北约常规力量编组体系的转变

P. Trunov
{"title":"北约常规力量编组体系的转变","authors":"P. Trunov","doi":"10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The deterrence by Western democracies of key opponents, first of all Russia, includes the rapid and scaled increase of NATO’s power. The basis of the Alliance’s potential consists of a modernized and strengthened system of military groupings. Methods and materials. In some scientific papers, there was a perception of NATO as more inertial than the EU. But the contemporary evolution of the Alliance is rather dynamic. The goal of the article is to explore the transformation of conventional NATO’s groupings using the theory of armed forces building. The author explores the conceptual level of NATO’s development, but key attention is paid to the practical one. Analysis and results. The elder system of NATO’s military groupings during the former Cold War had as the key element the 1st strategic echelon of troops with its, in fact, unadvanced multilateralism of forces. Since the 2000s, a new system of military groupings has been established. It consists of the Forward Presence Force as the vanguards of the more powerful NATO Response Force (NRF), which was the 2nd strategic echelon of troops. The article explores qualitative and quantitative changes in the military groupings in 2014–2023 in the context of confrontation with the Russian Federation, and the creation of the New NATO Force Model on the basis of NRF (since 2022). The system of NATO’s military groupings of the 21st century is organizationally an example of already advanced multilateralism. Conclusion. The evolution of NATO’s groupings has confirmed the role of the Alliance as an actor in the development of confrontations. The new system of military groupings, developed in 2014–2023, should be more powerful than the one during the former Cold War. The author stresses the regularity of the modernization of the conventional groupings of NATO.","PeriodicalId":515910,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","volume":"11 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Transformation of the System of NATO’s Conventional Forces Groupings\",\"authors\":\"P. Trunov\",\"doi\":\"10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The deterrence by Western democracies of key opponents, first of all Russia, includes the rapid and scaled increase of NATO’s power. The basis of the Alliance’s potential consists of a modernized and strengthened system of military groupings. Methods and materials. In some scientific papers, there was a perception of NATO as more inertial than the EU. But the contemporary evolution of the Alliance is rather dynamic. The goal of the article is to explore the transformation of conventional NATO’s groupings using the theory of armed forces building. The author explores the conceptual level of NATO’s development, but key attention is paid to the practical one. Analysis and results. The elder system of NATO’s military groupings during the former Cold War had as the key element the 1st strategic echelon of troops with its, in fact, unadvanced multilateralism of forces. Since the 2000s, a new system of military groupings has been established. It consists of the Forward Presence Force as the vanguards of the more powerful NATO Response Force (NRF), which was the 2nd strategic echelon of troops. The article explores qualitative and quantitative changes in the military groupings in 2014–2023 in the context of confrontation with the Russian Federation, and the creation of the New NATO Force Model on the basis of NRF (since 2022). The system of NATO’s military groupings of the 21st century is organizationally an example of already advanced multilateralism. Conclusion. The evolution of NATO’s groupings has confirmed the role of the Alliance as an actor in the development of confrontations. The new system of military groupings, developed in 2014–2023, should be more powerful than the one during the former Cold War. The author stresses the regularity of the modernization of the conventional groupings of NATO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija\",\"volume\":\"11 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.3.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。西方民主国家对主要对手(首先是俄罗斯)的威慑包括北约力量的快速和规模化增长。北约潜力的基础是现代化和强化的军事集团体系。方法和材料。在一些科学论文中,人们认为北约比欧盟更具惯性。但是,北约在当代的演变却是充满活力的。文章的目的是利用武装力量建设理论探讨北约常规集团的转变。作者探讨了北约发展的概念层面,但重点关注了实践层面。分析与结果。前冷战时期北约军事编组的旧体系以部队第一战略梯队为关键要素,其事实上是不先进的部队多边主义。自 2000 年代以来,北约建立了新的军事编组体系。它由前沿存在部队组成,作为更强大的北约反应部队(NRF)的先锋,后者是第二战略部队梯队。文章探讨了在与俄罗斯联邦对抗的背景下,2014-2023 年军事编组的质和量的变化,以及在 NRF 基础上创建的新北约部队模式(自 2022 年起)。21 世纪的北约军事集团体系在组织上是先进多边主义的典范。结论。北约军事集团的演变证实了北约在对抗发展中的作用。在 2014-2023 年期间发展起来的新军事集团体系应比前冷战时期的体系更加强大。作者强调了北约常规编队现代化的规律性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Transformation of the System of NATO’s Conventional Forces Groupings
Introduction. The deterrence by Western democracies of key opponents, first of all Russia, includes the rapid and scaled increase of NATO’s power. The basis of the Alliance’s potential consists of a modernized and strengthened system of military groupings. Methods and materials. In some scientific papers, there was a perception of NATO as more inertial than the EU. But the contemporary evolution of the Alliance is rather dynamic. The goal of the article is to explore the transformation of conventional NATO’s groupings using the theory of armed forces building. The author explores the conceptual level of NATO’s development, but key attention is paid to the practical one. Analysis and results. The elder system of NATO’s military groupings during the former Cold War had as the key element the 1st strategic echelon of troops with its, in fact, unadvanced multilateralism of forces. Since the 2000s, a new system of military groupings has been established. It consists of the Forward Presence Force as the vanguards of the more powerful NATO Response Force (NRF), which was the 2nd strategic echelon of troops. The article explores qualitative and quantitative changes in the military groupings in 2014–2023 in the context of confrontation with the Russian Federation, and the creation of the New NATO Force Model on the basis of NRF (since 2022). The system of NATO’s military groupings of the 21st century is organizationally an example of already advanced multilateralism. Conclusion. The evolution of NATO’s groupings has confirmed the role of the Alliance as an actor in the development of confrontations. The new system of military groupings, developed in 2014–2023, should be more powerful than the one during the former Cold War. The author stresses the regularity of the modernization of the conventional groupings of NATO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信