估算静脉体外膜氧合状态下的心输出量:热稀释法与三维超声心动图的比较。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283
Katharina Linden, Mathias Schmandt, Thomas Muders, Nils Theuerkauf, Jens-Christian Schewe, Ulrike Herberg, Christian Putensen, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Stefan Kreyer
{"title":"估算静脉体外膜氧合状态下的心输出量:热稀释法与三维超声心动图的比较。","authors":"Katharina Linden, Mathias Schmandt, Thomas Muders, Nils Theuerkauf, Jens-Christian Schewe, Ulrike Herberg, Christian Putensen, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Stefan Kreyer","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Linden, Mathias Schmandt, Thomas Muders, Nils Theuerkauf, Jens-Christian Schewe, Ulrike Herberg, Christian Putensen, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Stefan Kreyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"75-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定心输出量(CO)的热稀释方法可能会受到静脉体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的影响。我们比较了使用肺动脉导管的肺动脉热稀释法(COPAC)、经肺热稀释法(COTPTD)和三维超声心动图(3DEcho)(CO3DEcho)对 18 名接受静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合患者的 CO 估计值。CO3DEcho 与 COPAC 和 COTPTD 之间的比较采用相关统计和 Bland-Altman 分析法进行。ECMO 支持下的血流量为 4.3 至 5.8 升/分钟(中位数为 4.9 升/分钟)。三维超声心动图测量的心输出量为 5.2 升/分钟(3.8/5.9),COPAC 为 7.3 升/分钟(5.9/7.9),COTPTD 为 7.3 升/分钟(6/8.2)(中位数[25%/75% 百分位数])。CO3DEcho 和 COPAC 的 Bland-Altman 分析显示平均偏差为-2.06 升/分钟,一致性范围为-4.16 至 0.04 升/分钟。CO3DEcho 和 COTPTD 的 Bland-Altman 分析显示平均偏差为-2.22 升/分钟,一致性范围为-4.18 至-0.25 升/分钟。我们发现 CO3DEcho 和 COPAC/COTPTD 之间的平均偏差为负值,一致性极限为负值。我们得出结论,在 ECMO 下通过热稀释估计 CO 会受到影响,这很可能是由于指标丢失导致 CO 被高估。临床医生在 ECMO 下监测基于热稀释的 CO 时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography.

Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信