Katharina Linden, Mathias Schmandt, Thomas Muders, Nils Theuerkauf, Jens-Christian Schewe, Ulrike Herberg, Christian Putensen, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Stefan Kreyer
{"title":"估算静脉体外膜氧合状态下的心输出量:热稀释法与三维超声心动图的比较。","authors":"Katharina Linden, Mathias Schmandt, Thomas Muders, Nils Theuerkauf, Jens-Christian Schewe, Ulrike Herberg, Christian Putensen, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Stefan Kreyer","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Linden, Mathias Schmandt, Thomas Muders, Nils Theuerkauf, Jens-Christian Schewe, Ulrike Herberg, Christian Putensen, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Stefan Kreyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"75-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography.
Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (CO PAC ), transpulmonary thermodilution (CO TPTD ), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO 3DEcho ) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC , and CO TPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), CO PAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and CO TPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO PAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO 3DEcho and CO TPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO 3DEcho and CO PAC /CO TPTD . We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.