重度上睑下垂或眼睑张开障碍成人的额肌瓣重睑术。

Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1080/01676830.2024.2381240
Jane Z Spadaro, Nikita Patel, Alon Kahana
{"title":"重度上睑下垂或眼睑张开障碍成人的额肌瓣重睑术。","authors":"Jane Z Spadaro, Nikita Patel, Alon Kahana","doi":"10.1080/01676830.2024.2381240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessment of the frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation surgical technique for adults with severe ptosis and apraxia of eyelid opening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series of 30 eyes with severe ptosis or apraxia of eyelid opening. Outcomes were assessed for margin to reflex distance 1 (MRD1), lagophthalmos, complications, and need for subsequent surgical intervention. A paired t-test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores of a quality-of-life questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty eyes of 19 patients underwent surgery, 16 (53%) with combined frontalis + levator-Muller muscle flap and 14 (46%) with frontalis muscle flap alone. There were 14 female and 5 male patients, with an average age of 55 years (range, 18-76). Mean preoperative MRD1 was -0.6 mm (range, -5 to 2) with mean levator excursion of 7.1 mm. Seventeen eyes had a myogenic etiology, five had a paralytic etiology, six had blepharospasm with apraxia of lid opening, and two had a neurodegenerative etiology. Nineteen eyes (63%) had previously undergone ptosis repair. Mean postoperative MRD1 was 2.5 mm (range, 0.5 to 5) at mean follow-up of 63.3 days. There were no serious surgical complications; minor complications included ocular surface keratopathy and one patient who required surgical revision. Results of the QOL questionnaire indicated significant improvement in vision-related symptoms postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation technique, with or without a levator-Muller retractor muscle flap, was very effective in this case series and provided good upper eyelid position with acceptable corneal protection and high patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation technique in adults with severe ptosis or apraxia of eyelid opening.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Z Spadaro, Nikita Patel, Alon Kahana\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01676830.2024.2381240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assessment of the frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation surgical technique for adults with severe ptosis and apraxia of eyelid opening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series of 30 eyes with severe ptosis or apraxia of eyelid opening. Outcomes were assessed for margin to reflex distance 1 (MRD1), lagophthalmos, complications, and need for subsequent surgical intervention. A paired t-test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores of a quality-of-life questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty eyes of 19 patients underwent surgery, 16 (53%) with combined frontalis + levator-Muller muscle flap and 14 (46%) with frontalis muscle flap alone. There were 14 female and 5 male patients, with an average age of 55 years (range, 18-76). Mean preoperative MRD1 was -0.6 mm (range, -5 to 2) with mean levator excursion of 7.1 mm. Seventeen eyes had a myogenic etiology, five had a paralytic etiology, six had blepharospasm with apraxia of lid opening, and two had a neurodegenerative etiology. Nineteen eyes (63%) had previously undergone ptosis repair. Mean postoperative MRD1 was 2.5 mm (range, 0.5 to 5) at mean follow-up of 63.3 days. There were no serious surgical complications; minor complications included ocular surface keratopathy and one patient who required surgical revision. Results of the QOL questionnaire indicated significant improvement in vision-related symptoms postoperatively (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation technique, with or without a levator-Muller retractor muscle flap, was very effective in this case series and provided good upper eyelid position with acceptable corneal protection and high patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2381240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2381240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估额肌瓣重睑术对重度上睑下垂和睁眼障碍成人的治疗效果:方法:对 30 例重度上睑下垂或眼睑张开障碍患者进行回顾性病例系列研究。方法:对 30 例重度上睑下垂或睁眼障碍患者进行回顾性病例系列研究,评估结果包括反射距离 1(MRD1)、眼睑下垂、并发症以及后续手术干预的需要。采用配对t检验比较术前和术后生活质量问卷的得分:19名患者的30只眼睛接受了手术,其中16只(53%)采用额肌+提上睑肌-穆勒肌联合皮瓣,14只(46%)仅采用额肌皮瓣。其中女性患者 14 人,男性患者 5 人,平均年龄 55 岁(18-76 岁)。术前MRD1的平均值为-0.6毫米(范围为-5至2),上睑下垂的平均值为7.1毫米。17只眼睛的病因是肌源性,5只眼睛的病因是麻痹性,6只眼睛的病因是眼睑痉挛伴有睁眼障碍,2只眼睛的病因是神经变性。19只眼睛(63%)曾接受过上睑下垂修复手术。术后平均随访63.3天,平均MRD1为2.5毫米(范围为0.5至5)。没有严重的手术并发症;轻微并发症包括眼表角膜病变和一名需要手术复查的患者。QOL 问卷调查结果显示,术后视力相关症状明显改善(p = 0.02):结论:在本系列病例中,无论是否使用提上睑肌-穆勒牵开肌肌瓣,额肌瓣重睑术都非常有效,能提供良好的上睑位置和可接受的角膜保护,患者满意度很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation technique in adults with severe ptosis or apraxia of eyelid opening.

Purpose: Assessment of the frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation surgical technique for adults with severe ptosis and apraxia of eyelid opening.

Methods: A retrospective case series of 30 eyes with severe ptosis or apraxia of eyelid opening. Outcomes were assessed for margin to reflex distance 1 (MRD1), lagophthalmos, complications, and need for subsequent surgical intervention. A paired t-test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores of a quality-of-life questionnaire.

Results: Thirty eyes of 19 patients underwent surgery, 16 (53%) with combined frontalis + levator-Muller muscle flap and 14 (46%) with frontalis muscle flap alone. There were 14 female and 5 male patients, with an average age of 55 years (range, 18-76). Mean preoperative MRD1 was -0.6 mm (range, -5 to 2) with mean levator excursion of 7.1 mm. Seventeen eyes had a myogenic etiology, five had a paralytic etiology, six had blepharospasm with apraxia of lid opening, and two had a neurodegenerative etiology. Nineteen eyes (63%) had previously undergone ptosis repair. Mean postoperative MRD1 was 2.5 mm (range, 0.5 to 5) at mean follow-up of 63.3 days. There were no serious surgical complications; minor complications included ocular surface keratopathy and one patient who required surgical revision. Results of the QOL questionnaire indicated significant improvement in vision-related symptoms postoperatively (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Use of the frontalis muscle flap eyelid reanimation technique, with or without a levator-Muller retractor muscle flap, was very effective in this case series and provided good upper eyelid position with acceptable corneal protection and high patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信