霍布斯笔下的抵抗权是什么意思?一个明显的陷阱

L. Furlan
{"title":"霍布斯笔下的抵抗权是什么意思?一个明显的陷阱","authors":"L. Furlan","doi":"10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v43i1p81-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is about the meaning of right of resistance in Thomas Hobbes political theory. It is reasonable to say that right of resistance it might be a trap, put up by Hobbes himself, and taken as the basis of his theory. But what is the limit for that idea? I try to point out how to dissolve that apparent trap and show that an invitation to right of resist it is not what Hobbes was doing at that time.","PeriodicalId":175674,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qual é o sentido do direito de resistência em Hobbes? Uma aparente armadilha\",\"authors\":\"L. Furlan\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v43i1p81-92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is about the meaning of right of resistance in Thomas Hobbes political theory. It is reasonable to say that right of resistance it might be a trap, put up by Hobbes himself, and taken as the basis of his theory. But what is the limit for that idea? I try to point out how to dissolve that apparent trap and show that an invitation to right of resist it is not what Hobbes was doing at that time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v43i1p81-92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v43i1p81-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨抵抗权在托马斯-霍布斯政治理论中的意义。按理说,抵抗权可能是霍布斯自己设下的一个陷阱,并以此作为其理论的基础。但这一观点的限度是什么?我嘗試指出如何解開這個明顯的陷阱,並說明抵抗權的邀請並不是霍布斯當時所做的事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qual é o sentido do direito de resistência em Hobbes? Uma aparente armadilha
This paper is about the meaning of right of resistance in Thomas Hobbes political theory. It is reasonable to say that right of resistance it might be a trap, put up by Hobbes himself, and taken as the basis of his theory. But what is the limit for that idea? I try to point out how to dissolve that apparent trap and show that an invitation to right of resist it is not what Hobbes was doing at that time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信