新型双眼视觉功能周界参考数据库:随机临床试验

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Vincent Michael Patella OD , Nevin W. El-Nimri OD, PhD , John G. Flanagan PhD , Mary K. Durbin PhD , Timothy Bossie OD , Derek Y. Ho MD, PhD , Mayra Tafreshi MBA , Michael A. Chaglasian OD , David Kasanoff OD , Satoshi Inoue MSc , Sasan Moghimi MD , Takashi Nishida MD, PhD , Murray Fingeret OD , Robert N. Weinreb MD
{"title":"新型双眼视觉功能周界参考数据库:随机临床试验","authors":"Vincent Michael Patella OD ,&nbsp;Nevin W. El-Nimri OD, PhD ,&nbsp;John G. Flanagan PhD ,&nbsp;Mary K. Durbin PhD ,&nbsp;Timothy Bossie OD ,&nbsp;Derek Y. Ho MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mayra Tafreshi MBA ,&nbsp;Michael A. Chaglasian OD ,&nbsp;David Kasanoff OD ,&nbsp;Satoshi Inoue MSc ,&nbsp;Sasan Moghimi MD ,&nbsp;Takashi Nishida MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Murray Fingeret OD ,&nbsp;Robert N. Weinreb MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To construct a comprehensive reference database (RDB) for a novel binocular automated perimeter.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A four-site prospective randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects and Controls</h3><p>Three hundred fifty-six healthy subjects without ocular conditions that might affect visual function were categorized into 7 age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects underwent comprehensive ocular examination of both eyes before enrollment. Using the TEMPO/IMOvifa automated perimeter (Topcon Healthcare/CREWT Medical Systems), each subject completed 4 binocular threshold visual field (VF) tests during a single visit: First, practice 24-2 and 10-2 tests were obtained from both eyes. Next, study 24-2 and 10-2 tests were obtained from both eyes. Test order of each sequence was randomized, and the tests were conducted under standard automated perimetry testing conditions: Goldmann stimulus size III, 3183 cd/m<sup>2</sup> maximum stimulus intensity, and background intensity of 10 cd/m<sup>2</sup>, using AIZE-Rapid test strategy. Standard VF reliability indices were assessed. For each subject, 24-2 and 10-2 test results from 1 randomly selected eye were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Perimetric threshold sensitivity and reference limits for each test analysis parameter.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ages of the study cohort were widely distributed, with a mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 52.3 (18.5) years. Sex assignment was 44.0% male and 56.0% female. The majority of subjects self-identified as White (67.4%), followed by Black or African American (13.5%) and Asian (8.7%), with 14.6% self-identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean sensitivity (SD) was 29.1 (1.3) decibels (dB) for the 24-2 and 32.4 (1.0) dB for the 10-2 test. For the 24-2 and 10-2, mean sensitivity (SD) age-related changes averaged −0.06 (0.01) dB and −0.05 (0.01) dB per year, respectively. The normal range of pointwise threshold sensitivity increased with eccentricity and showed asymmetry around the mean, particularly notable in the 24-2 test. Mean (SD) binocular test duration was 3.18 (0.38) minutes (1 minute 35 seconds per eye) for the 24-2 test and 3.58 (0.43) minutes (1 minute 47 seconds per eye) for the 10-2 test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An RDB for the TEMPO/IMOvifa perimeter was established, highlighting the significance of considering both age and stimulus eccentricity in interpreting threshold VF test results.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001192/pdfft?md5=ec0b7377fc17660ad95c7721e62a1e84&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524001192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reference Database for a Novel Binocular Visual Function Perimeter: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Michael Patella OD ,&nbsp;Nevin W. El-Nimri OD, PhD ,&nbsp;John G. Flanagan PhD ,&nbsp;Mary K. Durbin PhD ,&nbsp;Timothy Bossie OD ,&nbsp;Derek Y. Ho MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mayra Tafreshi MBA ,&nbsp;Michael A. Chaglasian OD ,&nbsp;David Kasanoff OD ,&nbsp;Satoshi Inoue MSc ,&nbsp;Sasan Moghimi MD ,&nbsp;Takashi Nishida MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Murray Fingeret OD ,&nbsp;Robert N. Weinreb MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To construct a comprehensive reference database (RDB) for a novel binocular automated perimeter.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A four-site prospective randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects and Controls</h3><p>Three hundred fifty-six healthy subjects without ocular conditions that might affect visual function were categorized into 7 age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects underwent comprehensive ocular examination of both eyes before enrollment. Using the TEMPO/IMOvifa automated perimeter (Topcon Healthcare/CREWT Medical Systems), each subject completed 4 binocular threshold visual field (VF) tests during a single visit: First, practice 24-2 and 10-2 tests were obtained from both eyes. Next, study 24-2 and 10-2 tests were obtained from both eyes. Test order of each sequence was randomized, and the tests were conducted under standard automated perimetry testing conditions: Goldmann stimulus size III, 3183 cd/m<sup>2</sup> maximum stimulus intensity, and background intensity of 10 cd/m<sup>2</sup>, using AIZE-Rapid test strategy. Standard VF reliability indices were assessed. For each subject, 24-2 and 10-2 test results from 1 randomly selected eye were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Perimetric threshold sensitivity and reference limits for each test analysis parameter.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ages of the study cohort were widely distributed, with a mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 52.3 (18.5) years. Sex assignment was 44.0% male and 56.0% female. The majority of subjects self-identified as White (67.4%), followed by Black or African American (13.5%) and Asian (8.7%), with 14.6% self-identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean sensitivity (SD) was 29.1 (1.3) decibels (dB) for the 24-2 and 32.4 (1.0) dB for the 10-2 test. For the 24-2 and 10-2, mean sensitivity (SD) age-related changes averaged −0.06 (0.01) dB and −0.05 (0.01) dB per year, respectively. The normal range of pointwise threshold sensitivity increased with eccentricity and showed asymmetry around the mean, particularly notable in the 24-2 test. Mean (SD) binocular test duration was 3.18 (0.38) minutes (1 minute 35 seconds per eye) for the 24-2 test and 3.58 (0.43) minutes (1 minute 47 seconds per eye) for the 10-2 test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An RDB for the TEMPO/IMOvifa perimeter was established, highlighting the significance of considering both age and stimulus eccentricity in interpreting threshold VF test results.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001192/pdfft?md5=ec0b7377fc17660ad95c7721e62a1e84&pid=1-s2.0-S2666914524001192-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为新型双眼自动周界构建一个综合参考数据库(RDB)。方法受试者在入组前接受双眼综合眼科检查。使用 TEMPO/IMOvifa 自动周波仪(Topcon Healthcare/CREWT Medical Systems),每位受试者在一次就诊中完成 4 次双眼阈值视野(VF)测试:首先,从双眼获得练习 24-2 和 10-2 测试结果。然后,进行双眼 24-2 和 10-2 研究测试。每个序列的测试顺序都是随机的,测试在标准自动视力测试条件下进行:戈德曼刺激大小为 III,最大刺激强度为 3183 cd/m2,背景强度为 10 cd/m2,采用 AIZE-Rapid 测试策略。对标准 VF 可靠性指数进行了评估。对每个受试者随机选取的 1 只眼睛的 24-2 和 10-2 测试结果进行分析。结果研究对象的年龄分布广泛,平均年龄(标准差 [SD])为 52.3 (18.5)岁。男性占 44.0%,女性占 56.0%。大多数受试者自认为是白人(67.4%),其次是黑人或非裔美国人(13.5%)和亚裔(8.7%),14.6%自认为是西班牙裔或拉丁裔。24-2 测试的平均灵敏度(标清)为 29.1 (1.3) 分贝,10-2 测试的平均灵敏度(标清)为 32.4 (1.0) 分贝。在 24-2 和 10-2 测试中,与年龄有关的平均灵敏度(标度)变化分别为每年-0.06 (0.01) 分贝和-0.05 (0.01) 分贝。点阈灵敏度的正常范围随偏心率的增加而增大,并在平均值周围表现出不对称,这在 24-2 测试中尤为明显。24-2 测试的平均(标清)双眼测试时间为 3.18 (0.38) 分钟(每只眼 1 分 35 秒),10-2 测试的平均(标清)双眼测试时间为 3.58 (0.43) 分钟(每只眼 1 分 47 秒)。结论建立了TEMPO/IMOvifa周界的RDB,强调了在解释阈值VF测试结果时同时考虑年龄和刺激偏心率的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reference Database for a Novel Binocular Visual Function Perimeter: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Purpose

