经导管电外科主动脉隔膜切除术优化了慢性夹层的远端着床区

IF 1.7 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexander P. Nissen MD , Yazan M. Duwayri MD , William D. Jordan MD , Vasilis C. Babaliaros MD , Robert J. Lederman MD , Bradley G. Leshnower MD
{"title":"经导管电外科主动脉隔膜切除术优化了慢性夹层的远端着床区","authors":"Alexander P. Nissen MD ,&nbsp;Yazan M. Duwayri MD ,&nbsp;William D. Jordan MD ,&nbsp;Vasilis C. Babaliaros MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Lederman MD ,&nbsp;Bradley G. Leshnower MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD) is dependent on eliminating retrograde false lumen perfusion and remodeling the aorta. We describe the efficacy of a novel transcatheter electrosurgical technique to fenestrate the dissection flap and create a distal seal zone for TEVAR in CTBAD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of the Emory Aortic Database from 2016 to 2023 identified 33 patients who underwent TEVAR with intentional endovascular rupture of the dissection flap (Knickerbocker; KNICK) for CTBAD. In 11 patients, we performed transcatheter electrosurgical aortic septostomy (TECSAS) before KNICK. The technical aspects of TECSAS + KNICK are described and results compared with TEVAR + KNICK alone.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dissection chronicity, aortic size, and preoperative demographics were similar between groups. Technical success was 100%, with zero stroke or paraplegia in both groups. Thirty-day mortality for TECSAS versus KNICK was 0% versus 13.6% (<em>P</em> = .199). Median follow-up was shorter after TECSAS versus KNICK, although not statistically significant (14.6 months vs 21.9 months; <em>P</em> = .065). Elimination of retrograde false lumen perfusion (TECSAS 100% vs KNICK 68.2%; <em>P</em> = .035) and complete false lumen thrombosis or obliteration (TECSAS 91.9% vs KNICK 54.6%; <em>P</em> = .037) were more frequent after the TECSAS procedure. Aortic reinterventions were less frequent after TECSAS versus KNICK (0% vs 13.6%, <em>P</em> = .199), although not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of TECSAS to intentional endovascular rupture of the dissection flap in CTBAD improves distal seal, eliminating retrograde false lumen perfusion. This technique is a safe and precise method to fenestrate a dissection flap and optimize TEVAR in CTBAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 19-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter electrosurgical aortic septostomy optimizes distal landing zone in chronic dissection\",\"authors\":\"Alexander P. Nissen MD ,&nbsp;Yazan M. Duwayri MD ,&nbsp;William D. Jordan MD ,&nbsp;Vasilis C. Babaliaros MD ,&nbsp;Robert J. Lederman MD ,&nbsp;Bradley G. Leshnower MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD) is dependent on eliminating retrograde false lumen perfusion and remodeling the aorta. We describe the efficacy of a novel transcatheter electrosurgical technique to fenestrate the dissection flap and create a distal seal zone for TEVAR in CTBAD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of the Emory Aortic Database from 2016 to 2023 identified 33 patients who underwent TEVAR with intentional endovascular rupture of the dissection flap (Knickerbocker; KNICK) for CTBAD. In 11 patients, we performed transcatheter electrosurgical aortic septostomy (TECSAS) before KNICK. The technical aspects of TECSAS + KNICK are described and results compared with TEVAR + KNICK alone.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dissection chronicity, aortic size, and preoperative demographics were similar between groups. Technical success was 100%, with zero stroke or paraplegia in both groups. Thirty-day mortality for TECSAS versus KNICK was 0% versus 13.6% (<em>P</em> = .199). Median follow-up was shorter after TECSAS versus KNICK, although not statistically significant (14.6 months vs 21.9 months; <em>P</em> = .065). Elimination of retrograde false lumen perfusion (TECSAS 100% vs KNICK 68.2%; <em>P</em> = .035) and complete false lumen thrombosis or obliteration (TECSAS 91.9% vs KNICK 54.6%; <em>P</em> = .037) were more frequent after the TECSAS procedure. Aortic reinterventions were less frequent after TECSAS versus KNICK (0% vs 13.6%, <em>P</em> = .199), although not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of TECSAS to intentional endovascular rupture of the dissection flap in CTBAD improves distal seal, eliminating retrograde false lumen perfusion. This technique is a safe and precise method to fenestrate a dissection flap and optimize TEVAR in CTBAD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS Techniques\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250724002803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250724002803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的慢性B型主动脉夹层(CTBAD)胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)的疗效取决于消除逆行假腔灌注和重塑主动脉。我们描述了一种新型经导管电外科技术的疗效,该技术可在 CTBAD 中剥离夹层瓣并创建 TEVAR 的远端密封区。方法回顾性审查了 2016 年至 2023 年的埃默里主动脉数据库,确定了 33 例因 CTBAD 而接受 TEVAR 并有意血管内破裂夹层瓣(Knickerbocker;KNICK)的患者。在 11 例患者中,我们在 KNICK 之前进行了经导管电切主动脉间隔成形术(TECSAS)。我们对 TECSAS + KNICK 的技术方面进行了描述,并将结果与单独的 TEVAR + KNICK 进行了比较。技术成功率为 100%,两组均无中风或截瘫。TECSAS与KNICK的30天死亡率分别为0%和13.6%(P = .199)。TECSAS 与 KNICK 相比,中位随访时间更短,但无统计学意义(14.6 个月 vs 21.9 个月;P = 0.065)。TECSAS术后更常出现逆行假腔灌注消除(TECSAS 100% vs KNICK 68.2%;P = .035)和完全假腔血栓形成或闭塞(TECSAS 91.9% vs KNICK 54.6%;P = .037)。TECSAS 与 KNICK 相比,主动脉再介入的发生率较低(0% vs 13.6%,P = .199),但无统计学意义。结论在 CTBAD 中有意进行血管内破裂夹层瓣时增加 TECSAS 可改善远端密封性,消除逆行假腔灌注。该技术是一种安全、精确的方法,可在 CTBAD 中使夹层瓣破裂并优化 TEVAR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcatheter electrosurgical aortic septostomy optimizes distal landing zone in chronic dissection

