通过选择传统或替代碳源降低生物脱氮过程的成本

IF 3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Energies Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.3390/en17153660
Andrijana Brozinčević, Dijana Grgas, Tea Štefanac, Mirna Habuda-Stanić, Bruno Zelić, Tibela Landeka Dragičević
{"title":"通过选择传统或替代碳源降低生物脱氮过程的成本","authors":"Andrijana Brozinčević, Dijana Grgas, Tea Štefanac, Mirna Habuda-Stanić, Bruno Zelić, Tibela Landeka Dragičević","doi":"10.3390/en17153660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological denitrification is a generally economically viable and reliable technology for nitrate (NO3−-N) and nitrite (NO2−-N) removal from wastewater. Nitrate/nitrite reduction requires an electron donor, which can be supplied from influent wastewater organic compounds, added as an external carbon source, or by endogenous respiration. Decisions regarding the selection of an external carbon source should take into consideration its cost, sludge generation quantity, the rate and efficiency of denitrification, and chemical storage safety. The expense of waste management and external carbon sources accounts for up to 50% of the overall cost of wastewater treatment. The carbon source characteristics required for biological denitrification affect the microbial community structure, denitrification rate, and intermediate products. This review is based on a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review providing information and insight into the topic of the denitrification process using different carbon sources. In this review, the main focus was on discussing alternative carbon sources vs. traditional carbon sources in terms of the carbon source price, C/N ratio, denitrification efficiency and rate, operational parameters, and advantages and disadvantages, as well as the limitations in the denitrification process. Future perspectives may include the operating parameters influencing the stability of the removal performance; the maintenance and improvement of nitrate removal; a study of the diversity of the microbial community; research on the application of new alternative carbon sources in denitrification; and N2O emission detection and minimisation.","PeriodicalId":11557,"journal":{"name":"Energies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Reduction in the Process of Biological Denitrification by Choosing Traditional or Alternative Carbon Sources\",\"authors\":\"Andrijana Brozinčević, Dijana Grgas, Tea Štefanac, Mirna Habuda-Stanić, Bruno Zelić, Tibela Landeka Dragičević\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/en17153660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biological denitrification is a generally economically viable and reliable technology for nitrate (NO3−-N) and nitrite (NO2−-N) removal from wastewater. Nitrate/nitrite reduction requires an electron donor, which can be supplied from influent wastewater organic compounds, added as an external carbon source, or by endogenous respiration. Decisions regarding the selection of an external carbon source should take into consideration its cost, sludge generation quantity, the rate and efficiency of denitrification, and chemical storage safety. The expense of waste management and external carbon sources accounts for up to 50% of the overall cost of wastewater treatment. The carbon source characteristics required for biological denitrification affect the microbial community structure, denitrification rate, and intermediate products. This review is based on a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review providing information and insight into the topic of the denitrification process using different carbon sources. In this review, the main focus was on discussing alternative carbon sources vs. traditional carbon sources in terms of the carbon source price, C/N ratio, denitrification efficiency and rate, operational parameters, and advantages and disadvantages, as well as the limitations in the denitrification process. Future perspectives may include the operating parameters influencing the stability of the removal performance; the maintenance and improvement of nitrate removal; a study of the diversity of the microbial community; research on the application of new alternative carbon sources in denitrification; and N2O emission detection and minimisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153660\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物脱氮是一种去除废水中硝酸盐(NO3--N)和亚硝酸盐(NO2--N)的经济可行且可靠的技术。硝酸盐/亚硝酸盐的还原需要电子供体,电子供体可由废水中的有机化合物、外部碳源或内源呼吸提供。在选择外部碳源时,应考虑其成本、污泥产生量、反硝化速率和效率以及化学储存的安全性。废物管理和外部碳源的费用占污水处理总成本的 50%。生物脱氮所需的碳源特性会影响微生物群落结构、脱氮率和中间产物。本综述基于文献计量分析和系统性文献综述,提供了有关使用不同碳源的反硝化过程的信息和见解。在本综述中,重点讨论了替代碳源与传统碳源在碳源价格、碳/氮比、脱硝效率和速率、操作参数、优缺点以及脱硝过程中的局限性等方面的对比。未来的展望可能包括:影响去除性能稳定性的运行参数;硝酸盐去除的维持和改进;微生物群落多样性研究;新替代碳源在脱硝过程中的应用研究;以及一氧化二氮排放检测和最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Reduction in the Process of Biological Denitrification by Choosing Traditional or Alternative Carbon Sources
Biological denitrification is a generally economically viable and reliable technology for nitrate (NO3−-N) and nitrite (NO2−-N) removal from wastewater. Nitrate/nitrite reduction requires an electron donor, which can be supplied from influent wastewater organic compounds, added as an external carbon source, or by endogenous respiration. Decisions regarding the selection of an external carbon source should take into consideration its cost, sludge generation quantity, the rate and efficiency of denitrification, and chemical storage safety. The expense of waste management and external carbon sources accounts for up to 50% of the overall cost of wastewater treatment. The carbon source characteristics required for biological denitrification affect the microbial community structure, denitrification rate, and intermediate products. This review is based on a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review providing information and insight into the topic of the denitrification process using different carbon sources. In this review, the main focus was on discussing alternative carbon sources vs. traditional carbon sources in terms of the carbon source price, C/N ratio, denitrification efficiency and rate, operational parameters, and advantages and disadvantages, as well as the limitations in the denitrification process. Future perspectives may include the operating parameters influencing the stability of the removal performance; the maintenance and improvement of nitrate removal; a study of the diversity of the microbial community; research on the application of new alternative carbon sources in denitrification; and N2O emission detection and minimisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energies
Energies ENERGY & FUELS-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
21.90%
发文量
8045
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Energies (ISSN 1996-1073) is an open access journal of related scientific research, technology development and policy and management studies. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信