To construct a comprehensive reference database (RDB) for a novel binocular automated perimeter.

Design

A four-site prospective randomized clinical trial.

Subjects and Controls

Three hundred fifty-six healthy subjects without ocular conditions that might affect visual function were categorized into 7 age groups.

Methods

Subjects underwent comprehensive ocular examination of both eyes before enrollment. Using the TEMPO/IMOvifa automated perimeter (Topcon Healthcare/CREWT Medical Systems), each subject completed 4 binocular threshold visual field (VF) tests during a single visit: First, practice 24-2 and 10-2 tests were obtained from both eyes. Next, study 24-2 and 10-2 tests were obtained from both eyes. Test order of each sequence was randomized, and the tests were conducted under standard automated perimetry testing conditions: Goldmann stimulus size III, 3183 cd/m2 maximum stimulus intensity, and background intensity of 10 cd/m2, using AIZE-Rapid test strategy. Standard VF reliability indices were assessed. For each subject, 24-2 and 10-2 test results from 1 randomly selected eye were analyzed.

Main Outcome Measures

Perimetric threshold sensitivity and reference limits for each test analysis parameter.

Results

The ages of the study cohort were widely distributed, with a mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 52.3 (18.5) years. Sex assignment was 44.0% male and 56.0% female. The majority of subjects self-identified as White (67.4%), followed by Black or African American (13.5%) and Asian (8.7%), with 14.6% self-identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean sensitivity (SD) was 29.1 (1.3) decibels (dB) for the 24-2 and 32.4 (1.0) dB for the 10-2 test. For the 24-2 and 10-2, mean sensitivity (SD) age-related changes averaged −0.06 (0.01) dB and −0.05 (0.01) dB per year, respectively. The normal range of pointwise threshold sensitivity increased with eccentricity and showed asymmetry around the mean, particularly notable in the 24-2 test. Mean (SD) binocular test duration was 3.18 (0.38) minutes (1 minute 35 seconds per eye) for the 24-2 test and 3.58 (0.43) minutes (1 minute 47 seconds per eye) for the 10-2 test.

Conclusions

An RDB for the TEMPO/IMOvifa perimeter was established, highlighting the significance of considering both age and stimulus eccentricity in interpreting threshold VF test results.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信