幼儿自闭症谱系障碍筛查:证据仍然不足。

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Bogdan Grigore, Jaime Peters, Jessica Williams, Ginny Russell, Paula Coles, Cristina Visintin, Morwenna Rogers, Robert Hayward, Zhivko Zhelev, Stuart Logan, Christopher Hyde
{"title":"幼儿自闭症谱系障碍筛查:证据仍然不足。","authors":"Bogdan Grigore, Jaime Peters, Jessica Williams, Ginny Russell, Paula Coles, Cristina Visintin, Morwenna Rogers, Robert Hayward, Zhivko Zhelev, Stuart Logan, Christopher Hyde","doi":"10.1177/21501319241263223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has the potential to significantly reduce the impact of the condition, however previous reviews have found little evidence to support screening programs for ASD in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review with the aim of updating evidence on 3 aspects: (a) diagnostic stability of ASD in young children; (b) accuracy of ASD screening tools in young children; and (c) the benefits of early interventions in screen-detected young children with ASD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 studies were included in our review. Five studies looking at diagnostic stability reported estimates ranging from 71.9% to 100%, however the majority only included a follow-up of 24 months and all studies raised concerns regarding the risk of bias due particularly to lack of blinding, sample size, and patient flow. A total of 25 studies, reported in 26 articles, were identified that reported accuracy data on 11 screening tools. Most of the reports were concerned with versions of M-CHAT, reporting sensitivity estimates from 0.67 to 1.0; however, many of these were deemed to be of high risk of bias due to lack of blinding and follow-up. Four studies reported on early interventions in screen-detected children; however, the majority did not find significant improvements on the relevant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the evidence on screening for ASD in young children captured by this review is not conclusive regarding the 3 aspects of screening in this population. Future studies should attempt to ensure blinded diagnostic assessments, include longer follow-up periods and limit attrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children: Still Not Enough Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Bogdan Grigore, Jaime Peters, Jessica Williams, Ginny Russell, Paula Coles, Cristina Visintin, Morwenna Rogers, Robert Hayward, Zhivko Zhelev, Stuart Logan, Christopher Hyde\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21501319241263223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has the potential to significantly reduce the impact of the condition, however previous reviews have found little evidence to support screening programs for ASD in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review with the aim of updating evidence on 3 aspects: (a) diagnostic stability of ASD in young children; (b) accuracy of ASD screening tools in young children; and (c) the benefits of early interventions in screen-detected young children with ASD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 studies were included in our review. Five studies looking at diagnostic stability reported estimates ranging from 71.9% to 100%, however the majority only included a follow-up of 24 months and all studies raised concerns regarding the risk of bias due particularly to lack of blinding, sample size, and patient flow. A total of 25 studies, reported in 26 articles, were identified that reported accuracy data on 11 screening tools. Most of the reports were concerned with versions of M-CHAT, reporting sensitivity estimates from 0.67 to 1.0; however, many of these were deemed to be of high risk of bias due to lack of blinding and follow-up. Four studies reported on early interventions in screen-detected children; however, the majority did not find significant improvements on the relevant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the evidence on screening for ASD in young children captured by this review is not conclusive regarding the 3 aspects of screening in this population. Future studies should attempt to ensure blinded diagnostic assessments, include longer follow-up periods and limit attrition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241263223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241263223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期发现自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)有可能大大降低该疾病的影响,但以往的综述发现,几乎没有证据支持幼儿自闭症谱系障碍筛查项目:我们进行了一项综述,旨在更新以下三个方面的证据:(a)幼儿自闭症诊断的稳定性;(b)幼儿自闭症筛查工具的准确性;以及(c)对筛查出的幼儿自闭症患者进行早期干预的益处:共有 33 项研究被纳入我们的综述。其中五项研究对诊断稳定性进行了评估,评估结果从71.9%到100%不等,但大多数研究的随访时间只有24个月,而且所有研究都因缺乏盲法、样本量和患者流等问题而引发了偏倚风险。在 26 篇文章中共发现了 25 项研究,报告了 11 种筛查工具的准确性数据。大多数报告涉及 M-CHAT 的版本,报告的灵敏度估计值从 0.67 到 1.0 不等;然而,由于缺乏盲法和随访,其中许多报告被认为具有较高的偏倚风险。四项研究报告了对筛查出的儿童进行早期干预的情况;然而,大多数研究并未发现相关结果有显著改善:总体而言,本综述所收集的有关幼儿 ASD 筛查的证据并未就筛查该人群的 3 个方面得出结论。未来的研究应努力确保盲法诊断评估,包括更长的随访期和限制自然减员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children: Still Not Enough Evidence.

Background: Early detection of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has the potential to significantly reduce the impact of the condition, however previous reviews have found little evidence to support screening programs for ASD in young children.

Methods: We conducted a review with the aim of updating evidence on 3 aspects: (a) diagnostic stability of ASD in young children; (b) accuracy of ASD screening tools in young children; and (c) the benefits of early interventions in screen-detected young children with ASD.

Results: A total of 33 studies were included in our review. Five studies looking at diagnostic stability reported estimates ranging from 71.9% to 100%, however the majority only included a follow-up of 24 months and all studies raised concerns regarding the risk of bias due particularly to lack of blinding, sample size, and patient flow. A total of 25 studies, reported in 26 articles, were identified that reported accuracy data on 11 screening tools. Most of the reports were concerned with versions of M-CHAT, reporting sensitivity estimates from 0.67 to 1.0; however, many of these were deemed to be of high risk of bias due to lack of blinding and follow-up. Four studies reported on early interventions in screen-detected children; however, the majority did not find significant improvements on the relevant outcomes.

Conclusions: Overall, the evidence on screening for ASD in young children captured by this review is not conclusive regarding the 3 aspects of screening in this population. Future studies should attempt to ensure blinded diagnostic assessments, include longer follow-up periods and limit attrition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信