丘疹性荨麻疹临床试验中疾病严重程度和生活质量结果测量的趋势:范围综述

Q3 Medicine
G. Pathak, Kush Patel, Christopher Wachuku, T. Truong, Priya Agarwal, Babar K. Rao
{"title":"丘疹性荨麻疹临床试验中疾病严重程度和生活质量结果测量的趋势:范围综述","authors":"G. Pathak, Kush Patel, Christopher Wachuku, T. Truong, Priya Agarwal, Babar K. Rao","doi":"10.1002/ski2.429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pemphigus represents a spectrum of autoimmune‐mediated blistering diseases associated with high morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Despite an increase in pemphigus clinical trials, the varied instrument measurements of disease severity and QoL outcomes make comparisons between studies challenging. This study aimed to evaluate trends in the use of disease severity and QoL outcome measurements in pemphigus clinical trials. A review of pemphigus clinical trials was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up until September 2023. Only pemphigus randomized clinical trials that assessed at least one disease severity and/or QoL outcome were included. Overall, 53 clinical trials were eligible for this review. All clinical trials evaluated a disease severity outcome, with the Pemphigus Disease Area Index being the most used validated questionnaire (28.3% of trials) and more popular after 2015 (47.8% of trials since). The autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (7.6%) and visual analogue measurements (7.6%) have fallen out of favour. Most studies now include lab parameters (56.5% of trials after 2015), with anti‐desmoglein 1 and 3 antibody levels (30.2%), immunoglobulins (IgG and/or IgM and IgA) (11.3%), and anti‐drug antibody levels (7.6%) being frequently evaluated. A small portion of trials evaluated QoL (26.5% of studies), with the autoimmune bullous quality of life being the most common (15.1%), however QoL utilization as an outcome measure has been increasing since 2015 (61.1% of trials since). Standardising the use of validated outcome measurements allows for better data interpretation, comparability and clinical application of results.","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":"58 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in disease severity and quality of life outcome measures in pemphigus clinical trials: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"G. Pathak, Kush Patel, Christopher Wachuku, T. Truong, Priya Agarwal, Babar K. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ski2.429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pemphigus represents a spectrum of autoimmune‐mediated blistering diseases associated with high morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Despite an increase in pemphigus clinical trials, the varied instrument measurements of disease severity and QoL outcomes make comparisons between studies challenging. This study aimed to evaluate trends in the use of disease severity and QoL outcome measurements in pemphigus clinical trials. A review of pemphigus clinical trials was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up until September 2023. Only pemphigus randomized clinical trials that assessed at least one disease severity and/or QoL outcome were included. Overall, 53 clinical trials were eligible for this review. All clinical trials evaluated a disease severity outcome, with the Pemphigus Disease Area Index being the most used validated questionnaire (28.3% of trials) and more popular after 2015 (47.8% of trials since). The autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (7.6%) and visual analogue measurements (7.6%) have fallen out of favour. Most studies now include lab parameters (56.5% of trials after 2015), with anti‐desmoglein 1 and 3 antibody levels (30.2%), immunoglobulins (IgG and/or IgM and IgA) (11.3%), and anti‐drug antibody levels (7.6%) being frequently evaluated. A small portion of trials evaluated QoL (26.5% of studies), with the autoimmune bullous quality of life being the most common (15.1%), however QoL utilization as an outcome measure has been increasing since 2015 (61.1% of trials since). Standardising the use of validated outcome measurements allows for better data interpretation, comparability and clinical application of results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin health and disease\",\"volume\":\"58 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin health and disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丘疹性荨麻疹是一种由自身免疫介导的水疱性疾病,具有发病率高、死亡率高和生活质量(QoL)下降的特点。尽管丘疹性荨麻疹的临床试验越来越多,但由于疾病严重程度和 QoL 结果的测量工具各不相同,因此对不同研究进行比较具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估丘疹性荨麻疹临床试验中疾病严重程度和 QoL 结果测量方法的使用趋势。我们使用 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Reviews 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库对截至 2023 年 9 月的丘疹性荨麻疹临床试验进行了回顾。仅纳入了评估至少一种疾病严重程度和/或 QoL 结果的丘疹性荨麻疹随机临床试验。共有 53 项临床试验符合本综述的要求。所有临床试验都评估了疾病严重程度结果,其中丘疹性荨麻疹疾病面积指数是使用最多的有效问卷(占试验的28.3%),在2015年后更受欢迎(占此后试验的47.8%)。自身免疫性大疱性皮肤病强度评分(7.6%)和视觉模拟测量(7.6%)已不再受欢迎。目前,大多数研究都包括实验室参数(2015年后的试验占56.5%),其中抗去疱疹蛋白1和3抗体水平(30.2%)、免疫球蛋白(IgG和/或IgM和IgA)(11.3%)和抗药物抗体水平(7.6%)是经常评估的项目。一小部分试验对生活质量进行了评估(占研究的26.5%),其中自身免疫性牛皮癣患者的生活质量是最常见的(15.1%),但自2015年以来,将生活质量作为结果测量指标的情况一直在增加(自2015年以来占试验的61.1%)。规范使用经过验证的结果测量指标可以更好地解释数据,提高结果的可比性和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in disease severity and quality of life outcome measures in pemphigus clinical trials: A scoping review
Pemphigus represents a spectrum of autoimmune‐mediated blistering diseases associated with high morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Despite an increase in pemphigus clinical trials, the varied instrument measurements of disease severity and QoL outcomes make comparisons between studies challenging. This study aimed to evaluate trends in the use of disease severity and QoL outcome measurements in pemphigus clinical trials. A review of pemphigus clinical trials was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up until September 2023. Only pemphigus randomized clinical trials that assessed at least one disease severity and/or QoL outcome were included. Overall, 53 clinical trials were eligible for this review. All clinical trials evaluated a disease severity outcome, with the Pemphigus Disease Area Index being the most used validated questionnaire (28.3% of trials) and more popular after 2015 (47.8% of trials since). The autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (7.6%) and visual analogue measurements (7.6%) have fallen out of favour. Most studies now include lab parameters (56.5% of trials after 2015), with anti‐desmoglein 1 and 3 antibody levels (30.2%), immunoglobulins (IgG and/or IgM and IgA) (11.3%), and anti‐drug antibody levels (7.6%) being frequently evaluated. A small portion of trials evaluated QoL (26.5% of studies), with the autoimmune bullous quality of life being the most common (15.1%), however QoL utilization as an outcome measure has been increasing since 2015 (61.1% of trials since). Standardising the use of validated outcome measurements allows for better data interpretation, comparability and clinical application of results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信