在一家三甲医院的门诊环境中开展药物使用调查,以确定重要的药物相互作用并评估其临床重要性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Indian Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_483_23
Koustuv Chowdhury, Avijit Hazra, Soumitra Ghosh, Shouvik Choudhury
{"title":"在一家三甲医院的门诊环境中开展药物使用调查,以确定重要的药物相互作用并评估其临床重要性。","authors":"Koustuv Chowdhury, Avijit Hazra, Soumitra Ghosh, Shouvik Choudhury","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_483_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a common problem in pharmacotherapy, particularly in situations where multiple disorders must be treated at the same time. We conducted a drug use survey in the general medicine outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital with the objective of assessing the potential for DDI in individual prescriptions for adult patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Drugs prescribed in the current physician-patient encounter were considered in conjunction with medicines already being received by the patient as well as those discontinued in the past 1 month. Free online DDI checkers (available at https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html and https://reference.medscape.com/) were used to identify potential DDI and categorize them into mild, moderate, and severe categories. We did not consider food, alcohol, or smoking-related interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 prescriptions, having two or more drugs, were collected, and they accounted for 1052 prescribed drugs. Among them, 613 (58.27%) were prescribed in index visits, and the rest 438 (41.63%) were preexisting medication. The number of drugs prescribed in index visits ranged from 1 to 9 (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 4.0 ± 1.86; median 4). Potential DDIs were identified in 103 (67.32%) instances. The total number of interactions identified was 412. Of these, 19.66% had minor, 77.67% moderate, and 7.19% major clinical implications. Potential DDI count in each prescription was found from 0 to 13 in number (mean ± SD 2.7 ± 3.12; median 2.0). This number correlated strongly with the number of drugs being received by individual subjects (Rho 0.744; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential DDIs are a reality in day to day prescribing practice. Substantial proportion of these DDIs may have significant clinical implications. Prescribers need to be sensitized to this issue. Combining human expertise with technological solutions such as automated drug interaction alerts can help rectify the situation. Similar surveys are needed on a periodic basis to improve medication safety for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13490,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug use survey to identify significant drug-drug interactions and assess clinical importance in the outpatient setting of a tertiary care hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Koustuv Chowdhury, Avijit Hazra, Soumitra Ghosh, Shouvik Choudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijp.ijp_483_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a common problem in pharmacotherapy, particularly in situations where multiple disorders must be treated at the same time. We conducted a drug use survey in the general medicine outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital with the objective of assessing the potential for DDI in individual prescriptions for adult patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Drugs prescribed in the current physician-patient encounter were considered in conjunction with medicines already being received by the patient as well as those discontinued in the past 1 month. Free online DDI checkers (available at https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html and https://reference.medscape.com/) were used to identify potential DDI and categorize them into mild, moderate, and severe categories. We did not consider food, alcohol, or smoking-related interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 prescriptions, having two or more drugs, were collected, and they accounted for 1052 prescribed drugs. Among them, 613 (58.27%) were prescribed in index visits, and the rest 438 (41.63%) were preexisting medication. The number of drugs prescribed in index visits ranged from 1 to 9 (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 4.0 ± 1.86; median 4). Potential DDIs were identified in 103 (67.32%) instances. The total number of interactions identified was 412. Of these, 19.66% had minor, 77.67% moderate, and 7.19% major clinical implications. Potential DDI count in each prescription was found from 0 to 13 in number (mean ± SD 2.7 ± 3.12; median 2.0). This number correlated strongly with the number of drugs being received by individual subjects (Rho 0.744; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential DDIs are a reality in day to day prescribing practice. Substantial proportion of these DDIs may have significant clinical implications. Prescribers need to be sensitized to this issue. Combining human expertise with technological solutions such as automated drug interaction alerts can help rectify the situation. Similar surveys are needed on a periodic basis to improve medication safety for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_483_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_483_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:药物相互作用(DDI)是药物治疗中的一个常见问题,尤其是在必须同时治疗多种疾病的情况下。我们在一家三甲医院的全科门诊部进行了一次用药调查,目的是评估成人患者个人处方中 DDI 的可能性:本次医患会面中开具的处方药与患者已服用的药物以及过去 1 个月内停用的药物一并考虑。我们使用免费的在线 DDI 检查器(可在 https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html 和 https://reference.medscape.com/ 上获取)来识别潜在的 DDI 并将其分为轻度、中度和重度类别。我们没有考虑与食物、酒精或吸烟有关的相互作用:共收集了 153 份处方,其中包含两种或两种以上药物,处方药物总数为 1052 种。其中,613 张处方(58.27%)是在指标就诊时开具的,其余 438 张处方(41.63%)为就诊前已有的药物。指标就诊处方药的数量从 1 种到 9 种不等(平均值 ± 标准差 [SD] 4.0 ± 1.86;中位数 4)。在 103 例(67.32%)中发现了潜在的 DDI。确定的相互作用总数为 412 例。其中,19.66% 有轻微临床影响,77.67% 有中度临床影响,7.19% 有重大临床影响。每张处方中潜在的 DDI 数量从 0 到 13 不等(平均值 ± SD 2.7 ± 3.12;中位数 2.0)。这一数字与受试者接受的药物数量密切相关(Rho 0.744;P < 0.001):潜在的 DDIs 是日常处方实践中的现实问题。结论:潜在的 DDIs 是日常处方实践中的现实问题,其中相当一部分 DDIs 可能会对临床产生重大影响。需要提高处方者对这一问题的认识。将人类专业知识与自动药物相互作用警报等技术解决方案相结合,有助于纠正这种情况。需要定期进行类似调查,以提高患者的用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug use survey to identify significant drug-drug interactions and assess clinical importance in the outpatient setting of a tertiary care hospital.

Objectives: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a common problem in pharmacotherapy, particularly in situations where multiple disorders must be treated at the same time. We conducted a drug use survey in the general medicine outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital with the objective of assessing the potential for DDI in individual prescriptions for adult patients.

Materials and methods: Drugs prescribed in the current physician-patient encounter were considered in conjunction with medicines already being received by the patient as well as those discontinued in the past 1 month. Free online DDI checkers (available at https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html and https://reference.medscape.com/) were used to identify potential DDI and categorize them into mild, moderate, and severe categories. We did not consider food, alcohol, or smoking-related interactions.

Results: A total of 153 prescriptions, having two or more drugs, were collected, and they accounted for 1052 prescribed drugs. Among them, 613 (58.27%) were prescribed in index visits, and the rest 438 (41.63%) were preexisting medication. The number of drugs prescribed in index visits ranged from 1 to 9 (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 4.0 ± 1.86; median 4). Potential DDIs were identified in 103 (67.32%) instances. The total number of interactions identified was 412. Of these, 19.66% had minor, 77.67% moderate, and 7.19% major clinical implications. Potential DDI count in each prescription was found from 0 to 13 in number (mean ± SD 2.7 ± 3.12; median 2.0). This number correlated strongly with the number of drugs being received by individual subjects (Rho 0.744; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Potential DDIs are a reality in day to day prescribing practice. Substantial proportion of these DDIs may have significant clinical implications. Prescribers need to be sensitized to this issue. Combining human expertise with technological solutions such as automated drug interaction alerts can help rectify the situation. Similar surveys are needed on a periodic basis to improve medication safety for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信