多模态话语分析》、《视听翻译》、《破产姐妹》。

Jia Luo
{"title":"多模态话语分析》、《视听翻译》、《破产姐妹》。","authors":"Jia Luo","doi":"10.54691/1byq4m72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China's Insurance Law defines \"workers who have a labor relationship with the insured\" for pure economic interests. According to the current law, when an employer purchases insurance for its employees, the transfer of the insurance claim right can be effective. In this case, should the share of the income of the employer, as a non-natural person, when receiving the employee's death insurance be restricted? This issue is not explicitly stipulated in the law and needs to be discussed. In light of social reality, this article believes that the employer's share of benefits in group accident insurance should be restricted by amending the Insurance Law or supplementing judicial interpretations. If necessary, content that favors the insured and their families can be added. This will save losses and prevent the employer from using the employment relationship to infringe on the legitimate interests of employees.","PeriodicalId":339874,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Discourse Analysis, audiovisual translation, The Broke Sisters.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.54691/1byq4m72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China's Insurance Law defines \\\"workers who have a labor relationship with the insured\\\" for pure economic interests. According to the current law, when an employer purchases insurance for its employees, the transfer of the insurance claim right can be effective. In this case, should the share of the income of the employer, as a non-natural person, when receiving the employee's death insurance be restricted? This issue is not explicitly stipulated in the law and needs to be discussed. In light of social reality, this article believes that the employer's share of benefits in group accident insurance should be restricted by amending the Insurance Law or supplementing judicial interpretations. If necessary, content that favors the insured and their families can be added. This will save losses and prevent the employer from using the employment relationship to infringe on the legitimate interests of employees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54691/1byq4m72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/1byq4m72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国《保险法》对 "与被保险人存在劳动关系的劳动者 "的定义是纯经济利益。根据现行法律规定,用人单位为职工购买保险后,保险金请求权的转移可以生效。在这种情况下,雇主作为非自然人,在领取雇员死亡保险金时,其收入份额是否应受到限制?这个问题法律没有明确规定,需要讨论。结合社会现实,本文认为,应当通过修改《保险法》或补充司法解释的方式,对用人单位在团体意外伤害保险中的保险金份额进行限制。必要时,可以增加有利于被保险人及其家属的内容。这样既能挽回损失,又能防止用人单位利用劳动关系侵害职工的合法权益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimodal Discourse Analysis, audiovisual translation, The Broke Sisters.
China's Insurance Law defines "workers who have a labor relationship with the insured" for pure economic interests. According to the current law, when an employer purchases insurance for its employees, the transfer of the insurance claim right can be effective. In this case, should the share of the income of the employer, as a non-natural person, when receiving the employee's death insurance be restricted? This issue is not explicitly stipulated in the law and needs to be discussed. In light of social reality, this article believes that the employer's share of benefits in group accident insurance should be restricted by amending the Insurance Law or supplementing judicial interpretations. If necessary, content that favors the insured and their families can be added. This will save losses and prevent the employer from using the employment relationship to infringe on the legitimate interests of employees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信