添加或不添加柑橘浆的温带鲜草在肉牛体内的消化、氮排泄和瘤胃微生物群落以及体外甲烷输出量

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M. McGee , A. O’Connor , P. Cormican , P. O’Kiely , A.P. Moloney
{"title":"添加或不添加柑橘浆的温带鲜草在肉牛体内的消化、氮排泄和瘤胃微生物群落以及体外甲烷输出量","authors":"M. McGee ,&nbsp;A. O’Connor ,&nbsp;P. Cormican ,&nbsp;P. O’Kiely ,&nbsp;A.P. Moloney","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of supplementing grass with a high-energy, low-protein concentrate on intake, rumen fermentation, rumen microbial communities, apparent total tract digestibility and N-balance in beef cattle, and rumen fermentation and methane output <em>in vitro,</em> were studied. Sixteen Charolais steers (mean live weight (s.d.) 564 (24.3) kg)), were used in a completely randomised block design experiment, and offered either zero-grazed perennial ryegrass (<em>Lolium perenne L.</em>) <em>ad libitum</em> (GO), or the same grass with 2.25 kg citrus pulp dry matter (DM) daily (GCP). During the measurement phase, DM intake was restricted at 0.85 of their pre-determined intake. The same diets were incubated in an eight-vessel RUSITEC system. Supplementation decreased grass DM intake (6.59 vs. 7.54 kg/d) but increased total DM intake by 0.95 kg/d (P &lt; 0.01). Rumen pH (P = 0.05) and NH<sub>3</sub> concentration (P &lt; 0.05) decreased, and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (P &lt; 0.01), molar proportions of propionate (P = 0.08) and butyrate (P &lt; 0.05) increased for GCP compared to GO. Supplementation significantly altered the overall rumen microbial community structure compared to GO, driven principally by changes in relative abundance of <em>Prevotella</em>, <em>Methoanobrevibacter</em> and <em>Lachnospiraceae</em> genera. Plasma urea concentration was lower (P &lt; 0.05) for GCP than GO. There was no effect (P &gt; 0.10) of supplementation on apparent total tract digestibility of DM, OM and ADFom, but aNDFom digestibility tended to be lower (P = 0.07) and crude protein (N × 6.25) digestibility was lower (P &lt; 0.01) for GCP compared to GO. Nitrogen intake (200 g/d) did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) between treatments. Faeces N loss was 9 g/d greater (P &lt; 0.01), and urine (P &lt; 0.01) and total (P &lt; 0.05) N losses were 22 and 13 g/d lower, respectively, for GCP compared to GO. In terms of N-balance (g/kg N intake), faecal N excretion was greater and urinary N excretion was lower (P &lt; 0.01) resulting in a greater N use efficiency (P = 0.06) for GCP than GO. <em>In vitro</em> rumen NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations were lower (P &lt; 0.01) for GCP compared to GO, whereas <em>in vitro</em> rumen pH, lactic acid, VFA concentrations and molar proportions, and methane and total gas output did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) between treatments. Supplementing grass with a low-protein, high-energy feed may be a strategy to reduce urinary and total N excretion in beef cattle grazing temperate grass pasture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"316 ","pages":"Article 116059"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digestion, nitrogen excretion and rumen microbial communities in beef cattle, and in vitro methane output, of fresh temperate grass with or without citrus pulp supplementation\",\"authors\":\"M. McGee ,&nbsp;A. O’Connor ,&nbsp;P. Cormican ,&nbsp;P. O’Kiely ,&nbsp;A.P. Moloney\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effects of supplementing grass with a high-energy, low-protein concentrate on intake, rumen fermentation, rumen microbial communities, apparent total tract digestibility and N-balance in beef cattle, and rumen fermentation and methane output <em>in vitro,</em> were studied. Sixteen Charolais steers (mean live weight (s.d.) 564 (24.3) kg)), were used in a completely randomised block design experiment, and offered either zero-grazed perennial ryegrass (<em>Lolium perenne L.</em>) <em>ad libitum</em> (GO), or the same grass with 2.25 kg citrus pulp dry matter (DM) daily (GCP). During the measurement phase, DM intake was restricted at 0.85 of their pre-determined intake. The same diets were incubated in an eight-vessel RUSITEC system. Supplementation decreased grass DM intake (6.59 vs. 7.54 kg/d) but increased total DM intake by 0.95 kg/d (P &lt; 0.01). Rumen pH (P = 0.05) and NH<sub>3</sub> concentration (P &lt; 0.05) decreased, and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (P &lt; 0.01), molar proportions of propionate (P = 0.08) and butyrate (P &lt; 0.05) increased for GCP compared to GO. Supplementation significantly altered the overall rumen microbial community structure compared to GO, driven principally by changes in relative abundance of <em>Prevotella</em>, <em>Methoanobrevibacter</em> and <em>Lachnospiraceae</em> genera. Plasma urea concentration was lower (P &lt; 0.05) for GCP than GO. There was no effect (P &gt; 0.10) of supplementation on apparent total tract digestibility of DM, OM and