绘制澳大利亚可用水量图,作为土壤生产资本指标

Nicolas Francos, Alex B. McBratney, Damien J. Field, Budiman Minasny
{"title":"绘制澳大利亚可用水量图,作为土壤生产资本指标","authors":"Nicolas Francos,&nbsp;Alex B. McBratney,&nbsp;Damien J. Field,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to identify a key soil property influencing farmland prices as a soil production capital indicator for soil security. There is generally a strong relationship between farmland price and production capital, as well as with biomass production. From a soil-centric point of view, under dryland agriculture in Australia, we hypothesise that soil available water capacity (AWC) is a key soil property influencing farmland prices and consequently can act as a soil production capital indicator. Here, we relate soil AWC of Australia to median farmland prices using digital soil maps of AWC. The results revealed that AWC from 0 to 100 cm is significantly associated with farmland prices (<em>r</em> = 0.31, <em>p</em>-value&lt;0.05), providing a linear regression to estimate the soil production capital. As long as the AWC (mm) is above 67.6, the coefficient suggests that a 1 mm increase in AWC (mm) results in an increment of 293.6 $/ha in farmland prices in Australia. Additionally, an assessment of the anthropological impact on soils was conducted through phenosoil-genosoil differentiation analysis. We concluded that despite the shared formation characteristics of each pedogenon, soils with the highest AWC were not necessarily chosen for agricultural purposes since European settlement. Furthermore, our findings indicate that phenosoils in Queensland and Tasmania have higher levels of insecurity, likely due to intensified and inappropriate farming that may result in AWC reductions. This analysis provides another perspective to quantify the capital dimension of soil security, valuing its critical role in sustainable food systems and ecosystem services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000315/pdfft?md5=74a7f3dedf6b8e9d59cdcc95d9f7e8de&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000315-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping available water capacity as a soil production capital metric in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Francos,&nbsp;Alex B. McBratney,&nbsp;Damien J. Field,&nbsp;Budiman Minasny\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aims to identify a key soil property influencing farmland prices as a soil production capital indicator for soil security. There is generally a strong relationship between farmland price and production capital, as well as with biomass production. From a soil-centric point of view, under dryland agriculture in Australia, we hypothesise that soil available water capacity (AWC) is a key soil property influencing farmland prices and consequently can act as a soil production capital indicator. Here, we relate soil AWC of Australia to median farmland prices using digital soil maps of AWC. The results revealed that AWC from 0 to 100 cm is significantly associated with farmland prices (<em>r</em> = 0.31, <em>p</em>-value&lt;0.05), providing a linear regression to estimate the soil production capital. As long as the AWC (mm) is above 67.6, the coefficient suggests that a 1 mm increase in AWC (mm) results in an increment of 293.6 $/ha in farmland prices in Australia. Additionally, an assessment of the anthropological impact on soils was conducted through phenosoil-genosoil differentiation analysis. We concluded that despite the shared formation characteristics of each pedogenon, soils with the highest AWC were not necessarily chosen for agricultural purposes since European settlement. Furthermore, our findings indicate that phenosoils in Queensland and Tasmania have higher levels of insecurity, likely due to intensified and inappropriate farming that may result in AWC reductions. This analysis provides another perspective to quantify the capital dimension of soil security, valuing its critical role in sustainable food systems and ecosystem services.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil security\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000315/pdfft?md5=74a7f3dedf6b8e9d59cdcc95d9f7e8de&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000315-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定影响农田价格的关键土壤属性,作为土壤安全的土壤生产资本指标。一般来说,农田价格与生产资本以及生物量生产之间存在密切关系。从以土壤为中心的角度来看,在澳大利亚的旱地农业中,我们假设土壤可用水量(AWC)是影响农田价格的关键土壤属性,因此可以作为土壤生产资本指标。在此,我们利用 AWC 数字土壤地图将澳大利亚的土壤 AWC 与农田价格中位数联系起来。结果表明,0 至 100 厘米的 AWC 与农田价格显著相关(r = 0.31,p-value<0.05),为估算土壤生产资本提供了线性回归。只要 AWC(毫米)高于 67.6,该系数就表明,AWC(毫米)每增加 1 毫米,澳大利亚的农田价格就会增加 293.6 美元/公顷。此外,我们还通过表土-原土分异分析评估了人类活动对土壤的影响。我们得出的结论是,尽管每种成土因子都具有共同的形成特征,但自欧洲人定居以来,人们并不一定会选择AWC最高的土壤作为农业用途。此外,我们的研究结果表明,昆士兰州和塔斯马尼亚州的表土具有较高的不安全性,这可能是由于强化和不适当的耕作造成了 AWC 的降低。这项分析从另一个角度量化了土壤安全的资本维度,评估了其在可持续粮食系统和生态系统服务中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping available water capacity as a soil production capital metric in Australia

This study aims to identify a key soil property influencing farmland prices as a soil production capital indicator for soil security. There is generally a strong relationship between farmland price and production capital, as well as with biomass production. From a soil-centric point of view, under dryland agriculture in Australia, we hypothesise that soil available water capacity (AWC) is a key soil property influencing farmland prices and consequently can act as a soil production capital indicator. Here, we relate soil AWC of Australia to median farmland prices using digital soil maps of AWC. The results revealed that AWC from 0 to 100 cm is significantly associated with farmland prices (r = 0.31, p-value<0.05), providing a linear regression to estimate the soil production capital. As long as the AWC (mm) is above 67.6, the coefficient suggests that a 1 mm increase in AWC (mm) results in an increment of 293.6 $/ha in farmland prices in Australia. Additionally, an assessment of the anthropological impact on soils was conducted through phenosoil-genosoil differentiation analysis. We concluded that despite the shared formation characteristics of each pedogenon, soils with the highest AWC were not necessarily chosen for agricultural purposes since European settlement. Furthermore, our findings indicate that phenosoils in Queensland and Tasmania have higher levels of insecurity, likely due to intensified and inappropriate farming that may result in AWC reductions. This analysis provides another perspective to quantify the capital dimension of soil security, valuing its critical role in sustainable food systems and ecosystem services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信