程序员的力量:从建模者的角度看荷兰水利部门水动力模型的自动化设置

Janneke O. E. Remmers, A. Teuling, Ruben Dahm, Arthur Van Dam, L. Melsen
{"title":"程序员的力量:从建模者的角度看荷兰水利部门水动力模型的自动化设置","authors":"Janneke O. E. Remmers, A. Teuling, Ruben Dahm, Arthur Van Dam, L. Melsen","doi":"10.18174/sesmo.18657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of models in decision making, for example in water management, requires confidence in the model and its outputs. Since choices in model setup affect model output, this confidence is affected by the modellers’ professional judgement. Computer programmers can use their expertise in coding to standardise some of the tasks associated with computational modelling. Therefore, centralized automation has the potential to ensure quality of modelling decisions. Since it is the modeller that makes the choices in the model set-up, it is important to understand how modellers perceive automation. To explore their perspectives, we conducted fourteen interviews with modellers at water authorities and consulting companies in the Netherlands. The transcripts were analysed through deductive and inductive content analysis. Our study reveals that automated modelling processes can improve efficiency, transparency and consistency, but only if certain requirements are met, such as good documentation, clear ownership, adequate maintenance, and frequent evaluation. Therefore, managing the risks and benefits of automation requires balancing the power between modellers and programmers.","PeriodicalId":166291,"journal":{"name":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling","volume":"55 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power to the programmer: Modeller’s perspective on automating the setup of hydrodynamic models for Dutch water authorities\",\"authors\":\"Janneke O. E. Remmers, A. Teuling, Ruben Dahm, Arthur Van Dam, L. Melsen\",\"doi\":\"10.18174/sesmo.18657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Use of models in decision making, for example in water management, requires confidence in the model and its outputs. Since choices in model setup affect model output, this confidence is affected by the modellers’ professional judgement. Computer programmers can use their expertise in coding to standardise some of the tasks associated with computational modelling. Therefore, centralized automation has the potential to ensure quality of modelling decisions. Since it is the modeller that makes the choices in the model set-up, it is important to understand how modellers perceive automation. To explore their perspectives, we conducted fourteen interviews with modellers at water authorities and consulting companies in the Netherlands. The transcripts were analysed through deductive and inductive content analysis. Our study reveals that automated modelling processes can improve efficiency, transparency and consistency, but only if certain requirements are met, such as good documentation, clear ownership, adequate maintenance, and frequent evaluation. Therefore, managing the risks and benefits of automation requires balancing the power between modellers and programmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling\",\"volume\":\"55 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.18657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18174/sesmo.18657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在决策中使用模型,例如在水资源管理中,需要对模型及其输出结果有信心。由于模型设置的选择会影响模型的输出结果,因此这种信心会受到建模者专业判断的影响。计算机程序员可以利用他们在编码方面的专业知识,将一些与计算建模相关的任务标准化。因此,集中自动化有可能确保建模决策的质量。由于是建模人员在模型设置中做出选择,因此了解建模人员如何看待自动化非常重要。为了探索他们的观点,我们对荷兰水利部门和咨询公司的建模人员进行了 14 次访谈。我们通过演绎和归纳内容分析对访谈记录进行了分析。我们的研究表明,自动化建模过程可以提高效率、透明度和一致性,但前提是必须满足某些要求,如良好的文档、明确的所有权、充分的维护和频繁的评估。因此,管理自动化的风险和收益需要平衡建模人员和程序员之间的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power to the programmer: Modeller’s perspective on automating the setup of hydrodynamic models for Dutch water authorities
Use of models in decision making, for example in water management, requires confidence in the model and its outputs. Since choices in model setup affect model output, this confidence is affected by the modellers’ professional judgement. Computer programmers can use their expertise in coding to standardise some of the tasks associated with computational modelling. Therefore, centralized automation has the potential to ensure quality of modelling decisions. Since it is the modeller that makes the choices in the model set-up, it is important to understand how modellers perceive automation. To explore their perspectives, we conducted fourteen interviews with modellers at water authorities and consulting companies in the Netherlands. The transcripts were analysed through deductive and inductive content analysis. Our study reveals that automated modelling processes can improve efficiency, transparency and consistency, but only if certain requirements are met, such as good documentation, clear ownership, adequate maintenance, and frequent evaluation. Therefore, managing the risks and benefits of automation requires balancing the power between modellers and programmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信