ADFom, but aNDFom digestibility tended to be lower (P = 0.07) and crude protein (N × 6.25) digestibility was lower (P &lt; 0.01) for GCP compared to GO. Nitrogen intake (200 g/d) did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) between treatments. Faeces N loss was 9 g/d greater (P &lt; 0.01), and urine (P &lt; 0.01) and total (P &lt; 0.05) N losses were 22 and 13 g/d lower, respectively, for GCP compared to GO. In terms of N-balance (g/kg N intake), faecal N excretion was greater and urinary N excretion was lower (P &lt; 0.01) resulting in a greater N use efficiency (P = 0.06) for GCP than GO. <em>In vitro</em> rumen NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations were lower (P &lt; 0.01) for GCP compared to GO, whereas <em>in vitro</em> rumen pH, lactic acid, VFA concentrations and molar proportions, and methane and total gas output did not differ (P &gt; 0.05) between treatments. Supplementing grass with a low-protein, high-energy feed may be a strategy to reduce urinary and total N excretion in beef cattle grazing temperate grass pasture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"316 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001871\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了用高能量、低蛋白精料补充青草对肉牛采食量、瘤胃发酵、瘤胃微生物群落、表观总消化率和氮平衡以及体外瘤胃发酵和甲烷输出的影响。在完全随机区组设计实验中使用了 16 头夏洛莱牛(平均活重为 564 (24.3) kg),每天自由采食零草率的多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne L.)(GO),或采食同样的草料并添加 2.25 kg 的柑橘果肉干物质(DM)(GCP)。在测量阶段,DM摄入量限制在预定摄入量的0.85。同样的日粮在八孔 RUSITEC 系统中进行培养。补饲减少了草DM摄入量(6.59 vs. 7.54 kg/d),但总DM摄入量增加了0.95 kg/d(P < 0.01)。与 GO 相比,GCP 的瘤胃 pH 值(P = 0.05)和 NH3 浓度(P < 0.05)降低,总挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)浓度(P < 0.01)、丙酸盐摩尔比例(P = 0.08)和丁酸盐摩尔比例(P < 0.05)增加。与普通瘤胃相比,补饲明显改变了瘤胃微生物群落的整体结构,主要是由于普雷沃特氏菌属、Methoanobrevibacter 和 Lachnospiraceae 属的相对丰度发生了变化。GCP 的血浆尿素浓度低于 GO(P < 0.05)。与 GO 相比,补充 GCP 对 DM、OM 和 ADFom 的表观总消化率没有影响(P > 0.10),但 aNDFom 消化率往往较低(P = 0.07),粗蛋白(N × 6.25)消化率较低(P < 0.01)。不同处理之间的氮摄入量(200 克/天)没有差异(P > 0.05)。与 GO 相比,GCP 的粪便氮损失高出 9 克/天(P < 0.01),尿液氮损失(P < 0.01)和总氮损失(P < 0.05)分别低 22 克/天和 13 克/天。就氮平衡(克/千克氮摄入量)而言,粪氮排泄量更大,而尿氮排泄量更小(P < 0.01),因此 GCP 的氮利用效率(P = 0.06)高于 GO。与GO相比,GCP的体外瘤胃NH3浓度较低(P <0.01),而体外瘤胃pH值、乳酸、VFA浓度和摩尔比例以及甲烷和总气体输出量在不同处理之间没有差异(P >0.05)。用低蛋白、高能量饲料补充草料可能是减少温带草牧场肉牛尿氮和总氮排泄的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digestion, nitrogen excretion and rumen microbial communities in beef cattle, and in vitro methane output, of fresh temperate grass with or without citrus pulp supplementation

The effects of supplementing grass with a high-energy, low-protein concentrate on intake, rumen fermentation, rumen microbial communities, apparent total tract digestibility and N-balance in beef cattle, and rumen fermentation and methane output in vitro, were studied. Sixteen Charolais steers (mean live weight (s.d.) 564 (24.3) kg)), were used in a completely randomised block design experiment, and offered either zero-grazed perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) ad libitum (GO), or the same grass with 2.25 kg citrus pulp dry matter (DM) daily (GCP). During the measurement phase, DM intake was restricted at 0.85 of their pre-determined intake. The same diets were incubated in an eight-vessel RUSITEC system. Supplementation decreased grass DM intake (6.59 vs. 7.54 kg/d) but increased total DM intake by 0.95 kg/d (P < 0.01). Rumen pH (P = 0.05) and NH3 concentration (P < 0.05) decreased, and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations (P < 0.01), molar proportions of propionate (P = 0.08) and butyrate (P < 0.05) increased for GCP compared to GO. Supplementation significantly altered the overall rumen microbial community structure compared to GO, driven principally by changes in relative abundance of Prevotella, Methoanobrevibacter and Lachnospiraceae genera. Plasma urea concentration was lower (P < 0.05) for GCP than GO. There was no effect (P > 0.10) of supplementation on apparent total tract digestibility of DM, OM and ADFom, but aNDFom digestibility tended to be lower (P = 0.07) and crude protein (N × 6.25) digestibility was lower (P < 0.01) for GCP compared to GO. Nitrogen intake (200 g/d) did not differ (P > 0.05) between treatments. Faeces N loss was 9 g/d greater (P < 0.01), and urine (P < 0.01) and total (P < 0.05) N losses were 22 and 13 g/d lower, respectively, for GCP compared to GO. In terms of N-balance (g/kg N intake), faecal N excretion was greater and urinary N excretion was lower (P < 0.01) resulting in a greater N use efficiency (P = 0.06) for GCP than GO. In vitro rumen NH3 concentrations were lower (P < 0.01) for GCP compared to GO, whereas in vitro rumen pH, lactic acid, VFA concentrations and molar proportions, and methane and total gas output did not differ (P > 0.05) between treatments. Supplementing grass with a low-protein, high-energy feed may be a strategy to reduce urinary and total N excretion in beef cattle grazing temperate grass pasture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信