肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症的预后沟通:意大利全国调查的结果。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6
Cristina Moglia, Francesca Palumbo, Rossana Botto, Barbara Iazzolino, Nicola Ticozzi, Andrea Calvo, Paolo Leombruni
{"title":"肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症的预后沟通:意大利全国调查的结果。","authors":"Cristina Moglia, Francesca Palumbo, Rossana Botto, Barbara Iazzolino, Nicola Ticozzi, Andrea Calvo, Paolo Leombruni","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease with a highly variable prognosis. Among the proposed prognostic models, the European Network for the cure of ALS (ENCALS) survival model has demonstrated good predictive performance. However, few studies have examined prognostic communication and the diffusion of prognostic algorithms in ALS care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate neurologists' attitudes toward prognostic communication and their knowledge and utilization of the ENCALS survival model in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was administered between May 2021 and March 2022 to the 40 Italian ALS Centers members of the Motor Neuron Disease Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two out of 40 (55.0%) Italian ALS Centers responded to the survey, totaling 37 responses. The model was known by 27 (73.0%) respondents. However, it was predominantly utilized for research (81.1%) rather than for clinical prognostic communication (7.4%). Major obstacles to prognostic communication included the unpredictability of disease course, fear of a negative impact on patients or caregivers, dysfunctional reaction to diagnosis, and cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, the model was viewed as potentially useful for improving clinical management, increasing disease awareness, and facilitating care planning, especially end-of-life planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the widespread recognition and positive perceptions of the ENCALS survival model among Italian neurologists with expertise in ALS, its implementation in clinical practice remains limited. Addressing this disparity may require systematic investigations and targeted training to integrate tailored prognostic communication into ALS care protocols, aligning with the growing availability of prognostic tools for ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5787-5794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: findings from a Nationwide Italian survey.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Moglia, Francesca Palumbo, Rossana Botto, Barbara Iazzolino, Nicola Ticozzi, Andrea Calvo, Paolo Leombruni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease with a highly variable prognosis. Among the proposed prognostic models, the European Network for the cure of ALS (ENCALS) survival model has demonstrated good predictive performance. However, few studies have examined prognostic communication and the diffusion of prognostic algorithms in ALS care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate neurologists' attitudes toward prognostic communication and their knowledge and utilization of the ENCALS survival model in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was administered between May 2021 and March 2022 to the 40 Italian ALS Centers members of the Motor Neuron Disease Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two out of 40 (55.0%) Italian ALS Centers responded to the survey, totaling 37 responses. The model was known by 27 (73.0%) respondents. However, it was predominantly utilized for research (81.1%) rather than for clinical prognostic communication (7.4%). Major obstacles to prognostic communication included the unpredictability of disease course, fear of a negative impact on patients or caregivers, dysfunctional reaction to diagnosis, and cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, the model was viewed as potentially useful for improving clinical management, increasing disease awareness, and facilitating care planning, especially end-of-life planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the widespread recognition and positive perceptions of the ENCALS survival model among Italian neurologists with expertise in ALS, its implementation in clinical practice remains limited. Addressing this disparity may require systematic investigations and targeted training to integrate tailored prognostic communication into ALS care protocols, aligning with the growing availability of prognostic tools for ALS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5787-5794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07702-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种致命的运动神经元疾病,预后极不稳定。在已提出的预后模型中,欧洲 ALS(肌萎缩侧索硬化症)治愈网络(ENCALS)生存模型具有良好的预测性能。然而,很少有研究对 ALS 治疗中的预后交流和预后算法的传播进行研究:调查神经科医生对预后交流的态度,以及他们对 ENCALS 生存模型的了解和在临床实践中的应用情况:在 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,对意大利神经病学学会运动神经元疾病研究小组的 40 个意大利 ALS 中心成员进行了网络调查:结果:40 个意大利 ALS 中心中有 22 个(55.0%)对调查做出了回应,共计 37 个回应。27个(73.0%)受访者知道该模型。然而,该模型主要用于研究(81.1%)而非临床预后交流(7.4%)。预后交流的主要障碍包括病程的不可预测性、担心对患者或护理人员造成负面影响、对诊断的机能障碍反应以及认知障碍。尽管如此,该模型仍被认为可能有助于改善临床管理、提高对疾病的认识、促进护理规划,尤其是临终规划:尽管ENCALS生存模型在意大利具有ALS专业知识的神经科医生中得到了广泛认可和积极评价,但其在临床实践中的应用仍然有限。要解决这一差距,可能需要进行系统的调查和有针对性的培训,以便将量身定制的预后沟通纳入 ALS 护理方案,并与越来越多的 ALS 预后工具保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: findings from a Nationwide Italian survey.

Prognostic communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: findings from a Nationwide Italian survey.

Background: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal motor neuron disease with a highly variable prognosis. Among the proposed prognostic models, the European Network for the cure of ALS (ENCALS) survival model has demonstrated good predictive performance. However, few studies have examined prognostic communication and the diffusion of prognostic algorithms in ALS care.

Objective: To investigate neurologists' attitudes toward prognostic communication and their knowledge and utilization of the ENCALS survival model in clinical practice.

Methods: A web-based survey was administered between May 2021 and March 2022 to the 40 Italian ALS Centers members of the Motor Neuron Disease Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology.

Results: Twenty-two out of 40 (55.0%) Italian ALS Centers responded to the survey, totaling 37 responses. The model was known by 27 (73.0%) respondents. However, it was predominantly utilized for research (81.1%) rather than for clinical prognostic communication (7.4%). Major obstacles to prognostic communication included the unpredictability of disease course, fear of a negative impact on patients or caregivers, dysfunctional reaction to diagnosis, and cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, the model was viewed as potentially useful for improving clinical management, increasing disease awareness, and facilitating care planning, especially end-of-life planning.

Conclusions: Despite the widespread recognition and positive perceptions of the ENCALS survival model among Italian neurologists with expertise in ALS, its implementation in clinical practice remains limited. Addressing this disparity may require systematic investigations and targeted training to integrate tailored prognostic communication into ALS care protocols, aligning with the growing availability of prognostic tools for ALS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信