Sunjin Ahn , Qing Luo , Shelby Mendoza , F. Bailey Norwood
{"title":"反思传统的美国草坪:全国性调查中美国家庭的观点","authors":"Sunjin Ahn , Qing Luo , Shelby Mendoza , F. Bailey Norwood","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As households are increasingly aware that traditional lawns of a grass monoculture have environmental and biodiversity drawbacks, a movement has formed to advocate for alternative lawns. An example is the No Mow May movement, where households do not mow their lawns in May and allow dicots to grow and flower. The purpose of this study is to assess the willingness of U.S. households to join the No Mow May movement, and the extent to which they desire an alternative to the traditional lawn. A total of 908 U.S. households who actively maintain a lawn completed an online survey in May of 2023. When presented with information about the No Mow May movement, 56 % indicated they would participate if some of their neighbors did also. A variety of traditional and alternative lawn illustrations were then provided, where subjects were asked to rate the desirability of each. Most respondents preferred the traditional lawn, even if they looked upon alternatives favorably, while 15–20 percent favored an alternative lawn. These results suggest conventional lawns are still the preferred lawn, but alternatives lawns may become increasingly popular over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 128460"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the traditional American lawn: Perspectives of U.S. households in a nationwide survey\",\"authors\":\"Sunjin Ahn , Qing Luo , Shelby Mendoza , F. Bailey Norwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As households are increasingly aware that traditional lawns of a grass monoculture have environmental and biodiversity drawbacks, a movement has formed to advocate for alternative lawns. An example is the No Mow May movement, where households do not mow their lawns in May and allow dicots to grow and flower. The purpose of this study is to assess the willingness of U.S. households to join the No Mow May movement, and the extent to which they desire an alternative to the traditional lawn. A total of 908 U.S. households who actively maintain a lawn completed an online survey in May of 2023. When presented with information about the No Mow May movement, 56 % indicated they would participate if some of their neighbors did also. A variety of traditional and alternative lawn illustrations were then provided, where subjects were asked to rate the desirability of each. Most respondents preferred the traditional lawn, even if they looked upon alternatives favorably, while 15–20 percent favored an alternative lawn. These results suggest conventional lawns are still the preferred lawn, but alternatives lawns may become increasingly popular over time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rethinking the traditional American lawn: Perspectives of U.S. households in a nationwide survey
As households are increasingly aware that traditional lawns of a grass monoculture have environmental and biodiversity drawbacks, a movement has formed to advocate for alternative lawns. An example is the No Mow May movement, where households do not mow their lawns in May and allow dicots to grow and flower. The purpose of this study is to assess the willingness of U.S. households to join the No Mow May movement, and the extent to which they desire an alternative to the traditional lawn. A total of 908 U.S. households who actively maintain a lawn completed an online survey in May of 2023. When presented with information about the No Mow May movement, 56 % indicated they would participate if some of their neighbors did also. A variety of traditional and alternative lawn illustrations were then provided, where subjects were asked to rate the desirability of each. Most respondents preferred the traditional lawn, even if they looked upon alternatives favorably, while 15–20 percent favored an alternative lawn. These results suggest conventional lawns are still the preferred lawn, but alternatives lawns may become increasingly popular over time.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.