手握强度与 CONUT 的组合可预测胃肠癌患者的总生存期:一项多中心队列研究

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
{"title":"手握强度与 CONUT 的组合可预测胃肠癌患者的总生存期:一项多中心队列研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.07.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The controlled nutritional status score (CONUT) and handgrip strength (HGS) were both predictive indexes for the prognosis of cancers. However, the combination of CONUT and HGS for predicting the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer had not been developed. This study aimed to explore the combination of CONUT and HGS as the potential predictive prognosis in patients with gastric and colorectal cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cohort study was conducted with gastric and colorectal cancer patients in multicenter in China. Based on the optimal HGS cutoff value for different sex, the HGS cutoff value was determined. The patients were divided into high and low HGS groups based on their HGS scores. A CONUT score of 4 or less was defined as a low CONUT, whereas scores higher than 4 were defined as high CONUT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare time-event relationships between groups. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total 2177 gastric and colorectal patients were enrolled in this study, in which 1391 (63.9%) were men (mean [SD] age, 66.11 [11.60] years). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with high HGS had a lower risk of death than those with low HGS (hazard ratio [HR],0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.753–1.006, <em>P</em> = 0.06), while high CONUT had a higher risk of death than those with low CONUT (HR, 1.476; 95% CI, 1.227–1.777, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Patients with both low HGS and high CONUT had 1.712 fold increased risk of death (HR, 1.712; 95% CI, 1.364–2.15, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, cancer type and sex were stratified and found that patients with high CONUT and low HGS had lower survival rate than those with low CONUT and high HGS in both gastric or colorectal cancer, and both male and female.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A combination of low HGS and high CONUT was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, which could probably predict the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer more accurate than HGS or CONUT alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combination of handgrip strength and CONUT predicts overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A multicenter cohort study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.07.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The controlled nutritional status score (CONUT) and handgrip strength (HGS) were both predictive indexes for the prognosis of cancers. However, the combination of CONUT and HGS for predicting the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer had not been developed. This study aimed to explore the combination of CONUT and HGS as the potential predictive prognosis in patients with gastric and colorectal cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cohort study was conducted with gastric and colorectal cancer patients in multicenter in China. Based on the optimal HGS cutoff value for different sex, the HGS cutoff value was determined. The patients were divided into high and low HGS groups based on their HGS scores. A CONUT score of 4 or less was defined as a low CONUT, whereas scores higher than 4 were defined as high CONUT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare time-event relationships between groups. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total 2177 gastric and colorectal patients were enrolled in this study, in which 1391 (63.9%) were men (mean [SD] age, 66.11 [11.60] years). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with high HGS had a lower risk of death than those with low HGS (hazard ratio [HR],0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.753–1.006, <em>P</em> = 0.06), while high CONUT had a higher risk of death than those with low CONUT (HR, 1.476; 95% CI, 1.227–1.777, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Patients with both low HGS and high CONUT had 1.712 fold increased risk of death (HR, 1.712; 95% CI, 1.364–2.15, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Moreover, cancer type and sex were stratified and found that patients with high CONUT and low HGS had lower survival rate than those with low CONUT and high HGS in both gastric or colorectal cancer, and both male and female.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A combination of low HGS and high CONUT was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, which could probably predict the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer more accurate than HGS or CONUT alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424002553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424002553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对照营养状况评分(CONUT)和手握力(HGS)都是预测癌症预后的指标。然而,将营养状况评分(CONUT)和手握力(HGS)结合起来预测胃肠道癌症预后的方法尚未开发出来。本研究旨在探索胃癌和结直肠癌患者的潜在预后预测指标--CONUT和HGS的联合应用。方法在中国多中心对胃癌和结直肠癌患者进行队列研究。根据不同性别的最佳 HGS 临界值,确定了 HGS 临界值。根据 HGS 评分将患者分为高 HGS 组和低 HGS 组。CONUT得分在4分或以下被定义为低CONUT,而高于4分被定义为高CONUT。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法绘制生存曲线,并用 log-rank 检验比较各组之间的时间事件关系。结果 本研究共纳入 2177 例胃癌和结直肠癌患者,其中 1391 例(63.9%)为男性(平均 [SD] 年龄,66.11 [11.60] 岁)。多变量分析显示,高 HGS 患者的死亡风险低于低 HGS 患者(危险比 [HR],0.87;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.753-1.006,P = 0.06),而高 CONUT 患者的死亡风险高于低 CONUT 患者(HR,1.476;95% CI,1.227-1.777,P <0.001)。同时具有低 HGS 和高 CONUT 的患者的死亡风险增加了 1.712 倍(HR,1.712;95% CI,1.364-2.15,P <;0.001)。此外,对癌症类型和性别进行分层后发现,无论是胃癌还是结直肠癌,无论是男性还是女性,高CONUT和低HGS患者的生存率均低于低CONUT和高HGS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The combination of handgrip strength and CONUT predicts overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A multicenter cohort study

Background

The controlled nutritional status score (CONUT) and handgrip strength (HGS) were both predictive indexes for the prognosis of cancers. However, the combination of CONUT and HGS for predicting the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer had not been developed. This study aimed to explore the combination of CONUT and HGS as the potential predictive prognosis in patients with gastric and colorectal cancer.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted with gastric and colorectal cancer patients in multicenter in China. Based on the optimal HGS cutoff value for different sex, the HGS cutoff value was determined. The patients were divided into high and low HGS groups based on their HGS scores. A CONUT score of 4 or less was defined as a low CONUT, whereas scores higher than 4 were defined as high CONUT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare time-event relationships between groups. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for overall survival (OS).

Results

A total 2177 gastric and colorectal patients were enrolled in this study, in which 1391 (63.9%) were men (mean [SD] age, 66.11 [11.60] years). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with high HGS had a lower risk of death than those with low HGS (hazard ratio [HR],0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.753–1.006, P = 0.06), while high CONUT had a higher risk of death than those with low CONUT (HR, 1.476; 95% CI, 1.227–1.777, P < 0.001). Patients with both low HGS and high CONUT had 1.712 fold increased risk of death (HR, 1.712; 95% CI, 1.364–2.15, P < 0.001). Moreover, cancer type and sex were stratified and found that patients with high CONUT and low HGS had lower survival rate than those with low CONUT and high HGS in both gastric or colorectal cancer, and both male and female.

Conclusion

A combination of low HGS and high CONUT was associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, which could probably predict the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer more accurate than HGS or CONUT alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信