Thomas J. Kelly , David T. Mannion , Christine O'Connor , Kieran N. Kilcawley
{"title":"用于爱尔兰威士忌挥发性成分分析的顶空固相微萃取与常规和综合气相色谱质谱法的比较","authors":"Thomas J. Kelly , David T. Mannion , Christine O'Connor , Kieran N. Kilcawley","doi":"10.1016/j.talo.2024.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whiskey is a traditional distilled product produced on the island of Ireland that is currently experiencing a major expansion in export volume. Different styles of Irish whiskey exist, however only some very limited published information exists on the volatile congener profile of the different styles of Irish whiskey. Such information is potentially indispensable from a quality, flavour and authenticity perspective. As gas chromatography is the established analytical method of choice to identify volatile congeners, this study compared headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) using conventional gas chromatography single quadrupole mass spectrometry, to HS-SPME and HS-SPME-Arrow using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) modulated using reverse flow in tandem with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) detection. Six representative Irish whiskey samples were evaluated consisting of new make spirit and mature whiskies representing Single Malts, Pot Stills and Blends. The number of volatile congeners identified in these samples by HS-SPME/HS-SPME Arrow GC×GC-TOFMS was approximately twice that detected by conventional HS-SPME GCMS. In total 145 unique individual volatile congeners, excluding ethanol were identified, with the majority consisting of esters, but also benzenes, alcohols, aldehydes, terpenoids, furans, ketones, alkanes, alkenes, norisoprenoids, acetals, acids, lactones and phenols. The use of HS-SPME Arrow GC×GC-TOFMS significantly enhances the number of volatile congeners that can be identified and therefore provides much more information that can convey insights into product quality, consistency, flavour and also for authentication purposes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":436,"journal":{"name":"Talanta Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831924000602/pdfft?md5=cc6391f7f0ea3c3d4dd0229e2236af3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666831924000602-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of head space solid phase micro extraction with conventional and comprehensive gas chromatography mass spectrometry for volatile profiling of Irish whiskey\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Kelly , David T. Mannion , Christine O'Connor , Kieran N. Kilcawley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talo.2024.100346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Whiskey is a traditional distilled product produced on the island of Ireland that is currently experiencing a major expansion in export volume. Different styles of Irish whiskey exist, however only some very limited published information exists on the volatile congener profile of the different styles of Irish whiskey. Such information is potentially indispensable from a quality, flavour and authenticity perspective. As gas chromatography is the established analytical method of choice to identify volatile congeners, this study compared headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) using conventional gas chromatography single quadrupole mass spectrometry, to HS-SPME and HS-SPME-Arrow using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) modulated using reverse flow in tandem with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) detection. Six representative Irish whiskey samples were evaluated consisting of new make spirit and mature whiskies representing Single Malts, Pot Stills and Blends. The number of volatile congeners identified in these samples by HS-SPME/HS-SPME Arrow GC×GC-TOFMS was approximately twice that detected by conventional HS-SPME GCMS. In total 145 unique individual volatile congeners, excluding ethanol were identified, with the majority consisting of esters, but also benzenes, alcohols, aldehydes, terpenoids, furans, ketones, alkanes, alkenes, norisoprenoids, acetals, acids, lactones and phenols. The use of HS-SPME Arrow GC×GC-TOFMS significantly enhances the number of volatile congeners that can be identified and therefore provides much more information that can convey insights into product quality, consistency, flavour and also for authentication purposes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta Open\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831924000602/pdfft?md5=cc6391f7f0ea3c3d4dd0229e2236af3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666831924000602-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831924000602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831924000602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of head space solid phase micro extraction with conventional and comprehensive gas chromatography mass spectrometry for volatile profiling of Irish whiskey
Whiskey is a traditional distilled product produced on the island of Ireland that is currently experiencing a major expansion in export volume. Different styles of Irish whiskey exist, however only some very limited published information exists on the volatile congener profile of the different styles of Irish whiskey. Such information is potentially indispensable from a quality, flavour and authenticity perspective. As gas chromatography is the established analytical method of choice to identify volatile congeners, this study compared headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) using conventional gas chromatography single quadrupole mass spectrometry, to HS-SPME and HS-SPME-Arrow using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) modulated using reverse flow in tandem with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) detection. Six representative Irish whiskey samples were evaluated consisting of new make spirit and mature whiskies representing Single Malts, Pot Stills and Blends. The number of volatile congeners identified in these samples by HS-SPME/HS-SPME Arrow GC×GC-TOFMS was approximately twice that detected by conventional HS-SPME GCMS. In total 145 unique individual volatile congeners, excluding ethanol were identified, with the majority consisting of esters, but also benzenes, alcohols, aldehydes, terpenoids, furans, ketones, alkanes, alkenes, norisoprenoids, acetals, acids, lactones and phenols. The use of HS-SPME Arrow GC×GC-TOFMS significantly enhances the number of volatile congeners that can be identified and therefore provides much more information that can convey insights into product quality, consistency, flavour and also for authentication purposes.