Ye CHEN , Xiao-qin TANG , Jian-hua CHEN , Meng LIU
{"title":"Cerussite (PbCO3) 和 smithsonite (ZnCO3) 硫化机理的 DFT 研究","authors":"Ye CHEN , Xiao-qin TANG , Jian-hua CHEN , Meng LIU","doi":"10.1016/S1003-6326(24)66544-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The differences in the sulfidization mechanism of cerussite (PbCO<sub>3</sub>) and smithsonite (ZnCO<sub>3</sub>) were comparatively studied by the density functional theory (DFT) method. Pb−S/Zn−S layers over PbCO<sub>3</sub>/ZnCO<sub>3</sub> surfaces are constructed to simulate the sulfidization structure. The results of layer distance and Mulliken charge suggest that Pb−S layer formed over PbCO<sub>3</sub> is stable but Zn−S layer formed over ZnCO<sub>3</sub> is unstable. Because of the high covalency of Pb−S layer and the high ionicity of Zn−S layer, the sulfidization−xanthate method is effective for cerussite but ineffective for smithsonite flotation. To recover smithsonite, strong ionicity collectors are required, and hence the sulfidization−amine method is applied more to smithsonite flotation. These differences in the sulfide layer structure and flotation behavior of PbCO<sub>3</sub> and ZnCO<sub>3</sub> surfaces are mainly attributed to the different polarizabilities of the metal ions (Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup>) and the ligands (O ligand and S ligand) and the inertness of Zn<sup>2+</sup> 3d<sup>10</sup> orbital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23191,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China","volume":"34 7","pages":"Pages 2328-2341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003632624665441/pdf?md5=c85e8ef3747ccd0f77534db8482445fa&pid=1-s2.0-S1003632624665441-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DFT study of sulfidization mechanism of cerussite (PbCO3) and smithsonite (ZnCO3)\",\"authors\":\"Ye CHEN , Xiao-qin TANG , Jian-hua CHEN , Meng LIU\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1003-6326(24)66544-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The differences in the sulfidization mechanism of cerussite (PbCO<sub>3</sub>) and smithsonite (ZnCO<sub>3</sub>) were comparatively studied by the density functional theory (DFT) method. Pb−S/Zn−S layers over PbCO<sub>3</sub>/ZnCO<sub>3</sub> surfaces are constructed to simulate the sulfidization structure. The results of layer distance and Mulliken charge suggest that Pb−S layer formed over PbCO<sub>3</sub> is stable but Zn−S layer formed over ZnCO<sub>3</sub> is unstable. Because of the high covalency of Pb−S layer and the high ionicity of Zn−S layer, the sulfidization−xanthate method is effective for cerussite but ineffective for smithsonite flotation. To recover smithsonite, strong ionicity collectors are required, and hence the sulfidization−amine method is applied more to smithsonite flotation. These differences in the sulfide layer structure and flotation behavior of PbCO<sub>3</sub> and ZnCO<sub>3</sub> surfaces are mainly attributed to the different polarizabilities of the metal ions (Pb<sup>2+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup>) and the ligands (O ligand and S ligand) and the inertness of Zn<sup>2+</sup> 3d<sup>10</sup> orbital.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China\",\"volume\":\"34 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2328-2341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003632624665441/pdf?md5=c85e8ef3747ccd0f77534db8482445fa&pid=1-s2.0-S1003632624665441-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003632624665441\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003632624665441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
DFT study of sulfidization mechanism of cerussite (PbCO3) and smithsonite (ZnCO3)
The differences in the sulfidization mechanism of cerussite (PbCO3) and smithsonite (ZnCO3) were comparatively studied by the density functional theory (DFT) method. Pb−S/Zn−S layers over PbCO3/ZnCO3 surfaces are constructed to simulate the sulfidization structure. The results of layer distance and Mulliken charge suggest that Pb−S layer formed over PbCO3 is stable but Zn−S layer formed over ZnCO3 is unstable. Because of the high covalency of Pb−S layer and the high ionicity of Zn−S layer, the sulfidization−xanthate method is effective for cerussite but ineffective for smithsonite flotation. To recover smithsonite, strong ionicity collectors are required, and hence the sulfidization−amine method is applied more to smithsonite flotation. These differences in the sulfide layer structure and flotation behavior of PbCO3 and ZnCO3 surfaces are mainly attributed to the different polarizabilities of the metal ions (Pb2+ and Zn2+) and the ligands (O ligand and S ligand) and the inertness of Zn2+ 3d10 orbital.
期刊介绍:
The Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China), founded in 1991 and sponsored by The Nonferrous Metals Society of China, is published monthly now and mainly contains reports of original research which reflect the new progresses in the field of nonferrous metals science and technology, including mineral processing, extraction metallurgy, metallic materials and heat treatments, metal working, physical metallurgy, powder metallurgy, with the emphasis on fundamental science. It is the unique preeminent publication in English for scientists, engineers, under/post-graduates on the field of nonferrous metals industry. This journal is covered by many famous abstract/index systems and databases such as SCI Expanded, Ei Compendex Plus, INSPEC, CA, METADEX, AJ and JICST.