible for treatment through expansion. Based on official North Carolina statistics and published peer-reviewed literature, we developed a simulation model that forecasts opioid overdose and mortality under different scenarios for type of treatment accessed (MOUD-based vs. non–MOUD-based) and Medicaid coverage levels. An optimistic scenario assuming 70 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment during the first year of expansion estimated that 332 (Simulation Interval: 246–412) overdose deaths would be averted. A scenario more in line with recent historical trends assuming 38 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment resulted in 213 (Simulation Interval: 157–263) averted overdose deaths. In all scenarios, MOUD-based treatment approaches increased the number of lives saved compared with approaches expanding opioid treatment through non–MOUD-based treatment. Our study emphasized the need to ensure access to MOUD-based treatment for individuals newly covered by the Medicaid expansion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence reports\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000465/pdfft?md5=aa309dbf2154369a42edff042e47fc11&pid=1-s2.0-S2772724624000465-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩大医疗补助计划(Medicaid)在确保全美人民获得医疗保健服务方面发挥着重要作用。虽然北卡罗来纳州最近开始扩大医疗补助计划,但扩大计划对过量用药和过量用药死亡率的影响可能会因通过扩大计划新获得治疗资格的个人所接受的治疗类型(提供阿片类药物使用障碍 [MOUD] 药物治疗与提供住院医疗管理戒断治疗,但不提供进一步的 MOUD 治疗或非 MOUD 治疗)而有所不同。根据北卡罗来纳州的官方统计数据和已发表的同行评审文献,我们开发了一个模拟模型,预测在接受治疗类型(基于 MOUD 的治疗与非基于 MOUD 的治疗)和医疗补助覆盖水平不同的情况下阿片类药物过量和死亡率。在乐观的情况下,假设有 70% 的新符合治疗条件的人将在扩大医保范围的第一年接受治疗,估计可避免 332 例(模拟区间:246-412)用药过量死亡。一种更符合近期历史趋势的方案假设 38% 新符合治疗条件的人会接受治疗,结果是避免了 213 例吸毒过量死亡(模拟区间:157-263)。在所有情况下,与通过非基于 MOUD 的治疗扩大阿片类药物治疗相比,基于 MOUD 的治疗方法增加了挽救生命的人数。我们的研究强调,有必要确保医疗补助扩大后新覆盖的人群能够获得基于 MOUD 的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulating the effects of medicaid expansion on the opioid epidemic in North Carolina

Expanding Medicaid plays a large role in ensuring that people across the United States have access to health care services. Although North Carolina recently moved toward Medicaid expansion, the impact of expansion on overdoses and overdose mortality may vary based on the type of treatment (offering medications for opioid use disorder [MOUD] vs. offering inpatient medically managed withdrawal without linkage to further MOUD treatment or non–MOUD-based treatment) accessed by individuals newly eligible for treatment through expansion. Based on official North Carolina statistics and published peer-reviewed literature, we developed a simulation model that forecasts opioid overdose and mortality under different scenarios for type of treatment accessed (MOUD-based vs. non–MOUD-based) and Medicaid coverage levels. An optimistic scenario assuming 70 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment during the first year of expansion estimated that 332 (Simulation Interval: 246–412) overdose deaths would be averted. A scenario more in line with recent historical trends assuming 38 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment resulted in 213 (Simulation Interval: 157–263) averted overdose deaths. In all scenarios, MOUD-based treatment approaches increased the number of lives saved compared with approaches expanding opioid treatment through non–MOUD-based treatment. Our study emphasized the need to ensure access to MOUD-based treatment for individuals newly covered by the Medicaid expansion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信