Objective

Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD) is dependent on eliminating retrograde false lumen perfusion and remodeling the aorta. We describe the efficacy of a novel transcatheter electrosurgical technique to fenestrate the dissection flap and create a distal seal zone for TEVAR in CTBAD.

Methods

A retrospective review of the Emory Aortic Database from 2016 to 2023 identified 33 patients who underwent TEVAR with intentional endovascular rupture of the dissection flap (Knickerbocker; KNICK) for CTBAD. In 11 patients, we performed transcatheter electrosurgical aortic septostomy (TECSAS) before KNICK. The technical aspects of TECSAS + KNICK are described and results compared with TEVAR + KNICK alone.

Results

Dissection chronicity, aortic size, and preoperative demographics were similar between groups. Technical success was 100%, with zero stroke or paraplegia in both groups. Thirty-day mortality for TECSAS versus KNICK was 0% versus 13.6% (P = .199). Median follow-up was shorter after TECSAS versus KNICK, although not statistically significant (14.6 months vs 21.9 months; P = .065). Elimination of retrograde false lumen perfusion (TECSAS 100% vs KNICK 68.2%; P = .035) and complete false lumen thrombosis or obliteration (TECSAS 91.9% vs KNICK 54.6%; P = .037) were more frequent after the TECSAS procedure. Aortic reinterventions were less frequent after TECSAS versus KNICK (0% vs 13.6%, P = .199), although not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The addition of TECSAS to intentional endovascular rupture of the dissection flap in CTBAD improves distal seal, eliminating retrograde false lumen perfusion. This technique is a safe and precise method to fenestrate a dissection flap and optimize TEVAR in CTBAD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信