Eva Cooney, Elaine Toomey, Kathleen Ryan, Oonagh Meade, Jenny McSharry
{"title":"数字化有什么不同?一项定性访谈研究,探索将面对面的行为改变干预措施调整为数字交付的经验。","authors":"Eva Cooney, Elaine Toomey, Kathleen Ryan, Oonagh Meade, Jenny McSharry","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Digital health behaviour change interventions may be adapted from in-person interventions, without appropriate consideration of how the digital context might differ. Drawing on the wider literature on behaviour change intervention development, this research aims to explore the digital adaptation process of health behaviour change interventions and the specific considerations for digital modes of delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative interview study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Interviews with 15 intervention developers/facilitators were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight a continuum of digitalization, where variation in technology available and human support influences considerations for digital adaptation. ‘What vs how: “trying to do the impossible”’ describes the balance between retaining the intervention's active ingredients while modifying for digital delivery. Through ‘Trial and error’, participants described an iterative process based on experience of delivery. ‘Creating connection and engagement’ emphasizes the importance of social support and the challenges of replicating this.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Several considerations for digital adaptations are proposed including the involvement of end-users (facilitators and recipients) during adaptation, the need to understand the original intervention and new context for use, and the different motivational needs of digital intervention recipients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"29 4","pages":"972-999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12741","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What's different about digital? A qualitative interview study exploring experiences of adapting in-person behaviour change interventions for digital delivery\",\"authors\":\"Eva Cooney, Elaine Toomey, Kathleen Ryan, Oonagh Meade, Jenny McSharry\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Digital health behaviour change interventions may be adapted from in-person interventions, without appropriate consideration of how the digital context might differ. Drawing on the wider literature on behaviour change intervention development, this research aims to explore the digital adaptation process of health behaviour change interventions and the specific considerations for digital modes of delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative interview study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Interviews with 15 intervention developers/facilitators were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings highlight a continuum of digitalization, where variation in technology available and human support influences considerations for digital adaptation. ‘What vs how: “trying to do the impossible”’ describes the balance between retaining the intervention's active ingredients while modifying for digital delivery. Through ‘Trial and error’, participants described an iterative process based on experience of delivery. ‘Creating connection and engagement’ emphasizes the importance of social support and the challenges of replicating this.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Several considerations for digital adaptations are proposed including the involvement of end-users (facilitators and recipients) during adaptation, the need to understand the original intervention and new context for use, and the different motivational needs of digital intervention recipients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"972-999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12741\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
What's different about digital? A qualitative interview study exploring experiences of adapting in-person behaviour change interventions for digital delivery
Objectives
Digital health behaviour change interventions may be adapted from in-person interventions, without appropriate consideration of how the digital context might differ. Drawing on the wider literature on behaviour change intervention development, this research aims to explore the digital adaptation process of health behaviour change interventions and the specific considerations for digital modes of delivery.
Design
A qualitative interview study.
Methods
Interviews with 15 intervention developers/facilitators were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
Findings highlight a continuum of digitalization, where variation in technology available and human support influences considerations for digital adaptation. ‘What vs how: “trying to do the impossible”’ describes the balance between retaining the intervention's active ingredients while modifying for digital delivery. Through ‘Trial and error’, participants described an iterative process based on experience of delivery. ‘Creating connection and engagement’ emphasizes the importance of social support and the challenges of replicating this.
Conclusions
Several considerations for digital adaptations are proposed including the involvement of end-users (facilitators and recipients) during adaptation, the need to understand the original intervention and new context for use, and the different motivational needs of digital intervention recipients.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.