片段笔记扎丽娜的分界线

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 N/A ART
Art History Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1093/arthis/ulae015
Aparna Kumar
{"title":"片段笔记扎丽娜的分界线","authors":"Aparna Kumar","doi":"10.1093/arthis/ulae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay provides a new reading of Zarina’s iconic woodcut print Dividing Line (2001), with an eye to unravelling the work’s relationship to the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent and the wider landscape of partition history. By considering Zarina’s use of paper, map and gouge, this reading argues that Dividing Line embodies a method and ethics of writing decolonial histories of partition, with important implications for how to understand and respond to the violent impact of postcolonial border-making on (art) history. The essay, written as a series of notes, seeks to account for the distinct forms and temporalities of writing for partition history that Dividing Line both produces and demands of the art historian. In its form, the essay mobilises the note as a fragmentary mode of writing, responsive to the specific dynamics of continuity and discontinuity endemic to the experience of lines, borders and partition in Dividing Line.","PeriodicalId":8456,"journal":{"name":"Art History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes on a Fragment: Zarina’s Dividing Line\",\"authors\":\"Aparna Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arthis/ulae015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This essay provides a new reading of Zarina’s iconic woodcut print Dividing Line (2001), with an eye to unravelling the work’s relationship to the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent and the wider landscape of partition history. By considering Zarina’s use of paper, map and gouge, this reading argues that Dividing Line embodies a method and ethics of writing decolonial histories of partition, with important implications for how to understand and respond to the violent impact of postcolonial border-making on (art) history. The essay, written as a series of notes, seeks to account for the distinct forms and temporalities of writing for partition history that Dividing Line both produces and demands of the art historian. In its form, the essay mobilises the note as a fragmentary mode of writing, responsive to the specific dynamics of continuity and discontinuity endemic to the experience of lines, borders and partition in Dividing Line.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arthis/ulae015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arthis/ulae015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章对扎里纳的标志性木刻版画《分界线》(2001 年)进行了新的解读,旨在揭示该作品与 1947 年印度次大陆分治以及更广泛的分治史的关系。通过对扎里纳使用的纸张、地图和刻刀的研究,本文认为《分界线》体现了一种书写非殖民分治史的方法和伦理,对于如何理解和应对后殖民时期边界制造对(艺术)史的暴力影响具有重要意义。这篇文章是以一系列注释的形式撰写的,试图说明《分界线》既产生又要求艺术史学家书写分治史的独特形式和时间性。在形式上,文章将笔记作为一种零散的写作模式,对《分割线》中的线条、边界和分治经验所特有的连续性和非连续性的特定动态做出回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Notes on a Fragment: Zarina’s Dividing Line
This essay provides a new reading of Zarina’s iconic woodcut print Dividing Line (2001), with an eye to unravelling the work’s relationship to the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent and the wider landscape of partition history. By considering Zarina’s use of paper, map and gouge, this reading argues that Dividing Line embodies a method and ethics of writing decolonial histories of partition, with important implications for how to understand and respond to the violent impact of postcolonial border-making on (art) history. The essay, written as a series of notes, seeks to account for the distinct forms and temporalities of writing for partition history that Dividing Line both produces and demands of the art historian. In its form, the essay mobilises the note as a fragmentary mode of writing, responsive to the specific dynamics of continuity and discontinuity endemic to the experience of lines, borders and partition in Dividing Line.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Art History is a refereed journal that publishes essays and reviews on all aspects, areas and periods of the history of art, from a diversity of perspectives. Founded in 1978, it has established an international reputation for publishing innovative essays at the cutting edge of contemporary scholarship, whether on earlier or more recent periods. At the forefront of scholarly enquiry, Art History is opening up the discipline to new developments and to interdisciplinary and cross-cultural approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信