同性异性男性亲密伴侣关系中情感的关系性别维度

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
John L. Oliffe , Nina Gao , Mary T. Kelly , Alex Broom , Damien Ridge , Zac E. Seidler , Paul Sharp , Simon M. Rice
{"title":"同性异性男性亲密伴侣关系中情感的关系性别维度","authors":"John L. Oliffe ,&nbsp;Nina Gao ,&nbsp;Mary T. Kelly ,&nbsp;Alex Broom ,&nbsp;Damien Ridge ,&nbsp;Zac E. Seidler ,&nbsp;Paul Sharp ,&nbsp;Simon M. Rice","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Illuminating relational gendered dimensions of emotions in heterosexual cisgender men’s intimate partnerships, this study addresses a significant knowledge gap in masculinities, emotionality and health work. Thematic analyses of individual photovoice interviews with 92 men from diverse locales and ethnocultural backgrounds revealed a trilogy of men’s practices regarding emotions. <em>Emotional restraint</em> was embodied by men withholding rather than freely expressing emotions, wherein participants justified diverse practices as the by-product of not understanding women partners’ emotionality and working to balance emotions in the relationship. In <em>coached emotions</em> men spoke about needing to unlearn suppressing their emotions while relying on women partners’ expertise for becoming more emotionally expressive and available. This included work around reading and accommodating their partner’s emotions. <em>Emotionally orientated</em> men positioned themselves as relationship ready, whereby they were equally or more emotional than their partners. This emotionality was claimed as an asset and strength integral to building contemporary intimate partner relationships. The findings highlight most men as operating across the three themes, revealing how wide-ranging socially constructed emotions are influenced by gender relations and a plurality of masculinities. Also afforded by these results are directions for working with heterosexual cisgender men to advance gender equity in heterosexual intimate partner relationships.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152400074X/pdfft?md5=44898481ade59abc06d7738c66769871&pid=1-s2.0-S266732152400074X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relational gendered dimensions of emotions in heterosexual cisgender Men’s intimate partnerships\",\"authors\":\"John L. Oliffe ,&nbsp;Nina Gao ,&nbsp;Mary T. Kelly ,&nbsp;Alex Broom ,&nbsp;Damien Ridge ,&nbsp;Zac E. Seidler ,&nbsp;Paul Sharp ,&nbsp;Simon M. Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Illuminating relational gendered dimensions of emotions in heterosexual cisgender men’s intimate partnerships, this study addresses a significant knowledge gap in masculinities, emotionality and health work. Thematic analyses of individual photovoice interviews with 92 men from diverse locales and ethnocultural backgrounds revealed a trilogy of men’s practices regarding emotions. <em>Emotional restraint</em> was embodied by men withholding rather than freely expressing emotions, wherein participants justified diverse practices as the by-product of not understanding women partners’ emotionality and working to balance emotions in the relationship. In <em>coached emotions</em> men spoke about needing to unlearn suppressing their emotions while relying on women partners’ expertise for becoming more emotionally expressive and available. This included work around reading and accommodating their partner’s emotions. <em>Emotionally orientated</em> men positioned themselves as relationship ready, whereby they were equally or more emotional than their partners. This emotionality was claimed as an asset and strength integral to building contemporary intimate partner relationships. The findings highlight most men as operating across the three themes, revealing how wide-ranging socially constructed emotions are influenced by gender relations and a plurality of masculinities. Also afforded by these results are directions for working with heterosexual cisgender men to advance gender equity in heterosexual intimate partner relationships.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152400074X/pdfft?md5=44898481ade59abc06d7738c66769871&pid=1-s2.0-S266732152400074X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152400074X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152400074X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究阐明了异性恋顺性别男性亲密伴侣关系中情感的性别层面,填补了男性、情感和健康工作方面的重大知识空白。对来自不同地区和种族文化背景的 92 名男性进行的个人摄影选择访谈进行了主题分析,揭示了男性在情感方面的三部曲。情感克制体现在男性克制自己的情感,而不是自由地表达情感。参与者将不同的做法解释为不理解女性伴侣的情感和在关系中努力平衡情感的副产品。在情感辅导中,男性谈到他们需要学会不再压抑自己的情感,同时依靠女性伴侣的专业知识来变得更善于表达情感和更容易获得情感。这包括解读和适应伴侣的情绪。以情感为导向的男性将自己定位为关系准备就绪的人,他们与伴侣同样情感丰富,甚至比伴侣更加情感丰富。这种情绪化被认为是建立当代亲密伴侣关系不可或缺的资产和力量。研究结果凸显了大多数男性在这三个主题上的表现,揭示了社会建构的情感是如何受到性别关系和男性多元性的影响的。这些结果也为与异性恋双性恋男性合作,促进异性亲密伴侣关系中的性别平等指明了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relational gendered dimensions of emotions in heterosexual cisgender Men’s intimate partnerships

Illuminating relational gendered dimensions of emotions in heterosexual cisgender men’s intimate partnerships, this study addresses a significant knowledge gap in masculinities, emotionality and health work. Thematic analyses of individual photovoice interviews with 92 men from diverse locales and ethnocultural backgrounds revealed a trilogy of men’s practices regarding emotions. Emotional restraint was embodied by men withholding rather than freely expressing emotions, wherein participants justified diverse practices as the by-product of not understanding women partners’ emotionality and working to balance emotions in the relationship. In coached emotions men spoke about needing to unlearn suppressing their emotions while relying on women partners’ expertise for becoming more emotionally expressive and available. This included work around reading and accommodating their partner’s emotions. Emotionally orientated men positioned themselves as relationship ready, whereby they were equally or more emotional than their partners. This emotionality was claimed as an asset and strength integral to building contemporary intimate partner relationships. The findings highlight most men as operating across the three themes, revealing how wide-ranging socially constructed emotions are influenced by gender relations and a plurality of masculinities. Also afforded by these results are directions for working with heterosexual cisgender men to advance gender equity in heterosexual intimate partner relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信