{"title":"我们能认为机器有意识吗?机器意识归属所面临的哲学问题概览","authors":"Parker Settecase","doi":"10.1142/s2705078524500073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I’ll examine whether we could be justified in attributing consciousness to artificial intelligent systems. First, I’ll give a brief history of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and get clear on the terms I’ll be using. Second, I’ll briefly review the kinds of AI programs on offer today, identifying which research program I think provides the best candidate for machine consciousness. Lastly, I’ll consider the three most plausible ways of knowing whether a machine is conscious: (1) an AI demonstrates a sufficient level of organizational similarity to that of a human thinker, (2) an inference to the best explanation, and (3) what I call “punting to panpsychism”, i.e., the idea that if everything is conscious, then we get machine consciousness in AI for free. However, I argue that all three of these methods for attributing machine consciousness are inadequate since they each face serious philosophical problems which I will survey and specifically tailor to each method.","PeriodicalId":484258,"journal":{"name":"Journal of artificial intelligence and consciousness","volume":"1 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can We Think Machines are Conscious? A Survey of Philosophical Problems Facing the Attribution of Consciousness to Machines\",\"authors\":\"Parker Settecase\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2705078524500073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I’ll examine whether we could be justified in attributing consciousness to artificial intelligent systems. First, I’ll give a brief history of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and get clear on the terms I’ll be using. Second, I’ll briefly review the kinds of AI programs on offer today, identifying which research program I think provides the best candidate for machine consciousness. Lastly, I’ll consider the three most plausible ways of knowing whether a machine is conscious: (1) an AI demonstrates a sufficient level of organizational similarity to that of a human thinker, (2) an inference to the best explanation, and (3) what I call “punting to panpsychism”, i.e., the idea that if everything is conscious, then we get machine consciousness in AI for free. However, I argue that all three of these methods for attributing machine consciousness are inadequate since they each face serious philosophical problems which I will survey and specifically tailor to each method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of artificial intelligence and consciousness\",\"volume\":\"1 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of artificial intelligence and consciousness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078524500073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of artificial intelligence and consciousness","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078524500073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本文中,我将探讨我们是否有理由将意识归因于人工智能系统。首先,我将简要介绍人工智能(AI)概念的历史,并明确我将使用的术语。其次,我将简要回顾当今人工智能程序的种类,并指出我认为哪种研究程序是机器意识的最佳候选者。最后,我会考虑了解机器是否有意识的三种最可信的方法:(1)人工智能在组织上与人类思想家有足够程度的相似性;(2)推论出最佳解释;(3)我称之为 "向泛心理主义(punting to panpsychism)",即如果万物都有意识,那么我们就能在人工智能中免费获得机器意识。然而,我认为这三种归因于机器意识的方法都是不充分的,因为它们都面临着严重的哲学问题,我将对这些问题进行调查,并针对每种方法进行具体分析。
Can We Think Machines are Conscious? A Survey of Philosophical Problems Facing the Attribution of Consciousness to Machines
In this paper, I’ll examine whether we could be justified in attributing consciousness to artificial intelligent systems. First, I’ll give a brief history of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and get clear on the terms I’ll be using. Second, I’ll briefly review the kinds of AI programs on offer today, identifying which research program I think provides the best candidate for machine consciousness. Lastly, I’ll consider the three most plausible ways of knowing whether a machine is conscious: (1) an AI demonstrates a sufficient level of organizational similarity to that of a human thinker, (2) an inference to the best explanation, and (3) what I call “punting to panpsychism”, i.e., the idea that if everything is conscious, then we get machine consciousness in AI for free. However, I argue that all three of these methods for attributing machine consciousness are inadequate since they each face serious philosophical problems which I will survey and specifically tailor to each method.