COVID-19 对一家中西部四级城市学术卫生中心专业医护人员的影响。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jennifer A Sledge, Donna Prentice, Cassandra Arroyo
{"title":"COVID-19 对一家中西部四级城市学术卫生中心专业医护人员的影响。","authors":"Jennifer A Sledge, Donna Prentice, Cassandra Arroyo","doi":"10.1177/21650799241260604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior pandemic research has focused on physicians and nurses who provide direct patient care. Literature on the experiences of nonnurse/physician clinicians and nonclinical health care professionals is sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over threetime points to examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and nonclinical healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 464).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were no significant differences in distress across survey waves, except for anger (<i>p</i> = .046). No significant differences in distress scores were found between job types. Multiple linear regression results varied. Both the threat and interrupted plans scores were significant predictors of distress. Resources available to healthcare providers (HCPs) were underutilized in all three waves.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals' distress increases with exposure. Integrating self-care resources for staff may mitigate the impact and maintain a healthy work environment.</p><p><strong>Application to practice: </strong>Occupational health providers should incorporate these findings when developing opportunities to address the needs of health care professionals in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":48968,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Health & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Professionals at a Midwestern Quaternary Academic Urban Health Center.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A Sledge, Donna Prentice, Cassandra Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21650799241260604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior pandemic research has focused on physicians and nurses who provide direct patient care. Literature on the experiences of nonnurse/physician clinicians and nonclinical health care professionals is sparse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over threetime points to examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and nonclinical healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 464).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were no significant differences in distress across survey waves, except for anger (<i>p</i> = .046). No significant differences in distress scores were found between job types. Multiple linear regression results varied. Both the threat and interrupted plans scores were significant predictors of distress. Resources available to healthcare providers (HCPs) were underutilized in all three waves.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals' distress increases with exposure. Integrating self-care resources for staff may mitigate the impact and maintain a healthy work environment.</p><p><strong>Application to practice: </strong>Occupational health providers should incorporate these findings when developing opportunities to address the needs of health care professionals in the workplace.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workplace Health & Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workplace Health & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799241260604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799241260604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:之前的大流行病研究主要集中在直接为病人提供护理的医生和护士身上。有关非护士/医生的临床医生和非临床医护专业人员的经历的文献很少:方法: 我们在三个时间点开展了一项横断面观察研究,考察 COVID-19 对临床和非临床医护专业人员(n = 464)的影响:除愤怒(p = .046)外,不同调查波次的困扰没有明显差异。不同工作类型的医护人员的压力得分也无明显差异。多元线性回归结果各不相同。威胁和中断计划得分均可显著预测困扰。在所有三个波次中,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)可利用的资源均未得到充分利用:结论:医疗保健专业人员的困扰会随着暴露程度的增加而增加。为员工整合自我保健资源可减轻影响并保持健康的工作环境:对实践的应用:职业健康提供者在开发机会以满足医疗保健专业人员在工作场所的需求时,应纳入这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Professionals at a Midwestern Quaternary Academic Urban Health Center.

Background: Prior pandemic research has focused on physicians and nurses who provide direct patient care. Literature on the experiences of nonnurse/physician clinicians and nonclinical health care professionals is sparse.

Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over threetime points to examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical and nonclinical healthcare professionals (n = 464).

Findings: There were no significant differences in distress across survey waves, except for anger (p = .046). No significant differences in distress scores were found between job types. Multiple linear regression results varied. Both the threat and interrupted plans scores were significant predictors of distress. Resources available to healthcare providers (HCPs) were underutilized in all three waves.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals' distress increases with exposure. Integrating self-care resources for staff may mitigate the impact and maintain a healthy work environment.

Application to practice: Occupational health providers should incorporate these findings when developing opportunities to address the needs of health care professionals in the workplace.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Workplace Health & Safety: Promoting Environments Conducive to Well-Being and Productivity is the official publication of the American Association of Occupational Health Nursing, Inc. (AAOHN). It is a scientific peer-reviewed Journal. Its purpose is to support and promote the practice of occupational and environmental health nurses by providing leading edge research findings and evidence-based clinical practices. It publishes articles that span the range of issues facing occupational and environmental health professionals, including emergency and all-hazard preparedness, health promotion, safety, productivity, environmental health, case management, workers'' compensation, business and leadership, compliance and information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信