Yiyue Sun , Yi Zuo , Yanjun Shao , Lihua Wang , Lu-Man Jiang , Jiaming Hu , Chuanting Zhou , Xi Lu , Song Huang , Zhen Zhou
{"title":"结合污泥原位减量的废水处理工艺的碳足迹分析","authors":"Yiyue Sun , Yi Zuo , Yanjun Shao , Lihua Wang , Lu-Man Jiang , Jiaming Hu , Chuanting Zhou , Xi Lu , Song Huang , Zhen Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this study was to assess the impacts or benefits of sludge in situ reduction (SIR) within wastewater treatment processes with relation to global warming potential in wastewater treatment plants, with a comprehensive consideration of wastewater and sludge treatment. The anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) and the sludge process reduction activated sludge (SPRAS), two typical SIR technologies, were used to compare the carbon footprint analysis results with the conventional anaerobic - anoxic - oxic (AAO) process. Compared to the AAO, the ASSR with a typical sludge reduction efficiency (SRE) of 30 % increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.1 - 1.7 %, while the SPRAS with a SRE of 74 % reduced GHG emissions by 12.3 - 17.6 %. Electricity consumption (0.025 - 0.027 kg CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>), CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (0.016 - 0.059 kg CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>), and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (0.009 - 0.023 kg CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>) for the removal of secondary substrates released from sludge decay in the SIR processes were the major contributor to the increased GHG emissions from the wastewater treatment system. By lowering sludge production and the organic matter content in the sludge, the SIR processes significantly decreased the carbon footprints associated with sludge treatment and disposal. The threshold SREs of the ASSR for GHG reduction were 27.7 % and 34.6 % for the advanced dewatering - sanitary landfill and conventional dewatering - drying-incinerating routes, respectively. Overall, the SPRAS process could be considered as a cost-effective and sustainable low-carbon SIR technology for wastewater treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52198,"journal":{"name":"Water Research X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000331/pdfft?md5=2de9b0c83b367b3abb143647d9212f29&pid=1-s2.0-S2589914724000331-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment processes coupled with sludge in situ reduction\",\"authors\":\"Yiyue Sun , Yi Zuo , Yanjun Shao , Lihua Wang , Lu-Man Jiang , Jiaming Hu , Chuanting Zhou , Xi Lu , Song Huang , Zhen Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The goal of this study was to assess the impacts or benefits of sludge in situ reduction (SIR) within wastewater treatment processes with relation to global warming potential in wastewater treatment plants, with a comprehensive consideration of wastewater and sludge treatment. The anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) and the sludge process reduction activated sludge (SPRAS), two typical SIR technologies, were used to compare the carbon footprint analysis results with the conventional anaerobic - anoxic - oxic (AAO) process. Compared to the AAO, the ASSR with a typical sludge reduction efficiency (SRE) of 30 % increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.1 - 1.7 %, while the SPRAS with a SRE of 74 % reduced GHG emissions by 12.3 - 17.6 %. Electricity consumption (0.025 - 0.027 kg CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>), CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (0.016 - 0.059 kg CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>), and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (0.009 - 0.023 kg CO<sub>2-eq</sub>/m<sup>3</sup>) for the removal of secondary substrates released from sludge decay in the SIR processes were the major contributor to the increased GHG emissions from the wastewater treatment system. By lowering sludge production and the organic matter content in the sludge, the SIR processes significantly decreased the carbon footprints associated with sludge treatment and disposal. The threshold SREs of the ASSR for GHG reduction were 27.7 % and 34.6 % for the advanced dewatering - sanitary landfill and conventional dewatering - drying-incinerating routes, respectively. Overall, the SPRAS process could be considered as a cost-effective and sustainable low-carbon SIR technology for wastewater treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000331/pdfft?md5=2de9b0c83b367b3abb143647d9212f29&pid=1-s2.0-S2589914724000331-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000331\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research X","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589914724000331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估污泥原位减量(SIR)在废水处理工艺中对废水处理厂全球变暖潜能值的影响或益处,并对废水和污泥处理进行综合考虑。厌氧侧流反应器(ASSR)和污泥工艺减量活性污泥(SPRAS)是两种典型的 SIR 技术,碳足迹分析结果与传统的厌氧-缺氧-缺氧(AAO)工艺进行了比较。与 AAO 相比,典型污泥减量效率(SRE)为 30% 的 ASSR 增加了 1.1 - 1.7% 的温室气体(GHG)排放量,而 SRE 为 74% 的 SPRAS 则减少了 12.3 - 17.6% 的温室气体排放量。SIR 工艺中去除污泥腐烂释放的二次基质所消耗的电力(0.025 - 0.027 kg CO2-eq/m3)、二氧化碳排放量(0.016 - 0.059 kg CO2-eq/m3)和一氧化二氮排放量(0.009 - 0.023 kg CO2-eq/m3)是污水处理系统温室气体排放量增加的主要原因。通过降低污泥产量和污泥中的有机物含量,SIR 工艺显著减少了与污泥处理和处置相关的碳足迹。对于高级脱水-卫生填埋和传统脱水-干燥-焚烧路线,ASSR 的温室气体减排阈值 SRE 分别为 27.7% 和 34.6%。总体而言,SPRAS 工艺可被视为一种成本效益高且可持续的低碳 SIR 废水处理技术。
Carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment processes coupled with sludge in situ reduction
The goal of this study was to assess the impacts or benefits of sludge in situ reduction (SIR) within wastewater treatment processes with relation to global warming potential in wastewater treatment plants, with a comprehensive consideration of wastewater and sludge treatment. The anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) and the sludge process reduction activated sludge (SPRAS), two typical SIR technologies, were used to compare the carbon footprint analysis results with the conventional anaerobic - anoxic - oxic (AAO) process. Compared to the AAO, the ASSR with a typical sludge reduction efficiency (SRE) of 30 % increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.1 - 1.7 %, while the SPRAS with a SRE of 74 % reduced GHG emissions by 12.3 - 17.6 %. Electricity consumption (0.025 - 0.027 kg CO2-eq/m3), CO2 emissions (0.016 - 0.059 kg CO2-eq/m3), and N2O emissions (0.009 - 0.023 kg CO2-eq/m3) for the removal of secondary substrates released from sludge decay in the SIR processes were the major contributor to the increased GHG emissions from the wastewater treatment system. By lowering sludge production and the organic matter content in the sludge, the SIR processes significantly decreased the carbon footprints associated with sludge treatment and disposal. The threshold SREs of the ASSR for GHG reduction were 27.7 % and 34.6 % for the advanced dewatering - sanitary landfill and conventional dewatering - drying-incinerating routes, respectively. Overall, the SPRAS process could be considered as a cost-effective and sustainable low-carbon SIR technology for wastewater treatment.
Water Research XEnvironmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍:
Water Research X is a sister journal of Water Research, which follows a Gold Open Access model. It focuses on publishing concise, letter-style research papers, visionary perspectives and editorials, as well as mini-reviews on emerging topics. The Journal invites contributions from researchers worldwide on various aspects of the science and technology related to the human impact on the water cycle, water quality, and its global management.