设计思维:进入概念的迷宫

Anastasia A. Kuzmina, E. E. Pavlovskaya
{"title":"设计思维:进入概念的迷宫","authors":"Anastasia A. Kuzmina, E. E. Pavlovskaya","doi":"10.47055/19904126_2024_2(86)_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a critical analysis of the most common approaches to defining the concept of «design thinking» in Russian-language publications: a creative rather than analytical method for solving any problems; focus on the interests of the end user, innovation development strategy. However, in the context of the growing popularity of the term «design thinking», it is being blurred and devalued, which negatively affects the attitude towards design itself: design thinking, positioned as a publicly accessible activity, leads to a simplified understanding of the essence of design activity, this methodology and, often, its amateurish use.","PeriodicalId":423958,"journal":{"name":"Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design thinking: in the labyrinth of the concept\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia A. Kuzmina, E. E. Pavlovskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.47055/19904126_2024_2(86)_18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents a critical analysis of the most common approaches to defining the concept of «design thinking» in Russian-language publications: a creative rather than analytical method for solving any problems; focus on the interests of the end user, innovation development strategy. However, in the context of the growing popularity of the term «design thinking», it is being blurred and devalued, which negatively affects the attitude towards design itself: design thinking, positioned as a publicly accessible activity, leads to a simplified understanding of the essence of design activity, this methodology and, often, its amateurish use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"1 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47055/19904126_2024_2(86)_18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47055/19904126_2024_2(86)_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章对俄语出版物中最常见的 "设计思维 "概念定义方法进行了批判性分析:解决任何问题的创造性而非分析性方法;关注最终用户的利益;创新发展战略。然而,在 "设计思维 "一词日益流行的背景下,它正被模糊化和贬值,这对人们对待设计本身的态度产生了负面影响:设计思维被定位为一种公众可以参与的活动,这导致人们对设计活动的本质、这一方法论的理解被简化,并经常被业余地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design thinking: in the labyrinth of the concept
The article presents a critical analysis of the most common approaches to defining the concept of «design thinking» in Russian-language publications: a creative rather than analytical method for solving any problems; focus on the interests of the end user, innovation development strategy. However, in the context of the growing popularity of the term «design thinking», it is being blurred and devalued, which negatively affects the attitude towards design itself: design thinking, positioned as a publicly accessible activity, leads to a simplified understanding of the essence of design activity, this methodology and, often, its amateurish use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信