体重增加会降低对雷公藤多苷的反应:基于人工智能的定量心肌灌注研究。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
E Androulakis, G Georgiopoulos, A Azzu, E Surkova, A Bakula, P Papagkikas, A Briasoulis, R De Silva, P Kellman, D J Pennell, F Alpendurada
{"title":"体重增加会降低对雷公藤多苷的反应:基于人工智能的定量心肌灌注研究。","authors":"E Androulakis, G Georgiopoulos, A Azzu, E Surkova, A Bakula, P Papagkikas, A Briasoulis, R De Silva, P Kellman, D J Pennell, F Alpendurada","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is conflicting evidence regarding the response to a fixed dose of regadenoson in patients with high body weight. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of regadenoson in patients with varying body weights using novel quantitative CMR perfusion parameters in addition to standard clinical markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with typical angina and/or risk factors for coronary artery disease (N=217) underwent regadenoson stress CMR perfusion imaging using a dual-sequence quantitative protocol with perfusion parameters generated from an artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithm. CMR was performed on 1.5T scanners using a standard 0.4mg injection of regadenoson. A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing adenosine stress perfusion (N=218) was used as a control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An inverse association of myocardial perfusion reserve and weight (mean decrease -0.05 per 10Kg increase, 95% CI -0.009/-0.0001, P=0.045) was noted in the regadenoson group but not in patients stressed with adenosine (P=0.77). Adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed a 10Kg increase resulted in 36% increased odds for inadequate stress response (OR= 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.69, P=0.005). Moreover, a significant interaction (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, P=0.012) between stressor type (regadenoson vs adenosine) and weight was noted. This was also confirmed in the propensity matched subgroup (P=0.024) and was not attenuated after adjustment (P=0.041). BSA (P=0.006) but not BMI (P=0.055) was differentially associated with inadequate response conditional to the stressor used, and this association remained significant after adjustment for confounders (P=0.025). Patients in the highest quartile of weight (>93Kg) or BSA (>2.06m<sup>2</sup>) had substantially increased odds for inadequate response with regadenoson (OR=8.19, 95% CI 2.04-32.97, P=0.003 for increased weight and OR=7.75, 95% CI 1.93- 31.13, P=0.004 for increased BSA). Both weight and BSA had excellent discriminative ability for inadequate regadenoson response (ROC area under curve 0.84 and 0.83 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using quantitative perfusion CMR in patients undergoing pharmacological stress with regadenoson, we found an inverse relationship between patient weight and both clinical response and myocardial perfusion parameters. A fixed-dose bolus approach may not be adequate to induce maximal hyperemia in patients with increased weight. Weight-adjusted stressors like adenosine may be considered instead in patients with body weight > 93Kg and BSA > 2.06m<sup>2</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced response to regadenoson with increased weight: an artificial intelligence based quantitative myocardial perfusion study.\",\"authors\":\"E Androulakis, G Georgiopoulos, A Azzu, E Surkova, A Bakula, P Papagkikas, A Briasoulis, R De Silva, P Kellman, D J Pennell, F Alpendurada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is conflicting evidence regarding the response to a fixed dose of regadenoson in patients with high body weight. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of regadenoson in patients with varying body weights using novel quantitative CMR perfusion parameters in addition to standard clinical markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with typical angina and/or risk factors for coronary artery disease (N=217) underwent regadenoson stress CMR perfusion imaging using a dual-sequence quantitative protocol with perfusion parameters generated from an artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithm. CMR was performed on 1.5T scanners using a standard 0.4mg injection of regadenoson. A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing adenosine stress perfusion (N=218) was used as a control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An inverse association of myocardial perfusion reserve and weight (mean decrease -0.05 per 10Kg increase, 95% CI -0.009/-0.0001, P=0.045) was noted in the regadenoson group but not in patients stressed with adenosine (P=0.77). Adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed a 10Kg increase resulted in 36% increased odds for inadequate stress response (OR= 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.69, P=0.005). Moreover, a significant interaction (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, P=0.012) between stressor type (regadenoson vs adenosine) and weight was noted. This was also confirmed in the propensity matched subgroup (P=0.024) and was not attenuated after adjustment (P=0.041). BSA (P=0.006) but not BMI (P=0.055) was differentially associated with inadequate response conditional to the stressor used, and this association remained significant after adjustment for confounders (P=0.025). Patients in the highest quartile of weight (>93Kg) or BSA (>2.06m<sup>2</sup>) had substantially increased odds for inadequate response with regadenoson (OR=8.19, 95% CI 2.04-32.97, P=0.003 for increased weight and OR=7.75, 95% CI 1.93- 31.13, P=0.004 for increased BSA). Both weight and BSA had excellent discriminative ability for inadequate regadenoson response (ROC area under curve 0.84 and 0.83 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using quantitative perfusion CMR in patients undergoing pharmacological stress with regadenoson, we found an inverse relationship between patient weight and both clinical response and myocardial perfusion parameters. A fixed-dose bolus approach may not be adequate to induce maximal hyperemia in patients with increased weight. Weight-adjusted stressors like adenosine may be considered instead in patients with body weight > 93Kg and BSA > 2.06m<sup>2</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101066\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于高体重患者对固定剂量瑞格列奈松的反应,存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究旨在评估雷加地诺松对不同体重患者的疗效,除了使用标准临床指标外,还使用了新型定量 CMR 灌注参数:具有典型心绞痛和/或冠状动脉疾病危险因素的连续患者(217 人)接受了雷加地诺松应激 CMR 灌注成像,该成像采用双序列定量方案,灌注参数由基于人工智能(AI)的算法生成。CMR 在 1.5T 扫描仪上进行,使用标准的 0.4 毫克瑞格列酮注射液。一组连续接受腺苷应激灌注的患者(N=218)作为对照组:结果:雷加登罗松组的心肌灌注储备与体重呈反向关系(体重每增加 10 千克平均下降-0.05,95% CI -0.009/-0.0001,P=0.045),但在接受腺苷应激灌注的患者中则没有这种关系(P=0.77)。调整后的逻辑回归分析显示,体重增加 10 千克导致应激反应不足的几率增加 36%(OR= 1.36,95% CI 1.10-1.69,P=0.005)。此外,应激源类型(雷公藤多苷与腺苷)与体重之间存在明显的交互作用(OR=1.09,95% CI 1.02-1.16,P=0.012)。这在倾向匹配亚组中也得到了证实(P=0.024),并且在调整后也没有减弱(P=0.041)。BSA(P=0.006)而非 BMI(P=0.055)与所使用的应激源条件下的反应不足有不同程度的相关性,在对混杂因素进行调整后,这种相关性仍然显著(P=0.025)。体重(>93 千克)或BSA(>2.06 平方米)最高四分位数的患者对雷公藤多苷反应不充分的几率大大增加(体重增加时,OR=8.19,95% CI 2.04-32.97,P=0.003;BSA 增加时,OR=7.75,95% CI 1.93-31.13,P=0.004)。体重和 BSA 对雷公藤多苷反应不足都有很好的判别能力(ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.84 和 0.83):通过对接受瑞格列酮药物应激的患者进行定量灌注 CMR,我们发现患者体重与临床反应和心肌灌注参数之间存在反比关系。在体重增加的患者中,固定剂量的栓剂方法可能不足以诱导最大充血。对于体重大于 93 千克且 BSA 大于 2.06 平方米的患者,可以考虑使用腺苷等调整体重的压力源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduced response to regadenoson with increased weight: an artificial intelligence based quantitative myocardial perfusion study.

Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding the response to a fixed dose of regadenoson in patients with high body weight. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of regadenoson in patients with varying body weights using novel quantitative CMR perfusion parameters in addition to standard clinical markers.

Methods: Consecutive patients with typical angina and/or risk factors for coronary artery disease (N=217) underwent regadenoson stress CMR perfusion imaging using a dual-sequence quantitative protocol with perfusion parameters generated from an artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithm. CMR was performed on 1.5T scanners using a standard 0.4mg injection of regadenoson. A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing adenosine stress perfusion (N=218) was used as a control group.

Results: An inverse association of myocardial perfusion reserve and weight (mean decrease -0.05 per 10Kg increase, 95% CI -0.009/-0.0001, P=0.045) was noted in the regadenoson group but not in patients stressed with adenosine (P=0.77). Adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed a 10Kg increase resulted in 36% increased odds for inadequate stress response (OR= 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.69, P=0.005). Moreover, a significant interaction (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, P=0.012) between stressor type (regadenoson vs adenosine) and weight was noted. This was also confirmed in the propensity matched subgroup (P=0.024) and was not attenuated after adjustment (P=0.041). BSA (P=0.006) but not BMI (P=0.055) was differentially associated with inadequate response conditional to the stressor used, and this association remained significant after adjustment for confounders (P=0.025). Patients in the highest quartile of weight (>93Kg) or BSA (>2.06m2) had substantially increased odds for inadequate response with regadenoson (OR=8.19, 95% CI 2.04-32.97, P=0.003 for increased weight and OR=7.75, 95% CI 1.93- 31.13, P=0.004 for increased BSA). Both weight and BSA had excellent discriminative ability for inadequate regadenoson response (ROC area under curve 0.84 and 0.83 respectively).

Conclusions: Using quantitative perfusion CMR in patients undergoing pharmacological stress with regadenoson, we found an inverse relationship between patient weight and both clinical response and myocardial perfusion parameters. A fixed-dose bolus approach may not be adequate to induce maximal hyperemia in patients with increased weight. Weight-adjusted stressors like adenosine may be considered instead in patients with body weight > 93Kg and BSA > 2.06m2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信