补充基于芽孢杆菌的直接饲喂微生物菌剂可提高泌乳奶牛的饲料效率

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Marta Terré, Norbert Prat, D. Sabrià, O. Queiroz, Jens N. Joergensen, G. Copani, B. Cappellozza
{"title":"补充基于芽孢杆菌的直接饲喂微生物菌剂可提高泌乳奶牛的饲料效率","authors":"Marta Terré, Norbert Prat, D. Sabrià, O. Queiroz, Jens N. Joergensen, G. Copani, B. Cappellozza","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) on performance and nutrient digestibility of lactating dairy cows. Seventy-six lactating (42 ± 6 DIM) Holstein-Friesian primiparous and multiparous cows were enrolled to a 16-wk experiment. Cows were blocked by lactation number and DIM and within blocks, assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments: 1) basal partial mixed ration (PMR) without DFM addition (n = 38; CON) or 2) basal PMR with the addition of 3 g/head per day of a DFM containing B. licheniformis 809 and B. subtilis 810 (n = 38; BOVACILLUS™, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark; DFM). The DFM was mixed in a protein-based pellet, whereas the CON group was fed the same pellet without DFM (0.6 kg/cow per day). The PMR contained (DM basis) 50% of forage and 48% of a concentrate feed based on corn meal, soybean meal, wheat meal, wheat middlings, and a mineral-vitamin premix, with the remaining part of the diet being represented by the pellet used as a carrier for the treatments (CON and DFM). Dry matter intake, milk yield, and production efficiency were recorded daily, whereas milk protein and fat concentrations were recorded using electronic milk meters. An additional milk sample was collected every second week of the study for milk composition. On wk 15 of the study, fecal samples were collected from each cow for apparent nutrient digestibility calculation. All data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (version 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). No treatment effects were observed on cow final BW, daily DMI, milk yield, ECM, ECM efficiency, milk composition (yield or content), and SCC (P ≥ 0.12). However, cows fed DFM had a greater feed and N efficiency (P ≤ 0.03) compared to cows fed CON. Moreover, DM digestibility tended to be greater for DFM-fed cows when compared to CON (P = 0.10), whereas no further nutrient digestibility differences were observed (P ≥ 0.24). In summary, supplementing a DFM containing Bacillus licheniformis and B. subtilis benefited feed efficiency of lactating dairy cows fed a PMR, while also tending to improve the digestibility of dry matter.","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supplementing a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial improves feed efficiency in lactating dairy cows\",\"authors\":\"Marta Terré, Norbert Prat, D. Sabrià, O. Queiroz, Jens N. Joergensen, G. Copani, B. Cappellozza\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) on performance and nutrient digestibility of lactating dairy cows. Seventy-six lactating (42 ± 6 DIM) Holstein-Friesian primiparous and multiparous cows were enrolled to a 16-wk experiment. Cows were blocked by lactation number and DIM and within blocks, assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments: 1) basal partial mixed ration (PMR) without DFM addition (n = 38; CON) or 2) basal PMR with the addition of 3 g/head per day of a DFM containing B. licheniformis 809 and B. subtilis 810 (n = 38; BOVACILLUS™, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark; DFM). The DFM was mixed in a protein-based pellet, whereas the CON group was fed the same pellet without DFM (0.6 kg/cow per day). The PMR contained (DM basis) 50% of forage and 48% of a concentrate feed based on corn meal, soybean meal, wheat meal, wheat middlings, and a mineral-vitamin premix, with the remaining part of the diet being represented by the pellet used as a carrier for the treatments (CON and DFM). Dry matter intake, milk yield, and production efficiency were recorded daily, whereas milk protein and fat concentrations were recorded using electronic milk meters. An additional milk sample was collected every second week of the study for milk composition. On wk 15 of the study, fecal samples