为预测高龄产妇产后剖宫产建立风险评分:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Daniel Gabbai, Itamar Gilboa, Yael Reichman, Lee Reicher, Sharon Maslovitz, Anat Lavie, Yariv Yogev, Emmanuel Attali
{"title":"为预测高龄产妇产后剖宫产建立风险评分:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Daniel Gabbai,&nbsp;Itamar Gilboa,&nbsp;Yael Reichman,&nbsp;Lee Reicher,&nbsp;Sharon Maslovitz,&nbsp;Anat Lavie,&nbsp;Yariv Yogev,&nbsp;Emmanuel Attali","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine risk factors and to develop a risk prediction score for intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) in women over 40 years old.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study, in a single university-affiliated tertiary medical center. All women aged 40 years or more who planned a trial of labor between 2012 and 2022. Women who opted for an elective CD and those with non-viable fetuses were excluded. Maternal and neonatal characteristics of women who delivered vaginally were compared to those who underwent an intrapartum CD. Risk factors were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. A score was developed to predict the need for intrapartum CD. We assessed a receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the performance of our model.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measure</h3><p>An unplanned intrapartum cesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 122,583 women delivered at our center, of whom 6122 (4.9 %) aged 40 years or more attempted a trial of labor. Of them, 428 (7 %) underwent intrapartum CD. Several independent risk factors were identified, including nulliparity, regional anesthesia, induction of labor, use of antibiotics during labor, multiple gestation, previous cesarean delivery, and the presence of gestational diabetes or preeclampsia. A risk score model, employing a cut-off of 7, demonstrated successful prediction of intrapartum CD, with an area under the curve of 0.86.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The score model for intrapartum CD can be used by caregivers to offer a more informed consultation to women aged 40 years or more deciding on the mode of delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a risk score for prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery among older women: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Gabbai,&nbsp;Itamar Gilboa,&nbsp;Yael Reichman,&nbsp;Lee Reicher,&nbsp;Sharon Maslovitz,&nbsp;Anat Lavie,&nbsp;Yariv Yogev,&nbsp;Emmanuel Attali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine risk factors and to develop a risk prediction score for intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) in women over 40 years old.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study, in a single university-affiliated tertiary medical center. All women aged 40 years or more who planned a trial of labor between 2012 and 2022. Women who opted for an elective CD and those with non-viable fetuses were excluded. Maternal and neonatal characteristics of women who delivered vaginally were compared to those who underwent an intrapartum CD. Risk factors were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. A score was developed to predict the need for intrapartum CD. We assessed a receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the performance of our model.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measure</h3><p>An unplanned intrapartum cesarean section.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 122,583 women delivered at our center, of whom 6122 (4.9 %) aged 40 years or more attempted a trial of labor. Of them, 428 (7 %) underwent intrapartum CD. Several independent risk factors were identified, including nulliparity, regional anesthesia, induction of labor, use of antibiotics during labor, multiple gestation, previous cesarean delivery, and the presence of gestational diabetes or preeclampsia. A risk score model, employing a cut-off of 7, demonstrated successful prediction of intrapartum CD, with an area under the curve of 0.86.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The score model for intrapartum CD can be used by caregivers to offer a more informed consultation to women aged 40 years or more deciding on the mode of delivery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224001671\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512224001671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定 40 岁以上产妇产前剖宫产(CD)的风险因素并制定风险预测评分:研究设计:研究设计:在一所大学附属三级医疗中心进行的回顾性队列研究。所有在 2012 年至 2022 年期间计划试产的 40 岁或以上女性。选择选择性剖宫产的产妇和胎儿无法存活的产妇除外。将经阴道分娩的产妇和新生儿特征与接受产中剖宫产的产妇进行比较。采用单变量和多变量分析对风险因素进行了研究。为预测是否需要产前诊断制定了一个评分标准。我们评估了接收者操作特征曲线,以评价模型的性能:结果:研究期间,122583 名产妇在本中心分娩,其中 6122 人(4.9%)年龄在 40 岁或 40 岁以上,试图试产。其中,428 人(7%)接受了产中剖宫产。研究发现了几个独立的风险因素,包括非妊娠、区域麻醉、引产、分娩过程中使用抗生素、多胎妊娠、既往剖宫产以及妊娠糖尿病或子痫前期。以 7 为临界值的风险评分模型成功地预测了产后 CD,其曲线下面积为 0.86:护理人员可利用产后出血风险评分模型为 40 岁或以上决定分娩方式的产妇提供更明智的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a risk score for prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery among older women: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

To determine risk factors and to develop a risk prediction score for intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) in women over 40 years old.

Study design

A retrospective cohort study, in a single university-affiliated tertiary medical center. All women aged 40 years or more who planned a trial of labor between 2012 and 2022. Women who opted for an elective CD and those with non-viable fetuses were excluded. Maternal and neonatal characteristics of women who delivered vaginally were compared to those who underwent an intrapartum CD. Risk factors were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. A score was developed to predict the need for intrapartum CD. We assessed a receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the performance of our model.

Main outcome measure

An unplanned intrapartum cesarean section.

Results

During the study period, 122,583 women delivered at our center, of whom 6122 (4.9 %) aged 40 years or more attempted a trial of labor. Of them, 428 (7 %) underwent intrapartum CD. Several independent risk factors were identified, including nulliparity, regional anesthesia, induction of labor, use of antibiotics during labor, multiple gestation, previous cesarean delivery, and the presence of gestational diabetes or preeclampsia. A risk score model, employing a cut-off of 7, demonstrated successful prediction of intrapartum CD, with an area under the curve of 0.86.

Conclusion

The score model for intrapartum CD can be used by caregivers to offer a more informed consultation to women aged 40 years or more deciding on the mode of delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信