使用加压定量吸入器和干粉吸入器的哮喘患者的人口统计学特征和与哮喘相关的特征。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Kurtuluş Aksu, Gürgün Tuğçe Vural Solak, Levent Cem Mutlu, Pınar Mutlu, Görkem Vayısoğlu Şahin, Ezgi Erdem Türe, Burcu Yormaz, Aylin Çapraz, Ayşe Coşkun Beyan, Yavuzalp Solak, Funda Aksu
{"title":"使用加压定量吸入器和干粉吸入器的哮喘患者的人口统计学特征和与哮喘相关的特征。","authors":"Kurtuluş Aksu, Gürgün Tuğçe Vural Solak, Levent Cem Mutlu, Pınar Mutlu, Görkem Vayısoğlu Şahin, Ezgi Erdem Türe, Burcu Yormaz, Aylin Çapraz, Ayşe Coşkun Beyan, Yavuzalp Solak, Funda Aksu","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Asthma controller medications can be delivered via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of exacerbations and satisfaction rate with device use in asthmatics using pMDIs or DPIs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in adults who used pMDIs or DPIs with correct inhaler technique and good adherence for asthma treatment. Demographic and asthma-related characteristics of the subjects and data regarding device satisfaction were collected through a face-to-face interview in the outpatient clinic. Rates of pMDI and DPI users and the data were compared between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included 338 patients (mean age: 48.6 ± 14.5 years, 253 [74.9%] women). Among participants, 96 (28.4%) were using pMDI and 242 (71.6%) were using DPI. The age of patients using pMDI were significantly lower compared with DPI users. No significant difference was observed in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma between pMDI and DPI users with good inhaler technique and good adherence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> More asthmatics use DPIs, however, pMDIs are used in younger asthmatic patients. No significant difference in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma was observed between pMDI and DPI users.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demographic and Asthma-Related Characteristics of Asthmatics Using Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers and Dry Powder Inhalers.\",\"authors\":\"Kurtuluş Aksu, Gürgün Tuğçe Vural Solak, Levent Cem Mutlu, Pınar Mutlu, Görkem Vayısoğlu Şahin, Ezgi Erdem Türe, Burcu Yormaz, Aylin Çapraz, Ayşe Coşkun Beyan, Yavuzalp Solak, Funda Aksu\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jamp.2024.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Asthma controller medications can be delivered via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of exacerbations and satisfaction rate with device use in asthmatics using pMDIs or DPIs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in adults who used pMDIs or DPIs with correct inhaler technique and good adherence for asthma treatment. Demographic and asthma-related characteristics of the subjects and data regarding device satisfaction were collected through a face-to-face interview in the outpatient clinic. Rates of pMDI and DPI users and the data were compared between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included 338 patients (mean age: 48.6 ± 14.5 years, 253 [74.9%] women). Among participants, 96 (28.4%) were using pMDI and 242 (71.6%) were using DPI. The age of patients using pMDI were significantly lower compared with DPI users. No significant difference was observed in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma between pMDI and DPI users with good inhaler technique and good adherence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> More asthmatics use DPIs, however, pMDIs are used in younger asthmatic patients. No significant difference in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma was observed between pMDI and DPI users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:哮喘控制药物可通过加压定量吸入器(pMDI)或干粉吸入器(DPI)装置提供。研究目的本研究旨在评估使用加压计量吸入器或干粉吸入器的哮喘患者病情加重的频率以及对设备使用的满意度。方法: 一项多中心横断面研究:在使用 pMDIs 或 DPIs 的成人中开展了一项多中心横断面研究,这些成人使用正确的吸入器技术和良好的依从性进行哮喘治疗。通过在门诊进行面对面访谈,收集了受试者的人口统计学特征、哮喘相关特征以及对设备的满意度数据。对两组 pMDI 和 DPI 使用者的比率和数据进行了比较。研究结果该研究包括 338 名患者(平均年龄:48.6 ± 14.5 岁,253 名女性[74.9%])。其中,96 人(28.4%)使用 pMDI,242 人(71.6%)使用 DPI。与使用干粉吸入器的患者相比,使用 pMDI 的患者年龄明显较低。在设备满意度和哮喘临床结果方面,使用 pMDI 和使用干粉吸入器的患者没有明显差异。结论更多的哮喘患者使用干粉吸入器,但 pMDIs 主要用于年轻的哮喘患者。在设备满意度和哮喘的临床治疗效果方面,pMDI 和 DPI 用户之间没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demographic and Asthma-Related Characteristics of Asthmatics Using Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers and Dry Powder Inhalers.

Background: Asthma controller medications can be delivered via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of exacerbations and satisfaction rate with device use in asthmatics using pMDIs or DPIs. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in adults who used pMDIs or DPIs with correct inhaler technique and good adherence for asthma treatment. Demographic and asthma-related characteristics of the subjects and data regarding device satisfaction were collected through a face-to-face interview in the outpatient clinic. Rates of pMDI and DPI users and the data were compared between the two groups. Results: The study included 338 patients (mean age: 48.6 ± 14.5 years, 253 [74.9%] women). Among participants, 96 (28.4%) were using pMDI and 242 (71.6%) were using DPI. The age of patients using pMDI were significantly lower compared with DPI users. No significant difference was observed in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma between pMDI and DPI users with good inhaler technique and good adherence. Conclusion: More asthmatics use DPIs, however, pMDIs are used in younger asthmatic patients. No significant difference in terms of device satisfaction and clinical outcomes of asthma was observed between pMDI and DPI users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信