were collected from each cow for apparent nutrient digestibility calculation. All data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (version 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). No treatment effects were observed on cow final BW, daily DMI, milk yield, ECM, ECM efficiency, milk composition (yield or content), and SCC (P ≥ 0.12). However, cows fed DFM had a greater feed and N efficiency (P ≤ 0.03) compared to cows fed CON. Moreover, DM digestibility tended to be greater for DFM-fed cows when compared to CON (P = 0.10), whereas no further nutrient digestibility differences were observed (P ≥ 0.24). In summary, supplementing a DFM containing Bacillus licheniformis and B. subtilis benefited feed efficiency of lactating dairy cows fed a PMR, while also tending to improve the digestibility of dry matter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本实验旨在评估饲喂基于芽孢杆菌的直接饲喂微生物(DFM)对泌乳奶牛的生产性能和营养消化率的影响。76 头泌乳期(42 ± 6 DIM)荷斯坦-弗里斯兰初产和多产奶牛参加了为期 16 周的实验。奶牛按泌乳数和DIM分组,在组内分配到两种处理中的一种:1) 不添加 DFM 的基础部分混合饲料(PMR)(n = 38;CON)或 2) 每天添加 3 克/头含地衣芽孢杆菌 809 和枯草芽孢杆菌 810 的 DFM 的基础 PMR(n = 38;BOVACILLUS™,Chr. Hansen A/S,Hørsholm,Denmark;DFM)。DFM 混合在以蛋白质为基础的颗粒饲料中,而 CON 组则饲喂不含 DFM 的相同颗粒饲料(每头奶牛每天 0.6 千克)。PMR 含有(以 DM 计)50% 的饲草和 48% 的精饲料,精饲料基于玉米粉、大豆粉、小麦粉、小麦胚芽和矿物质-维生素预混料,日粮的剩余部分由作为处理(CON 和 DFM)载体的颗粒饲料构成。每天记录干物质摄入量、产奶量和生产效率,使用电子奶量计记录牛奶蛋白质和脂肪浓度。研究期间,每隔一周收集一次额外的牛奶样本,以检测牛奶成分。在研究的第 15 周,收集每头奶牛的粪便样本,计算表观营养消化率。所有数据均使用 SAS 的 MIXED 程序(版本 9.4;SAS Inst.)未观察到处理对奶牛最终体重、日 DMI、产奶量、ECM、ECM 效率、牛奶成分(产量或含量)和 SCC 有任何影响(P ≥ 0.12)。然而,与饲喂 CON 的奶牛相比,饲喂 DFM 的奶牛的饲料和氮效率更高(P ≤ 0.03)。此外,与饲喂CON的奶牛相比,饲喂DFM的奶牛的DM消化率往往更高(P = 0.10),但没有观察到进一步的营养物质消化率差异(P ≥ 0.24)。总之,补充含有地衣芽孢杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的DFM有益于饲喂PMR的泌乳奶牛的饲料效率,同时也倾向于提高干物质的消化率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supplementing a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial improves feed efficiency in lactating dairy cows
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) on performance and nutrient digestibility of lactating dairy cows. Seventy-six lactating (42 ± 6 DIM) Holstein-Friesian primiparous and multiparous cows were enrolled to a 16-wk experiment. Cows were blocked by lactation number and DIM and within blocks, assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments: 1) basal partial mixed ration (PMR) without DFM addition (n = 38; CON) or 2) basal PMR with the addition of 3 g/head per day of a DFM containing B. licheniformis 809 and B. subtilis 810 (n = 38; BOVACILLUS™, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark; DFM). The DFM was mixed in a protein-based pellet, whereas the CON group was fed the same pellet without DFM (0.6 kg/cow per day). The PMR contained (DM basis) 50% of forage and 48% of a concentrate feed based on corn meal, soybean meal, wheat meal, wheat middlings, and a mineral-vitamin premix, with the remaining part of the diet being represented by the pellet used as a carrier for the treatments (CON and DFM). Dry matter intake, milk yield, and production efficiency were recorded daily, whereas milk protein and fat concentrations were recorded using electronic milk meters. An additional milk sample was collected every second week of the study for milk composition. On wk 15 of the study, fecal samples were collected from each cow for apparent nutrient digestibility calculation. All data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (version 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). No treatment effects were observed on cow final BW, daily DMI, milk yield, ECM, ECM efficiency, milk composition (yield or content), and SCC (P ≥ 0.12). However, cows fed DFM had a greater feed and N efficiency (P ≤ 0.03) compared to cows fed CON. Moreover, DM digestibility tended to be greater for DFM-fed cows when compared to CON (P = 0.10), whereas no further nutrient digestibility differences were observed (P ≥ 0.24). In summary, supplementing a DFM containing Bacillus licheniformis and B. subtilis benefited feed efficiency of lactating dairy cows fed a PMR, while also tending to improve the digestibility of dry matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信