{"title":"捕食风险与花卉回报:传粉昆虫如何平衡这些冲突以及对植物适应性的影响","authors":"Sabrina S. Gavini, Carolina Quintero","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Foraging behavior of pollinators is shaped by, among other factors, the conflict between maximizing resource intake and minimizing predation risk; yet, empirical studies quantifying variation in both forces are rare, compared to those investigating each separately. Here, we discuss the importance of simultaneously assessing bottom-up and top-down forces in the study of plant-pollinator interactions, and propose a conceptual and testable graphical hypothesis for pollinator foraging behavior and plant fitness outcomes as a function of varying floral rewards and predation risk. In low predation risk scenarios, no noticeable changes in pollinator foraging behavior are expected, with reward levels affecting only the activity threshold. However, as predation risk increases we propose that there is a decrease in foraging behavior, with a steeper decline as plants are more rewarding and profitable. Lastly, in high predation risk scenarios, we expect foraging to approach zero, regardless of floral rewards. Thus, we propose that pollinator foraging behavior follows an inverse S-shape curve, with more pronounced changes in foraging activity at intermediate levels of predation risk, especially in high reward systems. We present empirical evidence that is consistent with this hypothesis. In terms of the consequences for plant fitness, we propose that specialized plant-pollinator systems should be more vulnerable to increased predation risk, with a steeper and faster decline in plant fitness, compared with generalist systems, in which pollinator redundancy can delay or buffer the effect of predators. Moreover, whereas we expect that specialist systems follows a similar inverse S-shape curve, in generalist systems we propose three different scenarios as a function not only of reward level but also compatibility, mating-system, and the interplay between growth form and floral display. The incorporation of trade-offs in pollinator behavior balancing the conflicting demands between feeding and predation risk has a promising future as a key feature enabling the development of more complex foraging models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34629,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Insect Science","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000210/pdfft?md5=603dba4f0404a08f21150e0071f078b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666515824000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predation risk and floral rewards: How pollinators balance these conflicts and the consequences on plant fitness\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina S. Gavini, Carolina Quintero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Foraging behavior of pollinators is shaped by, among other factors, the conflict between maximizing resource intake and minimizing predation risk; yet, empirical studies quantifying variation in both forces are rare, compared to those investigating each separately. Here, we discuss the importance of simultaneously assessing bottom-up and top-down forces in the study of plant-pollinator interactions, and propose a conceptual and testable graphical hypothesis for pollinator foraging behavior and plant fitness outcomes as a function of varying floral rewards and predation risk. In low predation risk scenarios, no noticeable changes in pollinator foraging behavior are expected, with reward levels affecting only the activity threshold. However, as predation risk increases we propose that there is a decrease in foraging behavior, with a steeper decline as plants are more rewarding and profitable. Lastly, in high predation risk scenarios, we expect foraging to approach zero, regardless of floral rewards. Thus, we propose that pollinator foraging behavior follows an inverse S-shape curve, with more pronounced changes in foraging activity at intermediate levels of predation risk, especially in high reward systems. We present empirical evidence that is consistent with this hypothesis. In terms of the consequences for plant fitness, we propose that specialized plant-pollinator systems should be more vulnerable to increased predation risk, with a steeper and faster decline in plant fitness, compared with generalist systems, in which pollinator redundancy can delay or buffer the effect of predators. Moreover, whereas we expect that specialist systems follows a similar inverse S-shape curve, in generalist systems we propose three different scenarios as a function not only of reward level but also compatibility, mating-system, and the interplay between growth form and floral display. The incorporation of trade-offs in pollinator behavior balancing the conflicting demands between feeding and predation risk has a promising future as a key feature enabling the development of more complex foraging models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Insect Science\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000210/pdfft?md5=603dba4f0404a08f21150e0071f078b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666515824000210-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Insect Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
授粉昆虫的觅食行为受资源摄取最大化和捕食风险最小化之间的冲突等因素的影响;然而,与分别研究这两种力量的研究相比,量化这两种力量变化的实证研究并不多见。在这里,我们讨论了在研究植物与传粉昆虫的相互作用时同时评估自下而上和自上而下两种力量的重要性,并提出了一个概念性的、可检验的图解假设,即传粉昆虫的觅食行为和植物的适应性结果是不同花卉奖励和捕食风险的函数。在捕食风险较低的情况下,预计授粉昆虫的觅食行为不会发生明显变化,奖励水平只会影响活动阈值。然而,随着捕食风险的增加,我们认为授粉昆虫的觅食行为会减少,而且随着植物的奖励和利润增加,减少的幅度会更大。最后,在捕食风险较高的情况下,我们预计无论花卉奖励如何,觅食行为都会趋近于零。因此,我们认为授粉昆虫的觅食行为遵循一条反 S 型曲线,在捕食风险处于中间水平时,觅食活动会发生更明显的变化,尤其是在高回报系统中。我们提出的经验证据与这一假设相符。就对植物适应性的影响而言,我们认为,与通性系统相比,专性植物授粉系统更容易受到捕食风险增加的影响,植物适应性下降的幅度更大、速度更快,因为在通性系统中,授粉者的冗余可以延迟或缓冲捕食者的影响。此外,我们预计专性系统会遵循类似的反 S 型曲线,而在通性系统中,我们提出了三种不同的情况,这不仅是奖励水平的函数,也是兼容性、交配系统以及生长形式和花卉展示之间相互作用的函数。在授粉昆虫行为中加入权衡因素,平衡取食与捕食风险之间的冲突需求,是开发更复杂觅食模型的关键特征,前景广阔。
Predation risk and floral rewards: How pollinators balance these conflicts and the consequences on plant fitness
Foraging behavior of pollinators is shaped by, among other factors, the conflict between maximizing resource intake and minimizing predation risk; yet, empirical studies quantifying variation in both forces are rare, compared to those investigating each separately. Here, we discuss the importance of simultaneously assessing bottom-up and top-down forces in the study of plant-pollinator interactions, and propose a conceptual and testable graphical hypothesis for pollinator foraging behavior and plant fitness outcomes as a function of varying floral rewards and predation risk. In low predation risk scenarios, no noticeable changes in pollinator foraging behavior are expected, with reward levels affecting only the activity threshold. However, as predation risk increases we propose that there is a decrease in foraging behavior, with a steeper decline as plants are more rewarding and profitable. Lastly, in high predation risk scenarios, we expect foraging to approach zero, regardless of floral rewards. Thus, we propose that pollinator foraging behavior follows an inverse S-shape curve, with more pronounced changes in foraging activity at intermediate levels of predation risk, especially in high reward systems. We present empirical evidence that is consistent with this hypothesis. In terms of the consequences for plant fitness, we propose that specialized plant-pollinator systems should be more vulnerable to increased predation risk, with a steeper and faster decline in plant fitness, compared with generalist systems, in which pollinator redundancy can delay or buffer the effect of predators. Moreover, whereas we expect that specialist systems follows a similar inverse S-shape curve, in generalist systems we propose three different scenarios as a function not only of reward level but also compatibility, mating-system, and the interplay between growth form and floral display. The incorporation of trade-offs in pollinator behavior balancing the conflicting demands between feeding and predation risk has a promising future as a key feature enabling the development of more complex foraging models.