区分放疗后浆液性样子宫内膜病变(PoRSEC)和浆液性子宫内膜上皮内癌(SEIC)的形态学和免疫组化评估。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Damiano Arciuolo, Giulia Scaglione, Antonio Travaglino, Nicoletta D'Alessandris, Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Belen Padial Urtueta, Stefania Sfregola, Antonio Raffone, Caterina Fulgione, Michele Valente, Roberta Benvenuto, Federica Cianfrini, Gian Franco Zannoni
{"title":"区分放疗后浆液性样子宫内膜病变(PoRSEC)和浆液性子宫内膜上皮内癌(SEIC)的形态学和免疫组化评估。","authors":"Damiano Arciuolo, Giulia Scaglione, Antonio Travaglino, Nicoletta D'Alessandris, Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Belen Padial Urtueta, Stefania Sfregola, Antonio Raffone, Caterina Fulgione, Michele Valente, Roberta Benvenuto, Federica Cianfrini, Gian Franco Zannoni","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03818-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uteri from women undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may show reactive atypia which may mimic serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC). We aimed to assess the prevalence and morphological/immunohistochemical features of post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial changes (PoRSEC) in women undergone CRT for locally advanced cervical cancer, with a focus on the differential diagnosis with SEIC. Consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergone CRT between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Endometrial histological specimens were assessed for the presence of PoRSEC. Twenty-two cases of SEIC were included for comparison. Immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki67 was performed. Out of 244 reviewed patients, 36 (14.7%) showed PoRSEC. The degree of nuclear atypia was similar between PoRSECs and SEIC. However, a papillary architecture with areas of confluent papillae was only observed in SEIC. SEIC cases showed a high mitotic activity as opposed to PoRSEC cases. The expression of p53 was aberrant in all SEICs but in none of the PoRSECs; however, 13/36 PoRSECs showed p53 positivity in most tumor cells, potentially mimicking a mutation pattern. A block-type p16 expression was observed in all SEICs and in 16/36 PoRSECs. Mean Ki67 expression was 26.9% in SEIC (range 5-70%) and 8.16% in PoRSEC (range 5-35%). While SEIC showed sharp morphological and immunohistochemical demarcation, PoRSEC were more heterogenous and merged imperceptibly with normal endometrium. In conclusion, PoRSEC may mimic SEIC both morphologically and immunohistochemically. However, a papillary architecture with cytological demarcation is typically observed in SEIC but not in PoRSEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation in distinguishing post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial change (PoRSEC) and serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC).\",\"authors\":\"Damiano Arciuolo, Giulia Scaglione, Antonio Travaglino, Nicoletta D'Alessandris, Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Belen Padial Urtueta, Stefania Sfregola, Antonio Raffone, Caterina Fulgione, Michele Valente, Roberta Benvenuto, Federica Cianfrini, Gian Franco Zannoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03818-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Uteri from women undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may show reactive atypia which may mimic serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC). We aimed to assess the prevalence and morphological/immunohistochemical features of post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial changes (PoRSEC) in women undergone CRT for locally advanced cervical cancer, with a focus on the differential diagnosis with SEIC. Consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergone CRT between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Endometrial histological specimens were assessed for the presence of PoRSEC. Twenty-two cases of SEIC were included for comparison. Immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki67 was performed. Out of 244 reviewed patients, 36 (14.7%) showed PoRSEC. The degree of nuclear atypia was similar between PoRSECs and SEIC. However, a papillary architecture with areas of confluent papillae was only observed in SEIC. SEIC cases showed a high mitotic activity as opposed to PoRSEC cases. The expression of p53 was aberrant in all SEICs but in none of the PoRSECs; however, 13/36 PoRSECs showed p53 positivity in most tumor cells, potentially mimicking a mutation pattern. A block-type p16 expression was observed in all SEICs and in 16/36 PoRSECs. Mean Ki67 expression was 26.9% in SEIC (range 5-70%) and 8.16% in PoRSEC (range 5-35%). While SEIC showed sharp morphological and immunohistochemical demarcation, PoRSEC were more heterogenous and merged imperceptibly with normal endometrium. In conclusion, PoRSEC may mimic SEIC both morphologically and immunohistochemically. However, a papillary architecture with cytological demarcation is typically observed in SEIC but not in PoRSEC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03818-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03818-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受放化疗(CRT)的妇女的子宫可能会出现反应性不典型性,这可能会模仿浆液性子宫内膜上皮内瘤(SEIC)。我们的目的是评估因局部晚期宫颈癌接受 CRT 治疗的妇女中放疗后浆液性子宫内膜样病变(PoRSEC)的发生率和形态学/免疫组化特征,重点是与 SEIC 的鉴别诊断。研究人员回顾了2011年至2018年间接受CRT治疗的连续性局部晚期宫颈癌患者。对子宫内膜组织学标本进行了评估,以确定是否存在 PoRSEC。纳入22例SEIC进行比较。对 p53、p16 和 Ki67 进行了免疫组化。在 244 例接受复查的患者中,有 36 例(14.7%)出现 PoRSEC。PoRSEC和SEIC的核不典型程度相似。然而,只有在 SEIC 中才能观察到乳头状结构,其中包括汇合乳头区域。与 PoRSEC 病例相比,SEIC 病例的有丝分裂活性较高。p53在所有SEIC中都有异常表达,但在PoRSEC中却没有;不过,13/36的PoRSEC在大多数肿瘤细胞中都显示出p53阳性,这有可能是一种突变模式。在所有 SEIC 和 16/36 PoRSEC 中都观察到了阻滞型 p16 表达。SEIC的平均Ki67表达为26.9%(范围为5-70%),PoRSEC的平均Ki67表达为8.16%(范围为5-35%)。SEIC在形态学和免疫组化上有明显的分界,而PoRSEC则更为异质,与正常子宫内膜的融合不易察觉。总之,PoRSEC可能在形态学和免疫组化上与SEIC相似。然而,在 SEIC 中通常可观察到具有细胞学分界的乳头状结构,而在 PoRSEC 中却无法观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation in distinguishing post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial change (PoRSEC) and serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC).

Morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation in distinguishing post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial change (PoRSEC) and serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC).

Uteri from women undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may show reactive atypia which may mimic serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC). We aimed to assess the prevalence and morphological/immunohistochemical features of post-radiotherapy serous-like endometrial changes (PoRSEC) in women undergone CRT for locally advanced cervical cancer, with a focus on the differential diagnosis with SEIC. Consecutive patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergone CRT between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Endometrial histological specimens were assessed for the presence of PoRSEC. Twenty-two cases of SEIC were included for comparison. Immunohistochemistry for p53, p16, and Ki67 was performed. Out of 244 reviewed patients, 36 (14.7%) showed PoRSEC. The degree of nuclear atypia was similar between PoRSECs and SEIC. However, a papillary architecture with areas of confluent papillae was only observed in SEIC. SEIC cases showed a high mitotic activity as opposed to PoRSEC cases. The expression of p53 was aberrant in all SEICs but in none of the PoRSECs; however, 13/36 PoRSECs showed p53 positivity in most tumor cells, potentially mimicking a mutation pattern. A block-type p16 expression was observed in all SEICs and in 16/36 PoRSECs. Mean Ki67 expression was 26.9% in SEIC (range 5-70%) and 8.16% in PoRSEC (range 5-35%). While SEIC showed sharp morphological and immunohistochemical demarcation, PoRSEC were more heterogenous and merged imperceptibly with normal endometrium. In conclusion, PoRSEC may mimic SEIC both morphologically and immunohistochemically. However, a papillary architecture with cytological demarcation is typically observed in SEIC but not in PoRSEC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信